The Supreme Court formally faces a new challenge: an appeal to overturn the landmark ruling that legalized same-sex marriage. And the person spearheading this effort is Kim Davis, the former county clerk who famously refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples. It’s a situation that has reignited old debates and stirred up a lot of strong feelings on all sides.
The central argument Davis is putting forth is based on religious freedom. She asserts that her First Amendment right to practice her religion should shield her from personal liability for refusing to grant marriage licenses to same-sex couples. This is a complex legal argument, and it brings up a fundamental tension between religious freedom and the principle of equal treatment under the law.… Continue reading
A new study reveals that same-sex weddings and related spending by couples and out-of-state guests have generated approximately $5.9 billion in economic activity over the past decade. This includes an estimated $4.9 billion directly spent on weddings by 473,000 same-sex couples, plus nearly $1 billion from out-of-state guests. This spending supported an estimated 41,300 jobs and generated $432.2 million in state and local sales tax revenue. Despite recent state-level challenges, the Respect for Marriage Act ensures federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
Read More
The Southern Baptist Convention’s annual meeting will consider resolutions advocating for legal bans on pornography and same-sex marriage, reflecting biblically-based views on gender, marriage, and family. Further resolutions call for restrictions on sports betting and policies promoting childbearing. Internal debates include a potential ban on churches with women pastors and calls to defund the denomination’s public policy arm due to its stance on abortion. These discussions occur against a backdrop of the convention’s conservative shift and increasing alignment with a Christian nationalist agenda within the political landscape.
Read More
Senate Concurrent Resolution 3, introduced by Iowa Senator Sandy Salmon, seeks to overturn the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage. The resolution, unlikely to pass before the legislative session’s end, argues that Obergefell represents an illegitimate judicial overreach. While largely symbolic, the resolution reflects a broader trend of similar measures in other states, some even proposing stricter, more limited definitions of marriage. The resolution’s introduction has sparked criticism from LGBTQ+ advocates concerned about the potential erosion of established rights.
Read More
In a landmark decision, the Osaka High Court ruled that Japan’s refusal to legally recognize same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, aligning with four previous high court rulings. The court found that this violates the constitutional right to equality and the principle of individual dignity. While upholding the lower court’s denial of damages, the decision emphasizes the significant disadvantages faced by same-sex couples due to the current legal framework. This ruling, rejecting the Osaka District Court’s differing opinion, is expected to significantly influence future legal revisions regarding same-sex marriage.
Read More
Ten years after the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling established same-sex marriage nationwide, conservative efforts to overturn the decision are intensifying. Prominent figures like Mat Staver predict the overruling of Obergefell, citing a lack of constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Legislative actions, such as Oklahoma’s proposed tax credit bill, indirectly challenge the ruling, while the Respect for Marriage Act, passed in 2022, offers some protection. Despite majority public support for same-sex marriage, the ongoing debate reflects the ongoing political and legal battle over LGBTQ+ rights.
Read More
Kim Davis’s appeal against a $100,000 judgment for denying same-sex marriage licenses was argued before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Her lawyer, Mat Staver, argued that the payment is unwarranted, citing the First Amendment and questioning the quantifiability of emotional distress. Conversely, the plaintiffs’ attorney contended that Davis violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights while acting under color of law, emphasizing that her actions weren’t protected by the First Amendment in her official capacity. Staver aims to reach the Supreme Court, hoping to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges using similar reasoning as the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Read More
Thailand launched its new same-sex marriage law on Thursday, becoming the first Southeast Asian nation to legalize same-sex unions. Over 200 couples participated in a mass wedding ceremony in Bangkok, while 2SLGBTQ+ groups aimed for over 1,448 registrations nationwide, a symbolic number referencing the amended civil code. This landmark legislation follows decades of activism and makes Thailand the third Asian territory to legalize same-sex marriage. While celebrated as a significant step towards equality, challenges remain regarding broader legal recognition of same-sex families.
Read More
Thailand’s recent legalization of same-sex marriage marks a monumental step forward for LGBTQ+ rights in Southeast Asia, and the upcoming mass weddings are a joyous testament to this significant change. It’s a truly heartwarming event, showcasing the culmination of years of activism and a shift in societal attitudes. The sheer number of couples participating – around 200 – underscores the widespread anticipation and the deeply felt need for legal recognition among same-sex couples.
The story of Joe and Mate, a couple from Singapore and Malaysia respectively, perfectly encapsulates the struggles and eventual triumph that this landmark legislation represents. Their relationship, initially navigating the legal complexities and social stigmas surrounding homosexuality in their home countries, now blossoms under the umbrella of legal protection and recognition in Thailand.… Continue reading
A Republican representative has petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. This action is framed by the representative as a matter of restoring states’ rights in determining marriage laws, arguing that the Obergefell decision infringed upon traditional state authority in this area.
The assertion that this is solely about states’ rights is met with significant skepticism. Critics contend that this move is not a genuine effort to decentralize power but rather a thinly veiled attempt to further a conservative social agenda. This perspective highlights a pattern of utilizing “states’ rights” rhetoric to advance specific, often discriminatory, policy goals.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker