U.S. District Judge Jennifer Hall dismissed a defamation lawsuit against Fox News filed by Raymond Epps, who alleged the network’s false reporting linking him to the January 6th Capitol riot incited death threats. The judge granted Fox’s motion to dismiss without explanation. Epps, a former Marine, had cited Tucker Carlson’s promotion of the conspiracy theory as the source of his harassment. This dismissal follows similar dismissals of defamation suits against Fox News by Nina Jankowicz and Tony Bobulinski, leading Fox to cite these decisions as upholding First Amendment press freedoms.
Read More
Attorney General Merrick Garland’s delayed appointment of a special counsel in the January 6th case remains questionable, potentially impacting the timing and outcome of investigations. Trump’s legal victories, including favorable judicial assignments and Supreme Court rulings, highlight his remarkable luck and the strategic timing of key legal decisions. These rulings significantly bolster Trump’s legal position, potentially leading to dismissals of criminal charges and favorable civil case outcomes. The Supreme Court’s decision on presidential immunity further empowers Trump, suggesting a significant impact on future presidential actions.
Read More
Following the dismissal of the federal case against Donald Trump regarding his alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, Attorney General Merrick Garland faced sharp criticism from left-leaning figures. The case was dropped due to the Department of Justice’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents, a decision that special counsel Jack Smith supported. Critics argued that Garland’s perceived delays, including the timing of Smith’s appointment, contributed to Trump’s 2024 electoral victory and allowed him to avoid accountability. While the dismissal was without prejudice, allowing for future prosecution, the move sparked intense debate regarding Garland’s handling of the investigation and its broader implications.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dismissed the January 6th and classified documents cases against Donald Trump due to Justice Department policy barring the prosecution of a sitting president, though the dismissals were without prejudice. While the Georgia election interference case remains, its viability is uncertain due to ongoing appeals. Consequently, Trump avoids legal consequences for several indictments, including a conviction, setting a concerning precedent for future presidents. This impunity, combined with potential political retribution against prosecutors, suggests a future presidency operating largely beyond legal accountability.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith is concluding his investigations into Donald Trump, facing a tight deadline before Trump’s potential inauguration. Two cases are involved: one concerning Trump’s actions related to the January 6th insurrection and another regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith must submit a final report to Attorney General Garland, who will then decide on public release, though Trump’s potential retribution looms large. The reports’ contents, including classified information and grand jury materials, will be closely watched, especially considering Trump’s threats and the uncertain future of the investigations.
Read More
Pete Hegseth, Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Defense, was flagged as a potential insider threat by a fellow National Guard member due to a “Deus Vult” tattoo associated with white supremacist groups. This occurred despite Hegseth downplaying the role of military members in the January 6th attack and criticizing efforts to address extremism within the military. Hegseth’s nomination raises concerns given his past support for individuals accused of war crimes and his minimization of the January 6th insurrection. A fellow Guard member’s email to leadership specifically highlighted the tattoo as a potential threat, leading to Hegseth being pulled from the Biden inauguration detail.
Read More
Donald Trump got away with everything. It’s a statement that echoes in the minds of many, a sentiment of disbelief and frustration. The attack on the US Capitol on January 6th, 2021, an unprecedented assault on American democracy instigated by the sitting president, seems to have been met with an almost laughable lack of consequences. Trump, far from facing the full weight of the law for his actions, was not only acquitted by the Senate, but was even rewarded with a second run for the presidency, a clear sign that the system is failing to hold those in power accountable.
The sheer audacity of it all is mind-boggling.… Continue reading
Mike Davis, a potential candidate for Attorney General under President-elect Donald Trump, has outlined his plans for a Trump administration, including firing government employees, indicting members of the Biden family, deporting millions of immigrants, and pardoning January 6th defendants. Davis, in an interview with Benny Johnson, expressed his desire to “rain hell on Washington D.C.” with these drastic measures, raising concerns among the hosts of The New Abnormal podcast who fear the potential impact of such actions. Davis’s comments highlight the contentious atmosphere surrounding the incoming administration and the anxieties many feel about the direction of the country.
Read More
Zachary Alam, a participant in the January 6th Capitol riot, was sentenced to eight years in prison for his role in the attack, a sentence among the longest handed down in connection with the event. Alam, who had been the subject of conspiracy theories suggesting he was an undercover law enforcement operative, was convicted of eight felonies and several misdemeanors for his actions, including assaulting officers and smashing windows. Despite acknowledging his actions were illegal, Alam maintained that his actions were justified, echoing former President Trump’s false claims about the 2020 election. Federal prosecutors argued for a longer sentence, citing Alam’s violent and aggressive behavior during the riot, while Alam’s lawyer argued for a shorter sentence, emphasizing his mental health challenges. The judge, a Trump appointee, ultimately rejected Alam’s claims and sentenced him to prison, calling his actions “delusional” and not those of a patriot.
Read More
Special counsel Jack Smith’s request to pause the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in order to assess an “unprecedented circumstance” has sparked a firestorm of reactions. The move, while seemingly intended to ensure a fair and thorough investigation, has been met with a mix of outrage, resignation, and even a touch of morbid humor.
Many critics see Smith’s request as a sign of weakness, a capitulation to Trump’s penchant for manipulating the legal system to his advantage. They argue that the case should proceed without delay, that any pause only emboldens Trump and his allies. They point to the numerous allegations against Trump, including his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot and his handling of classified documents, as evidence that a swift resolution is necessary.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood