Trump’s legal team is contesting the British Broadcasting Corporation’s defense in a defamation lawsuit, arguing their discovery requests are “excessive and impermissibly broad” and attempt to shift the focus to the events of January 6th rather than the BBC’s alleged misrepresentation of Donald Trump’s speech. The BBC aims to prove Trump incited the Capitol riot, while Trump’s lawyers assert the case is about the BBC’s editing of his speech, not a trial of January 6th. This dispute unfolds as Trump faces other legal challenges regarding discovery processes in separate cases.
Read More
During an interview with NBC’s “Meet the Press,” President Donald Trump abruptly concluded the discussion. This interruption occurred when host Kristen Welker pressed him on his repeated false claims regarding past elections and the events of January 6, 2021. The interview, which aired Sunday, ended as Trump faced direct questioning about these contentious topics.
Read More
Mike Pence’s recent assertion that violent January 6th rioters, particularly those who may have been pardoned by former President Trump, “should never get a dime” strikes a chord, especially considering the context of the day’s events. It’s a sentiment that, while perhaps overdue for some, highlights a stark contrast to the actions and attitudes of others involved in that tumultuous period.
The idea that individuals who participated in the violent storming of the Capitol, threatening public officials and attempting to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power, should receive any financial support, let alone from taxpayers, is frankly preposterous. These were not peaceful protesters; they were individuals engaged in sedition, many of whom expressed outright hostility and a desire for violence.… Continue reading
It’s understandable that Mike Pence would feel the need to speak out about the current narrative surrounding January 6th. From his perspective, there’s a clear and concerted effort underway to reshape how that day is remembered, an attempt to essentially rewrite history. This isn’t just about differing interpretations; it’s about actively downplaying or outright denying the gravity of what transpired and the roles various figures played.
The core of Pence’s observation seems to be that a narrative is being pushed which significantly alters the reality of the events that unfolded. This proposed “rewrite” appears to involve minimizing the seriousness of the actions taken by the mob that stormed the Capitol and the pressure exerted on individuals like himself.… Continue reading
California is reportedly gearing up to impose a significant financial blow, with Governor Newsom announcing plans to levy a 100% tax on what’s being described as Donald Trump’s January 6th “slush fund.” This move, as articulated by the governor, aims to directly address the controversial origins and perceived misuse of these funds, signaling a strong stance from the state against the backdrop of past events. The intention behind such a substantial tax appears to be rooted in a desire to neutralize any financial benefit derived from what is characterized as a “slush fund,” effectively reclaiming those monies for public purposes or to mitigate damages associated with the events of January 6th.… Continue reading
The Trump administration has mass-deleted information regarding prosecutions from the January 6th Capitol attack, including cases involving violent assaults on police officers. Justice Department news releases detailing guilty pleas, verdicts, and sentences have disappeared from government websites, a move defended by the department as reversing perceived “weaponization” and partisan propaganda under the previous administration. This purge includes details on severe assaults, such as those involving electroshock devices, and attacks where officers were dragged into the mob. These deletions are part of a broader effort to reshape the narrative of the January 6th events, with President Trump frequently portraying his supporters as victims rather than perpetrators.
Read More
This week’s events have showcased a staggering act of corruption and apparent lawlessness under President Trump’s administration. Trump himself sued the IRS for $10 billion over leaked tax records, settling with himself to create a $1.8 billion slush fund potentially for January 6th rioters, while also granting his family virtual immunity from prosecution. However, this apparent unchecked power may be facing a turning point, as Republican lawmakers, recalling the events of January 6th, have begun to push back against Trump’s demands and “mafia-style” tactics, suggesting defiance might finally be outweighing accommodation.
Read More
Here’s a summarized version of the article, written as if it were part of the original text:
Republicans in Congress have halted a crucial funding bill for ICE operations, driven by a mutiny over Donald Trump’s proposed $1.8 billion “vengeance fund.” This move, reportedly stemming from a contentious meeting with Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, has jeopardized the $70 billion immigration enforcement package, with both House and Senate votes now likely delayed until after the Memorial Day recess. Lawmakers expressed significant hostility towards the fund, particularly concerning the potential eligibility of January 6th rioters for payouts, leading to the postponement of critical budgetary decisions.
Read More
The reported plan for President Trump to settle a lawsuit against his own administration by establishing a $1.7 billion compensation fund for political allies may be influenced by attorney Mark McCloskey. McCloskey, who gained notoriety for brandishing a rifle at protesters, now represents hundreds of January 6th rioters and has been advocating for such a fund. This proposed settlement, which would allegedly allow Trump control over the fund’s oversight commission, has drawn significant criticism from Democrats who decry it as a “slush fund” for insurrectionists. Republicans in Congress have largely remained silent on the matter, though House Speaker Mike Johnson previously expressed reservations about payouts for January 6th rioters.
Read More
Zachary Alam, a participant in the January 6th Capitol attack who received a presidential pardon, has been sentenced to seven years in prison after being convicted of burglary in Virginia. This conviction follows his earlier sentence for his role in the Capitol violence, where he was described as one of the most combative rioters. The recent burglary involved Alam breaking into a home, claiming to fix internet service, and then stealing electronics and jewelry before being apprehended. Prosecutors indicated that the presidential pardon may have emboldened Alam, but it did not shield him from state charges for his new crimes.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood