The idea that Donald Trump should ever be eligible for the presidency after January 6 is not only compelling; it is a necessary conversation we must have as a society. Reflecting on that day and its implications shakes me to my core. It wasn’t merely an unprecedented disturbance; it was an insurrection against the principles upon which this nation was built. If we allow someone who played a role in such a brazen attack on our democracy to run for office again, what does that say about our commitment to the very ideals of democratic governance? It scares me to think we could be heading towards a reality where actions that once would have been unequivocally condemned are instead normalized.… Continue reading
McConnell backed Jack Smith and wanted Trump to “pay” for the events of January 6th. That’s what the headlines read, that’s what people are talking about. But let’s take a step back and really look at McConnell’s actions and the impact they have had on our country.
You know what would have really allowed Trump to pay? Convicting him during the two impeachment trials. That was McConnell’s chance to send a clear message that inciting an insurrection will not be tolerated. But what did he do? He chose to acquit. He had the power to hold Trump accountable, to make sure he “paid” for his role in January 6th, but he failed to act.… Continue reading
Trump pleading with a judge to stop Jan. 6 evidence from coming out before the 2024 election speaks volumes. As someone who always claims innocence, it’s puzzling why he would want to hide more evidence. The events of January 6th were a day filled with chaos and violence, not love as he tries to portray it. It’s concerning that he is attempting to suppress evidence of potential involvement of groups like Antifa. The question that arises is, if he truly has nothing to hide, why the desperation to stop the evidence from being released?
The delay tactics employed by Trump have brought us to a point where crucial evidence is on the brink of being made public right before the election.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel a sense of relief knowing that a judge has finally agreed to unseal additional filings from the Jan. 6 case, especially as Trump signals a challenge. The timing of this decision seems inconvenient for Trump, given that his lawyers have delayed proceedings for so long. It’s puzzling to think that there is still information that we, as voters, don’t know about what transpired on that fateful day.
Looking at the bigger picture, it’s clear that the general interest of the nation in getting to the bottom of how January 6th was planned outweighs any potential personal damage to Trump or his campaign.… Continue reading
I find it intriguing that Rep. Liz Cheney has taken a bold stand against Trump, especially in a party where loyalty to him seems unwavering. Her vocal criticism and refusal to support him after January 6th is commendable, even though it cost her politically. The fact that she has been a Republican since before Trump started spray tanning is an interesting point of reflection. It raises questions about the evolution and transformation of the Republican party in recent years.
Cheney’s decision to distance herself from Trump sets an example for other Republicans to potentially follow suit. Her endorsement of Kamala Harris, a Democrat, showcases a willingness to prioritize country over party.… Continue reading
Jack Smith’s Big New Jan. 6 Brief Is a Major Indictment of the Supreme Court
The recent unveiling of Jack Smith’s comprehensive brief regarding the events of January 6 has refueled a sense of righteous anger within me. The veil of corruption that shrouds the Supreme Court, particularly Justice Clarence Thomas, is glaringly apparent when we consider the implications of Ginni Thomas offering to lease buses for the riot. The fact that Clarence Thomas accepted millions of dollars in gifts from billionaires, failed to disclose that income, and faced no repercussions for such blatant corruption is a stain on our judicial system that cannot go unaddressed.… Continue reading
Trump’s response when he learned Pence’s life was in danger on January 6th: “So what?” These three words encapsulate the essence of who Donald Trump is as a person and as a leader. The sheer lack of regard for another human being, especially someone who held the position of Vice President of the United States, speaks volumes about his character. It is truly alarming to think that someone in such a powerful position could be so callous and indifferent to the well-being of others.
The events that unfolded on that fateful day in January revealed the true nature of Trump’s presidency.… Continue reading
Jack Smith lays out his case against Trump in vivid detail, and it is a riveting read that exposes the extent of Trump’s attempt to overturn the 2020 presidential election results. The allegations against Trump are staggering, from spreading false claims of election fraud to pressuring state officials and organizing fake electors. The document meticulously outlines Trump’s actions and the impact they had on the democratic process, painting a vivid picture of a leader willing to subvert the will of the people for personal gain.
One of the most damning accusations is Trump’s role in inciting the January 6 Capitol riot, where he used his platform to rile up his supporters with false claims and dangerous rhetoric.… Continue reading
It’s absolutely mind-boggling that former President Donald Trump could be so callous and indifferent to the safety of his own vice president, Mike Pence. Learning that Trump responded with a dismissive “so what” when informed that Pence had been rushed to safety during the Capitol riots is not only shocking but deeply troubling. It speaks volumes about Trump’s character, or lack thereof.
The fact that Trump seemed unfazed by the danger his own vice president was in is a stark reminder of his selfishness and disregard for anyone but himself. It’s horrifying to think that he would have been perfectly fine with Pence being harmed or even killed that day.… Continue reading
Jack Smith’s latest win in Trump’s January 6 case brings a glimmer of hope to those seeking justice for the insurrection that unfolded at the Capitol. The legal battle, led by Trump’s team of Todd Blanche and John Lauro, has been one of delay tactics and cries of unfairness when faced with the reality of impending court proceedings. It’s almost ironic how swiftly justice can move when the playing field is level and the judge is not swayed by outside influences.
The 180-page brief presented by Smith promises to lay out the damning evidence against Trump in a clear and concise manner.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker