In a recent CNN interview, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller claimed the U.S. has never tolerated “unlawful riotous assemblies” at federal buildings, drawing immediate criticism. Critics pointed out that the Trump administration had pardoned over 1,500 individuals involved in the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot. This contradiction emerged amidst debates over the deployment of federal agents in Portland, Oregon, where local officials dispute the extent of violence compared to the administration’s claims. A federal judge, in a ruling against the Trump administration’s actions in Portland, agreed that the president had overstepped his authority.
Read More
YouTube, owned by Google, has agreed to pay $24.5 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump after his account was suspended following the January 6, 2021 attacks. The settlement allocates $22 million to the Trust for the National Mall and a White House ballroom construction, with the remainder going to other parties. This settlement follows similar agreements with Meta and X, making Google the third major tech company to settle lawsuits related to Trump’s post-presidency actions. Legal experts previously predicted these cases would be difficult to win. The settlement, which does not admit liability, came before a scheduled court hearing and barely impacts Alphabet’s significant market value.
Read More
Former White House lawyer Ty Cobb criticized the indictment of James Comey, stating that re-electing Trump would be a significant mistake. Cobb believes the indictment is retribution for Comey investigating Trump’s alleged ties to Russia and an attempt to rewrite history, particularly concerning the events surrounding the 2016 election and the January 6th insurrection. Cobb noted that the indictment, which stems from Comey’s alleged perjury in a 2020 Senate hearing, is likely dead in the water due to Trump’s public interference and meddling. Cobb, who served in the White House during the Russiagate investigation, has become an outspoken critic of the former president.
Read More
FBI Director Kash Patel has contradicted former President Donald Trump’s claims that the FBI instigated the January 6 attack. Patel stated that FBI agents were deployed for crowd control after the riot was declared, a breach of protocol, but not an instigation of violence. This stance reopens scrutiny of the FBI’s role during the attack, with Patel accusing his predecessor, Christopher Wray, of misleading Congress. Despite independent reviews dismissing claims of orchestration, Patel’s comments and the ongoing investigations highlight the continued political battles over the January 6 events.
Read More
Trump falsely suggests FBI agents to blame for igniting Jan. 6 violence, a claim that, when examined, unravels under the weight of his own actions and the facts of the day. It seems that the former president is employing a tactic that is both familiar and deeply troubling: attempting to shift responsibility for his own role in the events of January 6th.
The very notion that FBI agents were somehow orchestrating the violence at the Capitol is not only unsupported by evidence but also directly contradicts the narrative that Trump himself, through his rhetoric and actions, helped fuel the insurrection. Consider the context: Trump refused to authorize the National Guard to intervene and defend the Capitol.… Continue reading
The President, under the authority granted by the Constitution, has directed the Attorney General and the United States Attorney for the District of Columbia to fully enforce federal law regarding capital punishment. This action aims to deter and punish heinous crimes, particularly in the District of Columbia, where a crime emergency was declared. The memorandum emphasizes seeking the death penalty in appropriate cases and pursuing federal jurisdiction when possible. This directive aligns with the administration’s priority of restoring capital punishment and protecting public safety.
Read More
During a recent statement, Trump claimed that the “radicals on the right” are motivated by a desire to prevent crime, implicitly excusing their actions. He placed the blame on “radicals on the left,” labeling them as the problem. This follows a pattern of Trump defending those who commit violence aligned with his political views. This stance is consistent with his past support for individuals and groups accused of violence, including those involved in the January 6 Capitol riot and the 2017 Unite the Right rally.
Read More
Representative Seth Moulton’s suggestion that Donald Trump could demonstrate his commitment to ending political violence by rescinding the pardons he granted to individuals involved in the January 6th Capitol riot is a provocative one, sparking a lot of debate and reflection. The core of the argument is pretty straightforward: if Trump genuinely wants to quell political violence, then reversing actions that essentially condoned it would be a logical first step. This isn’t just about symbolism; it’s about sending a clear message that such behavior, especially when targeting political figures or institutions, will not be tolerated.
The issue quickly delves into the legality and the potential implications of such a move.… Continue reading
Representative Boebert argued that objections to the National Guard’s temporary presence in the city are hypocritical. She pointed out that there was no outcry from Washington D.C. residents or opposing political figures when a substantial National Guard presence was deployed around the Capitol, restricting First Amendment rights. Boebert framed this prior deployment as a similar scenario to the current one, implying that the current objections are inconsistent with past reactions. However, this comparison is a misrepresentation of the events of January 6, 2021, and the reasons behind the National Guard’s involvement.
Read More
Arizona Senator Ruben Gallego plans to introduce legislation to block the Pentagon from providing full military funeral honors to Ashli Babbitt. Gallego, who served in the military, believes Babbitt’s actions on January 6th disqualify her from receiving such honors, as she attempted to breach the Capitol and was shot and killed. He argues that awarding these honors to Babbitt would bring discredit to the Air Force. This move follows the Pentagon’s initial denial of the honors, a decision spurred by Babbitt’s involvement in the Capitol riot, despite pressure from groups like Judicial Watch who cited her military service and sought to align the honor with clemency granted to January 6 defendants.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood