The Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) has urged the Department of Justice (DOJ) Inspector General and the Archivist of the United States to investigate the DOJ’s removal of its January 6th database, which detailed Capitol attack prosecutions. CREW alleges this action violates 44 U.S.C. § 3106, requiring notification to the Archivist of record destruction. The database’s removal, seemingly connected to President Trump’s pardons, has been celebrated by some January 6th defendants but criticized as an attempt to erase evidence. CREW argues the database is a federal record whose deletion requires reporting, which the DOJ seemingly failed to do.
Read More
The nonpartisan “Impeach Trump Again” campaign, spearheaded by Free Speech for People, has already gathered over 100,000 signatures urging Congress to impeach former President Trump. The petition cites alleged violations of the emoluments clauses, pardoning of January 6th insurrectionists, and corrupt campaign practices as grounds for impeachment. This initiative builds upon a similar campaign launched in 2017, highlighting continued public concern regarding Trump’s actions. Despite previous impeachment attempts, the current campaign aims to reignite accountability efforts.
Read More
Impeach Trump Again, a nonpartisan campaign, has collected over 100,000 signatures supporting an impeachment investigation into President Trump. The petition cites numerous alleged offenses, including violations of the Emoluments Clauses, unlawful campaign practices, and pardoning January 6th insurrectionists. New grounds for impeachment have been added, encompassing abuses of power since his inauguration, such as the abuse of pardon power and unconstitutional firings. The campaign emphasizes the need for congressional accountability in response to these alleged actions.
Read More
Andrew Taake, a January 6th Capitol attacker pardoned by Donald Trump, faces an outstanding charge of soliciting a minor. Trump’s blanket pardon for those involved in the Capitol riot freed Taake from a federal prison sentence for assaulting police. However, a pre-existing state-level charge of soliciting a minor remains unresolved, making Taake a fugitive from Houston authorities. This situation highlights the ongoing controversy surrounding Trump’s pardons and their impact on justice for victims and law enforcement.
Read More
In response to criticism regarding pardons granted to January 6th rioters who assaulted law enforcement, Vance asserted his continued support for these pardons. He argued that the actions of the rioters should be distinguished from what he characterized as the Department of Justice’s politically motivated prosecutions of over 1,000 individuals. This distinction, Vance implied, justified the pardons, despite the rioters’ violent acts against police. The interview highlighted a sharp disagreement over the culpability of the rioters and the fairness of the subsequent legal processes.
Read More
All Senate Democrats co-sponsored a resolution disapproving of President Trump’s pardons for January 6th rioters who assaulted Capitol Police officers. While symbolic and lacking practical effect, the resolution condemns Trump’s action, which pardoned numerous individuals convicted of such crimes, excluding only those charged with seditious conspiracy who received commuted sentences. Republican support for the resolution was absent, with some voicing disapproval of the pardons while others, such as Vice President Vance, defended Trump’s decision. The resolution highlights the partisan divide surrounding Trump’s clemency and the ongoing debate about the January 6th events.
Read More
During a tense interview, Senator JD Vance clashed with a CBS host over the slow pace of lowering grocery prices. Vance attributed the delay to complex factors requiring time to address. He defended the administration’s efforts, suggesting that immediate solutions are unrealistic. The exchange highlighted the ongoing political debate surrounding inflation and its impact on consumers.
Read More
Following President Trump’s attempt to revise the narrative surrounding the January 6th Capitol attack, a Department of Justice database detailing the extensive criminal charges and convictions related to the event was removed from its website. This searchable database, cataloging the largest criminal investigation in modern DOJ history, disappeared concurrently with Trump’s pardons and efforts to dismiss cases. The removal, celebrated by those convicted, coincided with the silencing of related FBI information, including a “Most Wanted” list of Capitol rioters. While some information remains accessible through alternative sources like court records and press releases, thousands of pages from the database are now unavailable. The timing suggests a deliberate effort to obscure the scale of the January 6th attacks.
Read More
Another January 6th rioter has rejected a pardon offered by Donald Trump, stating simply, “I did those things.” This action, while seemingly straightforward, speaks volumes about the complex landscape of accountability, regret, and the enduring impact of the events of that day.
The rejection of a presidential pardon is a significant act, especially considering the potential ramifications for the individual’s future. It implies a level of self-awareness and acceptance of responsibility that is rarely seen in similar situations. This individual is prioritizing personal integrity and the consequences of their actions over a potential reprieve from legal penalties.
This decision also underscores the lasting effects of the January 6th insurrection.… Continue reading
Newly revealed documents expose that two 2023 Utah Oath Keepers leadership meetings included former law enforcement, a current prosecutor, and a former elected official. These meetings, focusing on training and the role of armed responders, highlight the group’s ties to conservative politics and law enforcement. Despite Stewart Rhodes’s January 6th conviction (since commuted), the Utah chapter actively rebuilt, demonstrating the organization’s resilience. The involvement of individuals with law enforcement and legal backgrounds raises concerns about the group’s continued influence and potential for future activity.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood