House Democrats are urging the White House to avoid any reprieve for Ghislaine Maxwell, with Rep. Jamie Raskin introducing a resolution opposing commutation, pardon, or clemency. This move follows reports of Maxwell preparing a commutation application, sparking concern given her 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. Although Trump has not explicitly ruled out a pardon, the political risk is significant, and the resolution serves as a symbolic message against clemency for Maxwell. Despite the resolution’s symbolic nature, its introduction underscores the seriousness of the issue and growing concern among lawmakers.
Read More
A prominent Democrat has accused the Trump administration of ending a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged co-conspirators, claiming it was a “shameful and gigantic cover-up”. The investigation, which reportedly involved interviews with nearly 50 women, was allegedly targeting a network of individuals involved in Epstein’s sex trafficking operation. Despite these testimonies identifying over 20 co-conspirators, the investigation was abruptly halted, and case files were transferred to the Justice Department’s headquarters. The Democrat is now requesting information on the investigative steps taken since then.
Read More
Rep. Jamie Raskin has sent a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi questioning the Trump Administration’s decision to abruptly end a criminal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell’s co-conspirators. The investigation, which was active until January 2025, involved nearly 50 survivors who provided detailed information to the SDNY prosecutors and FBI agents, identifying at least 20 co-conspirators. However, the DOJ and FBI closed the case in July 2025, citing a lack of evidence against uncharged third parties, despite the survivors’ credible testimonies and the previous reliance on their information to convict Ghislaine Maxwell. As a result, the House Judiciary Committee is seeking documents related to the investigation and considering reforms to the Crime Victims Rights Act.
Read More
In a recent letter, House Democrats Jamie Raskin and Robert Garcia warned President Trump against his efforts to secure $230 million in taxpayer funds from the Department of Justice. The congressmen asserted that such a move is both unconstitutional and illegal, citing the Domestic Emoluments Clause and the Federal Tort Claims Act. Trump is seeking these funds as compensation for past DOJ investigations, requiring approval from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and Civil Division head Stanley Woodward Jr., both of whom have previous ties to Trump. The letter condemns this as an attempt to steal from the American people and demands the White House provide extensive documentation related to the matter.
Read More
Ranking Member Jamie Raskin has sent letters to four major banks demanding records concerning over $1.5 billion in suspicious financial transactions linked to Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring. The letters were addressed to the CEOs of Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, Deutsche Bank, and JPMorgan Chase, seeking clarification on how Epstein and his associates utilized these banks to facilitate their criminal activities. The congressman pointed out the banks’ potential failure to comply with the Bank Secrecy Act by not filing timely Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs). Furthermore, the letters outlined specific requests for documents and information, with a deadline of October 22, to aid the committee’s investigation into Epstein’s financial dealings.
Read More
Rep. Jamie Raskin, a Jewish Democrat from Maryland, has joined a growing number of Democrats in support of the “Block the Bombs Act,” which would halt the transfer of offensive weapons to Israel. This move reflects a decline in Democratic support for Israel during the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Other Jewish Democratic lawmakers, like Rep. Sara Jacobs, Rep. Becca Balint, and Rep. Jan Schakowsky, have also endorsed the legislation. Raskin’s actions mark a departure from traditional support for Israel, as he previously called for a ceasefire and voted against additional aid to Israel during the war.
Read More
In a recent interview, Rep. Jamie Raskin discussed the pressing need to release the sealed files related to Jeffrey Epstein. Raskin emphasized the importance of ending the files’ potential use as a political tool and to ascertain the presence of substantive information, potentially involving the Trump administration. He believes the public deserves transparency to understand the scope of Epstein’s activities and the potential involvement of public figures. The congressman feels this release is crucial for public interest and accountability.
Read More
Amidst growing controversy surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case, Representative Jamie Raskin plans to urge House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi, FBI Director Kash Patel, and Deputy Director Dan Bongino for questioning. This comes after a DOJ memo revealed there was no secret client list, contradicting earlier claims and fueling backlash from various groups. Raskin’s call for a hearing aims to uncover the truth and address public concerns, particularly those related to President Trump’s involvement or potential withholding of information. This situation has led to resignation rumors and internal frustration within the White House, as officials grapple with the fallout from their handling of the Epstein case.
Read More
In a recent interview, Rep. Jamie Raskin discussed the Supreme Court’s current conservative alignment and its perceived efforts to accommodate Donald Trump. The conversation focused on the implications of the court’s rulings on nationwide injunctions, particularly the potential for widespread confusion if unconstitutional orders cannot be blocked on a national level. Raskin emphasized the need for these injunctions, highlighting the risk of legal chaos and the potential for lasting damage. The discussion underscored the critical role the Supreme Court plays in upholding the law and the potential consequences of its decisions.
Read More
Congressman Jamie Raskin’s request for Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito to recuse himself from the Donald Trump case, following a reported phone call between the two, has ignited a firestorm of debate. The call itself raises serious questions about potential conflicts of interest, particularly given the high stakes of the Trump case and Justice Alito’s known conservative leanings. Raskin’s call for recusal is a direct response to this perceived conflict, aiming to maintain the integrity of the judicial process.
The lack of immediate action on Raskin’s request highlights a deeper concern about accountability within the Supreme Court. The perceived absence of consequences for Justice Alito’s actions underscores the limitations of existing mechanisms to address ethical breaches by Supreme Court justices.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood