Rep. Jasmine Crockett expressed disappointment that only two white House representatives voted against a resolution honoring Charlie Kirk, citing his harmful rhetoric targeting people of color. The resolution, which passed with 58 Democrats voting against it, celebrated Kirk’s “life and legacy,” despite his history of making racist remarks and expressing views that were deemed offensive by many. Crockett highlighted Kirk’s personal attacks against her and his promotion of the “great replacement” theory, further solidifying her opposition to the resolution. Other lawmakers, including Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the Congressional Black Caucus, echoed similar concerns, condemning Kirk’s divisive ideology and the resolution’s attempt to legitimize it.
Read More
Representative Jasmine Crockett criticized Republicans for immediately assuming Democrats were responsible for the shooting of conservative podcaster Charlie Kirk, emphasizing the motive and perpetrator were unknown. She pointed out the potential for the shooter to be motivated by right-wing ideologies, citing white supremacy as a frequent factor in mass shootings. Furthermore, Crockett highlighted the need for conversations on free speech boundaries and the impact of inflammatory rhetoric, emphasizing the need for increased personal security due to the current political climate. She also referenced Kirk’s own controversial statements about the Second Amendment and the acceptance of some gun deaths.
Read More
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott accuses Rep. Jasmine Crockett of racism after she objects to redistricting plan. It’s a familiar pattern, isn’t it? The accusation, ironically, often reveals the truth. Accuse others of what you’re doing, as you do it. It’s almost as if there’s a playbook. It’s a tactic that feels designed to deflect and control the narrative. In this case, it’s about Texas’s redistricting plan, and Rep. Crockett’s objections to it.
The whole situation feels like gaslighting, doesn’t it? The accusations of racism, especially coming from those implementing policies that appear to disadvantage certain groups, it’s like a deliberate attempt to obfuscate what’s really happening.… Continue reading
MAGA pundit says Jasmine Crockett defending Black voters means she wants to end white race. Crockett called a proposed redistricting map racist since it would eliminate Black voting power. Charlie Kirk said that makes her the racist one. It’s a wild jump, isn’t it? To go from advocating for fair representation, particularly for Black voters, to wanting the eradication of the white race. That’s the core of the issue, isn’t it? It’s a classic example of the kind of narrative twisting that’s become so prevalent, especially within certain political circles.
The crux of the matter seems to be that Representative Jasmine Crockett, in her efforts to challenge a redistricting plan that would diminish Black voting power, is somehow, according to this pundit, aiming to “eliminate the white population.”… Continue reading
Representative Jasmine Crockett recently voiced strong criticism of Donald Trump, labeling him harshly and asserting his actions are enabled by the complicity of House and Senate Republicans, and crucially, the courts, particularly the Supreme Court. This assessment, shared widely on social media, has sparked significant backlash from right-wing users. These critics have attacked Crockett’s appearance and demeanor, with some resorting to racist comments. Conservative commentators have accused her of losing her mind and exhibiting Trump Derangement Syndrome, while others have derided her attire.
Read More
In a recent development, Rep. Jasmine Crockett seeks Ghislaine Maxwell’s testimony before a House committee, preceding her meeting with the Trump Justice Department. This push comes after a House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Maxwell, setting a deposition date. Crockett, a frequent Trump critic, believes this would ensure bipartisan questioning, unlike the Justice Department’s approach. Despite these efforts, both Crockett and Rep. Robert Garcia acknowledge Maxwell’s history of dishonesty.
Read More
Representative Jasmine Crockett has publicly stated her belief that Donald Trump is concealing information regarding the Epstein files. Crockett suggests that Trump’s reluctance to release any information is evidence of hidden details he wishes to keep private. This claim fuels ongoing speculation and interest surrounding Trump’s potential connections to the Epstein case. The Representative’s statement adds further pressure for transparency on the matter.
Read More
Texas Representative Jasmine Crockett criticized the Supreme Court’s decision to limit nationwide injunctions, suggesting it was a maneuver to benefit President Donald Trump. Crockett argued the ruling, which followed the court limiting the power of individual judges to issue nationwide injunctions, would hinder courts from blocking policies such as Trump’s challenge to birthright citizenship. According to Crockett, the Court is prioritizing Trump’s interests over upholding the Constitution. Despite Trump’s approval of the ruling, the details remain ambiguous enough that proposed changes to birthright citizenship could still be blocked nationwide.
Read More
Jasmine Crockett, without a doubt, has a talent for calling out the absurdities often spouted by certain members of the Republican Party. Her recent exchange, where she dismantled a Republican’s claim that the president’s approval rating was “soaring,” is a perfect example of her direct and effective communication style. It’s the kind of moment that resonates with those who are tired of political spin and prefer a healthy dose of truth.
The premise of the whole interaction stemmed from a Republican’s assertion that the president’s approval ratings were on the rise. This claim, however, was quickly and decisively refuted by Crockett, armed with readily available facts and figures.… Continue reading
During a recent House hearing, Representative Jasmine Crockett scrutinized Melania Trump’s “Einstein visa,” designed for individuals with extraordinary abilities. Crockett questioned the former First Lady’s eligibility for the visa, pointing out that it’s typically awarded to Nobel laureates, Olympic medalists, or those with significant achievements in various fields, which Melania Trump did not have. Crockett argued that Melania Trump, a model, did not possess the qualifications and therefore should not have been granted the visa. A witness at the hearing offered a defense of the First Lady, suggesting her marriage to Donald Trump was an achievement in itself.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood
Jasmine Crockett Fact-Checks Republican Claiming Trump’s Approval is “Soaring”
Jasmine Crockett, without a doubt, has a talent for calling out the absurdities often spouted by certain members of the Republican Party. Her recent exchange, where she dismantled a Republican’s claim that the president’s approval rating was “soaring,” is a perfect example of her direct and effective communication style. It’s the kind of moment that resonates with those who are tired of political spin and prefer a healthy dose of truth.
The premise of the whole interaction stemmed from a Republican’s assertion that the president’s approval ratings were on the rise. This claim, however, was quickly and decisively refuted by Crockett, armed with readily available facts and figures.… Continue reading