The reported plan for President Trump to settle a lawsuit against his own administration by establishing a $1.7 billion compensation fund for political allies may be influenced by attorney Mark McCloskey. McCloskey, who gained notoriety for brandishing a rifle at protesters, now represents hundreds of January 6th rioters and has been advocating for such a fund. This proposed settlement, which would allegedly allow Trump control over the fund’s oversight commission, has drawn significant criticism from Democrats who decry it as a “slush fund” for insurrectionists. Republicans in Congress have largely remained silent on the matter, though House Speaker Mike Johnson previously expressed reservations about payouts for January 6th rioters.
Read More
Zachary Alam, a participant in the January 6th Capitol attack who received a presidential pardon, has been sentenced to seven years in prison after being convicted of burglary in Virginia. This conviction follows his earlier sentence for his role in the Capitol violence, where he was described as one of the most combative rioters. The recent burglary involved Alam breaking into a home, claiming to fix internet service, and then stealing electronics and jewelry before being apprehended. Prosecutors indicated that the presidential pardon may have emboldened Alam, but it did not shield him from state charges for his new crimes.
Read More
It’s quite the headline, isn’t it? A prominent “MAGA” influencer found among over 200 individuals arrested in a significant prostitution sting operation in Polk County, Florida. This news really brings into sharp focus some of the recurring themes and perceived hypocrisies that often surface when discussing certain political circles. The immediate reaction for many, it seems, is a sense of “told you so,” or at the very least, a strong feeling that this aligns with a pattern of behavior.
The very idea of a “MAGA” influencer being involved in such an operation is, for some observers, not surprising at all. It’s often framed as a prime example of projection, where the very actions condemned by a group are, in fact, the ones its members engage in.… Continue reading
A federal judge ruled that former President Donald Trump’s speech at the Ellipse on January 6, 2021, was not part of his official duties and thus not covered by presidential immunity. This decision allows a civil lawsuit brought by Democratic lawmakers and others to proceed. The judge found that the organization and content of the rally, as well as a phone call to Georgia’s Secretary of State, pointed to actions taken by an office-seeker rather than an incumbent president fulfilling his official capacity. This ruling is seen by plaintiffs as a step towards holding the former president accountable for his conduct on that day.
Read More
A recent judicial ruling has made it clear that Donald Trump is not shielded from facing civil lawsuits stemming from his January 6th speech. This decision signifies a crucial moment, potentially opening the door for individuals and groups to seek redress for alleged harms connected to his rhetoric on that day. The idea that any citizen could potentially sue in a class-action capacity is a significant development, allowing for a collective voice and a unified pursuit of justice. It’s a notion that resonates with the desire for accountability, especially when it comes to the actions and words of powerful figures.
The implications of this ruling are far-reaching, especially for those who feel they have suffered damages due to the events of January 6th and the speech that preceded them.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood