In a landmark decision, the Osaka High Court ruled that Japan’s refusal to legally recognize same-sex marriage is unconstitutional, aligning with four previous high court rulings. The court found that this violates the constitutional right to equality and the principle of individual dignity. While upholding the lower court’s denial of damages, the decision emphasizes the significant disadvantages faced by same-sex couples due to the current legal framework. This ruling, rejecting the Osaka District Court’s differing opinion, is expected to significantly influence future legal revisions regarding same-sex marriage.
Read More
Ten years after the Obergefell v. Hodges ruling established same-sex marriage nationwide, conservative efforts to overturn the decision are intensifying. Prominent figures like Mat Staver predict the overruling of Obergefell, citing a lack of constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Legislative actions, such as Oklahoma’s proposed tax credit bill, indirectly challenge the ruling, while the Respect for Marriage Act, passed in 2022, offers some protection. Despite majority public support for same-sex marriage, the ongoing debate reflects the ongoing political and legal battle over LGBTQ+ rights.
Read More
Kim Davis’s appeal against a $100,000 judgment for denying same-sex marriage licenses was argued before the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals. Her lawyer, Mat Staver, argued that the payment is unwarranted, citing the First Amendment and questioning the quantifiability of emotional distress. Conversely, the plaintiffs’ attorney contended that Davis violated their Fourteenth Amendment rights while acting under color of law, emphasizing that her actions weren’t protected by the First Amendment in her official capacity. Staver aims to reach the Supreme Court, hoping to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges using similar reasoning as the overturning of Roe v. Wade.
Read More
Thailand launched its new same-sex marriage law on Thursday, becoming the first Southeast Asian nation to legalize same-sex unions. Over 200 couples participated in a mass wedding ceremony in Bangkok, while 2SLGBTQ+ groups aimed for over 1,448 registrations nationwide, a symbolic number referencing the amended civil code. This landmark legislation follows decades of activism and makes Thailand the third Asian territory to legalize same-sex marriage. While celebrated as a significant step towards equality, challenges remain regarding broader legal recognition of same-sex families.
Read More
Thailand’s recent legalization of same-sex marriage marks a monumental step forward for LGBTQ+ rights in Southeast Asia, and the upcoming mass weddings are a joyous testament to this significant change. It’s a truly heartwarming event, showcasing the culmination of years of activism and a shift in societal attitudes. The sheer number of couples participating – around 200 – underscores the widespread anticipation and the deeply felt need for legal recognition among same-sex couples.
The story of Joe and Mate, a couple from Singapore and Malaysia respectively, perfectly encapsulates the struggles and eventual triumph that this landmark legislation represents. Their relationship, initially navigating the legal complexities and social stigmas surrounding homosexuality in their home countries, now blossoms under the umbrella of legal protection and recognition in Thailand.… Continue reading
A Republican representative has petitioned the Supreme Court to overturn the landmark 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling that legalized same-sex marriage nationwide. This action is framed by the representative as a matter of restoring states’ rights in determining marriage laws, arguing that the Obergefell decision infringed upon traditional state authority in this area.
The assertion that this is solely about states’ rights is met with significant skepticism. Critics contend that this move is not a genuine effort to decentralize power but rather a thinly veiled attempt to further a conservative social agenda. This perspective highlights a pattern of utilizing “states’ rights” rhetoric to advance specific, often discriminatory, policy goals.… Continue reading
The Fukuoka High Court’s ruling declared Japan’s prohibition on same-sex marriage unconstitutional, citing violations of Articles 13 and 14 of the Constitution, which guarantee the pursuit of happiness and equality under the law, respectively. This marks the third high court to reach this conclusion, strengthening the momentum for legislative change. While the court upheld the lower court’s dismissal of plaintiffs’ damage claims, the decision significantly advances the legal recognition of same-sex relationships. The ruling contrasts with previous lower court decisions, some of which deemed the law to be in a “state of unconstitutionality,” highlighting the ongoing legal battle for marriage equality in Japan.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood