Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes initiated the trial by claiming that Jair Bolsonaro led a criminal organization aimed at reinstating a dictatorship in Brazil. The alleged plot involved a disinformation campaign and potential use of special forces assassins to seize power. Evidence presented suggested Bolsonaro attempted to undermine the electronic voting system and incite a military intervention after losing the 2022 election. The former president faces charges of leading an armed criminal organization and attempting a coup d’etat, which could result in a 43-year sentence.
Read More
The Brazilian Supreme Court commenced a five-day trial phase to determine the fate of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who faces a potential 43-year prison sentence for allegedly plotting a coup after losing the 2022 election. Judge Alexandre Moraes emphasized the court’s independence from external pressures, as Bolsonaro stands accused of attempting to establish a “real dictatorship” through a “criminal organization” seeking to overturn the election results. The charges include orchestrating a plan to declare a state of emergency and assassinate political rivals, with the court’s final decision expected by September 12. The proceedings, viewed as a critical test of democracy, have already sparked tension with the United States, while Bolsonaro’s supporters and detractors clashed outside his residence.
Read More
Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and seven allies, including high-ranking military officials, are on trial for allegedly attempting a coup, marking an unprecedented moment in Brazilian history. Accused of orchestrating a plot to overturn the 2022 election results, Bolsonaro faces potential decades in prison. The Supreme Court began the trial, with judges expected to render a verdict after televised hearings. Amidst the proceedings, former US President Donald Trump has intervened, imposing tariffs and sanctions in a bid to derail the trial, which has stirred both domestic and international debate on the maturity of Brazil’s democracy.
Read More
Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, currently under house arrest awaiting a verdict in his coup-plotting trial, is now under round-the-clock police surveillance, deemed a flight risk by Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes. This heightened security measure coincides with the upcoming final arguments in the case, where Bolsonaro faces a potential 40-year prison sentence if convicted of attempting to retain power after the 2022 election. The judge cited concerns about Bolsonaro’s son’s lobbying efforts in the United States and a draft asylum request, as well as the context of heightened tensions between the US and Brazil, which include visa revocations and criticisms of the trial.
Read More
Brazilian ex-president Jair Bolsonaro has been given 48 hours to explain police claims that he planned to flee to Argentina to avoid punishment for allegedly masterminding a failed coup. Court documents revealed a draft asylum request on Bolsonaro’s phone, which the police say indicates he planned to escape the country. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has demanded answers from Bolsonaro’s lawyers, as his trial for attempting to overthrow the 2022 election results is scheduled to conclude early next month, and a guilty verdict could lead to a prison sentence of over four decades. These events follow the formal accusation of Bolsonaro and his son, Eduardo, of interfering in his judgment, and the son’s alleged lobbying of US officials to pressure Brazil’s Supreme Court, leading to imposed tariffs and the loss of US visas for several judges.
Read More
Brazil’s Supreme Court Places Bolsonaro Under House Arrest, and it’s understandable that this news sparks a range of reactions. Some feel this is a positive step, a necessary measure to hold someone accountable. Others see it as a prelude to a more substantial reckoning, a recognition that actions have consequences, and perhaps justice is finally on the horizon. It’s a moment that captures attention and prompts reflection, doesn’t it?
Brazil’s Supreme Court Places Bolsonaro Under House Arrest is essentially a holding action, a way to curb certain behaviors. The core of the legal proceedings remains ongoing, and a final verdict and sentencing are still to come.… Continue reading
Brazil Supreme Court justice orders house arrest of former president Bolsonaro, and the world kind of collectively takes a breath. It’s a fascinating moment to watch, a collision of politics, justice, and the echoes of global power dynamics. The news itself is clear: Alexandre de Moraes, a justice on the Brazilian Supreme Court, has decided that former President Jair Bolsonaro will be confined to house arrest. This isn’t just a slap on the wrist; it’s a significant step with potentially far-reaching consequences.
Brazil Supreme Court justice orders house arrest of former president Bolsonaro, and the details paint a picture of a man increasingly hemmed in.… Continue reading
Brazil’s Supreme Court orders house arrest for former President Bolsonaro, a move that’s definitely capturing global attention. It’s hard not to be struck by the stark contrast in how Brazil has handled its own version of a January 6th-like incident, particularly when compared to the US. The reports of buses being utilized to collect rioters and transport them directly to the police station for immediate processing paint a picture of decisive action. It’s a stark contrast to the complexities and delays we’ve seen elsewhere. It makes you wonder, doesn’t it, if that level of swiftness and control could’ve altered the course of events?… Continue reading
The US Treasury Department, under the direction of Donald Trump, imposed sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, accusing him of human rights abuses and a political “witch-hunt”. Simultaneously, the US announced 50% tariffs on Brazilian imports, citing the government’s persecution of former president Jair Bolsonaro and his supporters. These actions, viewed as a direct attack on Brazilian democracy, were celebrated by Bolsonaro’s allies and condemned by members of President Lula da Silva’s government, who saw them as foreign interference in their justice system. Legal experts and human rights activists have expressed outrage and astonishment at the use of Magnitsky sanctions, typically reserved for severe human rights violators, against a judge in Brazil.
Read More
The US government, under the direction of former President Donald Trump, levied an additional 40% tariff on Brazilian products, bringing the total to 50%. This action was taken as a form of punishment for the Brazilian government’s perceived “witch hunt” against former President Jair Bolsonaro, a close ally of Trump. The tariffs, framed in overtly political terms, target Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who has clashed with Bolsonaro. US officials, citing human rights abuses and the undermining of the rule of law, announced sanctions and tariffs as a response to the ongoing investigation and trial.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood