The BBC has recently issued a significant number of subpoenas to individuals within Donald Trump’s inner circle. This legal maneuver is part of the BBC’s defense strategy in a massive $10 billion defamation lawsuit filed by Trump. The subpoenas target not only family members and former Cabinet officials but also extend to the Department of Justice and other federal agencies. The aim is to delve deeply into the former president’s mindset and intentions leading up to his January 6, 2021, speech at the Ellipse, a pivotal moment in recent American history. This action underscores a key aspect of the legal discovery process: plaintiffs, even those as prominent as a former president, are subject to scrutiny, and their motives and actions can be thoroughly examined.… Continue reading
Former Vice President Mike Pence has strongly denounced the Trump administration’s proposed $1.8 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund,” calling it “unacceptable” and “deeply offensive” for any taxpayer money to go to January 6 rioters. Pence, who was a target of the rioters, expressed hope that the administration would abandon the fund, intended to provide relief to those believing they were wrongfully prosecuted. This stance aligns with other Republicans, including Senators Mitch McConnell and Thom Tillis, who have joined Democrats in opposing the idea, emphasizing that those who assaulted officers should not receive any government funds.
Read More
The settlement reached by the executive branch requires certification of a legitimate legal claim, a standard this case fails to meet due to perceived collusion between the plaintiff and the government he controls. This action, by suing an IRS answering to him and subsequently agreeing to terms through a Trump appointee, effectively affirmed that the fund’s corpus is not taxable and that Trump receives no economic benefit. Beyond immediate financial considerations, a significant benefit for Trump lies in the official validation of his narrative that January 6 was lawful protest rather than insurrection, a premise woven throughout the fund’s establishment and criteria.
Read More
The Justice Department has removed press releases detailing criminal cases related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack from its website, labeling them “partisan propaganda.” These deletions come as part of an effort to reshape the narrative surrounding the events, with actions including sweeping clemency measures and a proposed fund to compensate individuals allegedly targeted by federal investigations. Critics argue this approach could benefit those involved in the Capitol riot, with some defendants now seeking significant payouts.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker