January 6th Investigation

Smith’s Report: Trump Jan 6 Case Could Have Secured Conviction

Jack Smith’s final report on the January 6th case unequivocally states that his case against Donald Trump was robust enough to secure a conviction. This declaration, while seemingly straightforward, carries significant weight given the intense scrutiny and political polarization surrounding the investigation. It highlights the strength of the evidence gathered and the legal arguments developed by Smith’s team, suggesting a high probability of success had the trial proceeded as planned.

The report’s conclusion directly addresses the central question of whether the prosecution’s case was viable. By stating that it could have “sustained a conviction,” Smith effectively counters any claims that the investigation was weak or lacked sufficient evidence to bring a successful prosecution.… Continue reading

Trump’s Jan 6th Report: Criminal Attempts & a Nation’s Despair

Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report details Donald Trump’s alleged attempts to interfere with the 2020 election, outlining charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States and obstruct official proceedings. These charges stemmed from efforts to overturn the election results. However, the Department of Justice declined to prosecute Trump due to its longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president. The report itself is now publicly available.

Read More

Garland to Release Partial Jan. 6 Report, Sparking Outrage

Garland’s intention to release a portion of Jack Smith’s report concerning the January 6th probe has sparked considerable outrage and skepticism. The timing, three years after the events in question, is viewed by many as far too late, fueling accusations of deliberate inaction and a lack of commitment to accountability. This delayed release reinforces a sense of profound disappointment in the Attorney General, with some questioning his overall effectiveness and suggesting his actions are too little, too late.

The decision to release only a portion of the report, specifically Volume 1 covering the DC case on Trump’s attempts to overturn the election, is met with significant criticism.… Continue reading

Trump AG Nominee’s $25K Campaign Donation Raises Ethical Questions

Following Matt Gaetz’s withdrawal, Pam Bondi, a former Florida attorney general and long-time Trump ally, was nominated as Attorney General. Bondi’s extensive career includes high-profile cases and experience as a public official. However, her past is marked by ethical questions regarding campaign donations and actions taken during her time as Florida’s attorney general. Should she be confirmed, Bondi will oversee significant ongoing cases, including the January 6th investigation and civil rights matters.

Read More