Trump January 6 Fund A Criminal Enterprise
The Supreme Court’s recent ruling in *Trump v. United States* established a broad interpretation of “presidential immunity,” suggesting a president may be absolutely immune from criminal prosecution for actions falling within their “conclusive and preclusive constitutional authority.” This invention, not explicitly found in the Constitution, has emboldened former President Trump and his allies, who appear to believe they are shielded from future accountability for potential misconduct. Critics argue that this ruling, particularly the notion that it could shield presidents from bribery or ordering assassinations, is a misinterpretation of constitutional principles and alien to American traditions.
John Q. Hosedrinker