In a recent interview, Rep. Jamie Raskin discussed the Supreme Court’s current conservative alignment and its perceived efforts to accommodate Donald Trump. The conversation focused on the implications of the court’s rulings on nationwide injunctions, particularly the potential for widespread confusion if unconstitutional orders cannot be blocked on a national level. Raskin emphasized the need for these injunctions, highlighting the risk of legal chaos and the potential for lasting damage. The discussion underscored the critical role the Supreme Court plays in upholding the law and the potential consequences of its decisions.
Read More
Congressman Jamie Raskin’s request for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito to recuse himself from the Donald Trump case, following a reported phone call between the two, has ignited a firestorm of debate. The call itself raises serious questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly given the high stakes of the Trump case and Justice Alito’s known conservative leanings. Raskin’s call for recusal is a direct response to this perceived conflict, aiming to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
The lack of immediate action on Raskin’s request highlights a deeper concern about accountability within the Supreme Court. The perceived absence of consequences for Justice Alito’s actions underscores the limitations of existing mechanisms to address ethical breaches by Supreme Court justices.… Continue reading
This recent development regarding Jamie Raskin’s plan to kick Trump off the ballot is both intriguing and frustrating. On one hand, it’s refreshing to see a Democratic representative taking action and not backing down in the face of opposition. Raskin’s determination to push forward with legislation, despite the slim chances of success, is commendable. It’s a reminder that sometimes the fight for justice and democracy requires bold and unwavering action.
The Supreme Court’s ruling, which stated that Congress must pass a law to enforce the Fourteenth Amendment, sparked Raskin’s efforts to revive legislation that would disqualify individuals who committed insurrection. This move is crucial in holding those responsible for the Capitol insurrection, like Trump, accountable for their actions.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood