Following a report questioning the validity of President Biden’s pardons, issued before leaving office, Donald Trump declared them “VOID,” prompting former Rep. Adam Kinzinger to challenge Trump to file criminal charges. Kinzinger, a frequent Trump critic and recipient of one of the pardons, argues that Trump’s actions are a distraction and that the use of an autopen for presidential signatures is not prohibited and has historical precedent. Legal experts have confirmed that a president’s handwritten signature is not required for a pardon to be valid. Kinzinger confidently asserts that any legal challenge would be easily defeated in court.
Read More
Enrique Tarrio, the former leader of the Proud Boys, was recently arrested at the US Capitol. This arrest, occurring at the very location of the January 6th insurrection, immediately sparks a wave of reactions, ranging from outrage to cynical resignation. The sheer audacity of his return to the scene, considering his past involvement and the group’s designation as a terrorist organization in Canada, fuels the intense public response.
The timing of the arrest raises questions about the effectiveness of the justice system. Some believe that his prior involvement and subsequent release only emboldened him to engage in further potential criminal activity.… Continue reading
Eighty-three percent of Americans disapprove of Trump’s January 6th pardons, according to a recent poll. This significant disapproval highlights a widespread rejection of the actions taken by the former president. The sheer magnitude of the negative response suggests a deep-seated concern among the public regarding the pardons and their implications.
This high level of disapproval underscores a potential disconnect between the former president’s base and the broader American populace. It raises questions about the extent to which the former president’s actions align with the values and priorities of the majority of Americans. The substantial opposition might indicate a growing recognition of the seriousness of the January 6th events and a desire for accountability.… Continue reading
Mitch McConnell’s long-game political strategy, detailed in his memoir *The Long Game*, prioritized meticulous planning and a focus on long-term goals over immediate reactions. However, his refusal to convict Donald Trump during impeachment, a decision based on faith in other checks and balances, proved a significant miscalculation. This failure, coupled with the rise of Trump and Elon Musk, has undermined McConnell’s strategy and potentially jeopardized the constitutional order. Despite recent instances of defiance towards Trump, the consequences of McConnell’s past decisions are now evident.
Read More
President Trump’s pardons of nearly 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6th insurrection, including those convicted of assaulting police officers, send a dangerous message. This act of clemency signals that there are no consequences for violent acts against the government, undermining the sacrifices of law enforcement and emboldening insurrectionists. Furthermore, statements from pardoned individuals suggest a desire for revenge and continued action. This pardon isn’t an end, but a potential catalyst for further unrest.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s handling of the investigation into Donald Trump’s actions surrounding the January 6th insurrection is widely criticized for its delay and perceived lack of decisiveness. While initially focusing on lower-level participants, Garland’s slow response to investigate Trump directly allowed time for the Supreme Court and other actors to hinder subsequent prosecutions. This inaction, coupled with the Supreme Court’s decision in *Trump v. United States*, is argued to have significantly weakened efforts to hold Trump accountable, ultimately contributing to the rise of reactionary forces. The author contends that Garland’s failure to act swiftly represents a significant dereliction of duty.
Read More
The statement, “I broke into the Capitol on January 6th – now I’ll be a VIP at Trump’s inauguration,” is deeply unsettling. It encapsulates a disturbing normalization of the events of that day and a blatant disregard for the rule of law. The sheer audacity of this claim speaks volumes about the political climate and the lingering effects of the January 6th insurrection.
This individual’s boast highlights a profound disconnect between actions and consequences. The act of storming the Capitol, a symbol of American democracy, was an attempt to subvert the democratic process through violence or the threat of violence. To then be rewarded with VIP status at a political event is deeply troubling and suggests a complete lack of accountability.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s 137-page report on the January 6th insurrection details substantial evidence against Donald Trump and his associates, sufficient for a conviction were he not a former and potentially future president. The report undermines the Supreme Court’s presidential immunity ruling by highlighting that much of Trump’s conduct was outside his constitutional powers. Furthermore, the report implicitly criticizes the Department of Justice’s policy against indicting a sitting president, suggesting this policy hindered the investigation. The report’s evidence heavily implicates both high-profile and less prominent participants in a coordinated attempt to subvert the 2020 election results.
Read More
Justin LaGesse, a 37-year-old Illinois resident, received an 11-month prison sentence and was ordered to pay $43,315 in restitution for his role in the January 6th Capitol riot. He pleaded guilty to felony destruction of government property after using a flagpole to break a Capitol window and verbally assaulting police officers. LaGesse’s actions, which included shouting insults at law enforcement, were captured on surveillance footage. The sentencing follows over 1,500 other charges related to the Capitol breach.
Read More
Donald Trump’s inauguration on January 20th marks a pivotal moment, demanding comprehensive news coverage. HuffPost commits to providing fearless reporting on the new administration. To ensure this vital information remains accessible to all, support is requested to maintain free access to critical news. Readers can contribute financially or by simply creating a free account.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood