Jack Smith’s decision to pause the January 6th case after Trump’s election has sparked outrage and disappointment among many. It feels like a surrender to the corrupt system that allows wealthy and powerful individuals to escape consequences for their actions. The anger and frustration are palpable, with many feeling like the justice system is rigged against the common person.
People are questioning why it took four years to bring this to trial, highlighting the glacial pace of justice in this situation. The perception is that the Department of Justice has been cowardly and inactive, failing to hold Trump accountable for his actions.… Continue reading
A federal judge has denied a request from a defendant in the January 6th Capitol riot case to delay his trial, dismissing the argument that President-elect Trump might pardon him. This denial comes as the defendant, an 18-year-old who entered the Capitol on January 6th, claimed that he was expecting to be pardoned by the incoming administration. He based this expectation on the assumption that Trump would fulfill his campaign promises of clemency for non-violent participants in the riot.
The judge’s decision, however, highlights the legal complexities surrounding potential pardons and their impact on ongoing criminal cases. While the potential for a presidential pardon exists, it is not a guarantee, and it certainly cannot be used as a reason to delay or dismiss a criminal case.… Continue reading
Jay Johnston’s recent sentencing to a year in prison for his role in the January 6 Capitol riot serves as a stark reminder of the chasms that can exist between personal choices and public personas. As someone who has enjoyed his work on “Bob’s Burgers” and “Mr. Show,” I view this situation with a mix of sadness and bewilderment. It’s hard to reconcile the comedic roles I’ve appreciated with the real-life actions of a man who participated in one of the most violent attacks on American democracy in recent history.
Johnston’s participation in the riot, where he was seen actively interfering with law enforcement, paints a troubling picture.… Continue reading
The claim that being an “acclaimed actor” places someone above the laws they choose to break feels audacious, bordering on delusional, particularly in the case of the “Bob’s Burgers” star known for his portrayal of Jimmy Pesto. The reality is that if you decide to take part in a violent insurrection, the consequences should follow regardless of your occupation or status. Johnston’s situation stands as a stark reminder that actions have repercussions, and attempting to evade accountability because of a perceived celebrity status only compounds the audacity of his actions.
It’s intriguing how he frames his legal troubles as the result of being targeted due to fame.… Continue reading
The idea that Donald Trump should ever be eligible for the presidency after January 6 is not only compelling; it is a necessary conversation we must have as a society. Reflecting on that day and its implications shakes me to my core. It wasn’t merely an unprecedented disturbance; it was an insurrection against the principles upon which this nation was built. If we allow someone who played a role in such a brazen attack on our democracy to run for office again, what does that say about our commitment to the very ideals of democratic governance? It scares me to think we could be heading towards a reality where actions that once would have been unequivocally condemned are instead normalized.… Continue reading
McConnell backed Jack Smith and wanted Trump to “pay” for the events of January 6th. That’s what the headlines read, that’s what people are talking about. But let’s take a step back and really look at McConnell’s actions and the impact they have had on our country.
You know what would have really allowed Trump to pay? Convicting him during the two impeachment trials. That was McConnell’s chance to send a clear message that inciting an insurrection will not be tolerated. But what did he do? He chose to acquit. He had the power to hold Trump accountable, to make sure he “paid” for his role in January 6th, but he failed to act.… Continue reading
Trump pleading with a judge to stop Jan. 6 evidence from coming out before the 2024 election speaks volumes. As someone who always claims innocence, it’s puzzling why he would want to hide more evidence. The events of January 6th were a day filled with chaos and violence, not love as he tries to portray it. It’s concerning that he is attempting to suppress evidence of potential involvement of groups like Antifa. The question that arises is, if he truly has nothing to hide, why the desperation to stop the evidence from being released?
The delay tactics employed by Trump have brought us to a point where crucial evidence is on the brink of being made public right before the election.… Continue reading
I can’t help but feel a sense of relief knowing that a judge has finally agreed to unseal additional filings from the Jan. 6 case, especially as Trump signals a challenge. The timing of this decision seems inconvenient for Trump, given that his lawyers have delayed proceedings for so long. It’s puzzling to think that there is still information that we, as voters, don’t know about what transpired on that fateful day.
Looking at the bigger picture, it’s clear that the general interest of the nation in getting to the bottom of how January 6th was planned outweighs any potential personal damage to Trump or his campaign.… Continue reading
I find it intriguing that Rep. Liz Cheney has taken a bold stand against Trump, especially in a party where loyalty to him seems unwavering. Her vocal criticism and refusal to support him after January 6th is commendable, even though it cost her politically. The fact that she has been a Republican since before Trump started spray tanning is an interesting point of reflection. It raises questions about the evolution and transformation of the Republican party in recent years.
Cheney’s decision to distance herself from Trump sets an example for other Republicans to potentially follow suit. Her endorsement of Kamala Harris, a Democrat, showcases a willingness to prioritize country over party.… Continue reading
Jack Smith’s Big New Jan. 6 Brief Is a Major Indictment of the Supreme Court
The recent unveiling of Jack Smith’s comprehensive brief regarding the events of January 6 has refueled a sense of righteous anger within me. The veil of corruption that shrouds the Supreme Court, particularly Justice Clarence Thomas, is glaringly apparent when we consider the implications of Ginni Thomas offering to lease buses for the riot. The fact that Clarence Thomas accepted millions of dollars in gifts from billionaires, failed to disclose that income, and faced no repercussions for such blatant corruption is a stain on our judicial system that cannot go unaddressed.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker