Greg Rosen, the former chief of the Justice Department’s Capitol Siege Section, resigned his position to join a private law firm. Rosen expressed alarm at President Trump’s pardons of January 6th rioters, deeming them a dangerous message condoning political violence. He highlighted the Justice Department’s exceptionally high conviction rate in these cases, attributing it to overwhelming evidence, not bias. Rosen also criticized the subsequent demotion or dismissal of prosecutors involved in these cases, viewing it as an attack on the department’s independence.
Read More
Former Justice Department official Greg Rosen defends the department’s handling of January 6th cases, asserting that prosecutions were fair, thorough, and upheld the Constitution. He criticizes President Trump’s pardons of rioters, arguing they condone political violence and undermine the rule of law. Rosen further condemns the Trump administration’s targeting and dismissal of federal employees involved in the investigation, claiming this hinders future efforts to prevent similar crimes. He concludes that the historical record of the prosecutions should serve as a testament to the rule of law despite ongoing political efforts to distort the events of January 6th.
Read More
Pamela Hemphill, a January 6th Capitol rioter, is actively rejecting a potential presidential pardon. She pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge and served two months in jail, acknowledging her guilt and denouncing Trump’s claims of a stolen election. Hemphill believes accepting a pardon would perpetuate Trump’s false narrative and considers his actions irresponsible. With the assistance of Idaho Senator James Risch, she has formally refused clemency.
Read More
Despite Congressional mandate, a bronze plaque honoring law enforcement’s January 6th, 2021 Capitol defense remains uninstalled, relegated to a Capitol basement. House Republicans, citing no public reason, have not directed its installation near the West Front as required by law, a delay Democrats attribute to pressure from former President Trump. This inaction, condemned by Democrats and affected officers’ families, ignores the heroism of officers who defended the Capitol during the attack. The plaque’s delayed installation highlights a partisan divide over acknowledging the events of January 6th.
Read More
TruSkin’s Don’t Fry Day sale (until 5/26) offers up to 45% off its Vitamin C skincare line, featuring a new SPF 30 serum praised by a board-certified dermatologist for its lightweight texture and natural tint. Also included are best-selling vitamin C serums, gentle face scrubs, and brightening moisturizers, all formulated with skin-beneficial ingredients like aloe vera and jojoba oil. These products combat sun damage, promote healthy aging, and improve skin radiance and tone.
Read More
The $2.5 million settlement resolves the wrongful death lawsuit filed by the family of Ashli Babbitt, overturning a prior DOJ determination that her civil rights were not violated. The settlement includes legal fees, with a portion allocated to the right-wing legal group Judicial Watch. This resolution comes amidst ongoing conservative efforts to minimize the January 6th Capitol attack and portray participants as victims. The actions of Lt. Michael Byrd, who shot Babbitt, were previously deemed justified by both a DOJ investigation and internal Capitol Police investigation.
Read More
House Democrat unveils articles of impeachment against Trump. This action, while symbolically significant, faces an uphill battle given the current political landscape. The sheer number of potential grounds for impeachment highlights the gravity of the accusations leveled against the former president. Many believe his actions, from tariffs deemed illegal and widely unpopular, to alleged comfort and aid given to insurrectionists, warrant serious consequences.
The 14th Amendment, specifically Section 3, provides a compelling legal argument for impeachment. This section prohibits individuals who have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the United States from holding office. Given the accusations surrounding Trump’s role in the January 6th events and subsequent pardons granted to those involved, this argument carries considerable weight, suggesting a direct violation of the Constitution.… Continue reading
President Trump’s recent statement threatening 20-year sentences for Tesla vandals, coupled with his previous pardons of January 6th rioters, has sparked widespread online mockery. Social media users highlighted the perceived hypocrisy of harsh punishment for property damage while granting clemency to individuals charged with insurrection. Trump’s comments, amplified by Elon Musk, have fueled criticism regarding the administration’s priorities and inconsistent application of justice. The disparity in treatment has led to accusations of hypocrisy and calls for accountability.
Read More
President Trump issued a memo revoking the security clearances of numerous political opponents, including former Vice President Kamala Harris, Hillary Clinton, and President Joe Biden. The memo cited a lack of national interest in these individuals accessing classified information, impacting their past access based on previous government roles. This action also targeted Republicans who investigated the January 6th insurrection and several lawyers who have pursued legal actions against Trump. The directive extends to family members and involves rescinding access to classified briefings and potentially other forms of access.
Read More
Former President Trump declared President Biden’s pardons of January 6th Committee members invalid, citing the use of an autopen for signing the documents. This claim is baseless, as the use of an autopen for signing official documents is legally binding, per Department of Justice guidance. Trump’s assertion ignores the president’s sole authority to issue pardons, and the Constitution provides no mechanism for their reversal. Committee members have publicly dismissed Trump’s pronouncements.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood