Special Counsel Jack Smith and his team plan to resign before President-elect Donald Trump takes office, as the Justice Department generally does not charge sitting presidents with crimes. The looming question is whether Smith’s final report, detailing his charging decisions, will be made public before Inauguration Day. The report must be submitted to Attorney General Merrick Garland, who has the authority to release it. Although Smith’s office was moving forward with the election interference case against Trump, the Supreme Court’s ruling that Trump has immunity for some acts as president has hampered the investigation. Additionally, a case concerning classified documents was dismissed in July but remains on appeal.
Read More
Special counsel Jack Smith’s request to pause the criminal case against former President Donald Trump in order to assess an “unprecedented circumstance” has sparked a firestorm of reactions. The move, while seemingly intended to ensure a fair and thorough investigation, has been met with a mix of outrage, resignation, and even a touch of morbid humor.
Many critics see Smith’s request as a sign of weakness, a capitulation to Trump’s penchant for manipulating the legal system to his advantage. They argue that the case should proceed without delay, that any pause only emboldens Trump and his allies. They point to the numerous allegations against Trump, including his alleged involvement in the January 6th Capitol riot and his handling of classified documents, as evidence that a swift resolution is necessary.… Continue reading
With President-elect Trump’s victory, the two federal cases against him are likely to be dismissed or delayed due to a longstanding Justice Department policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Special counsel Jack Smith is taking steps to conclude both cases before Trump takes office. The cases include charges related to election interference in Washington, D.C., and the alleged mishandling of classified documents at Mar-a-Lago, Florida. While the latter case presents a more complex situation due to the involvement of other defendants and the potential impact on future special counsel appointments, the Justice Department may choose to abandon the appeal.
Read More
The audacity of Donald Trump, proclaiming that he would “fire” special counsel Jack Smith “in two seconds” if he were elected again, is nothing short of alarming. This isn’t just a throwaway remark. It’s a chilling indication of his intentions and a stark reminder of the fragility of our democratic institutions. In a society that prides itself on law and order, the thought of a former president openly discussing the dismissal of someone pursuing justice against him feels like a direct assault on the very principles that bind us as a nation. It’s baffling to watch a significant portion of the electorate support a figure who so brazenly promotes corruption and undermines accountability.… Continue reading
Jack Smith is on a mission to reveal the truth about Trump’s alleged criminal activities, and that’s a mission that deserves our attention. In a recent court filing, Smith argued against Trump’s presidential immunity, which has been a contentious issue since the Supreme Court’s decision in July. This filing marks a significant step forward in Smith’s case against Trump, and it sheds light on the complex legal battle that is unfolding.
It’s fascinating to see the lengths to which both parties are going to present their arguments. Smith’s document was filed under seal to protect sensitive information, while Trump’s attorneys are pushing for redacted filings.… Continue reading
Jack Smith’s latest win in Trump’s January 6 case brings a glimmer of hope to those seeking justice for the insurrection that unfolded at the Capitol. The legal battle, led by Trump’s team of Todd Blanche and John Lauro, has been one of delay tactics and cries of unfairness when faced with the reality of impending court proceedings. It’s almost ironic how swiftly justice can move when the playing field is level and the judge is not swayed by outside influences.
The 180-page brief presented by Smith promises to lay out the damning evidence against Trump in a clear and concise manner.… Continue reading
The anticipation is palpable as Special counsel Jack Smith gears up to present ‘substantial’ new evidence against former President Donald Trump in the January 6 case. Finally, the public will have a glimpse into the extensive investigation into Trump’s role in the 2020 election subversion and the Capitol attack. It’s been a long time coming, but the wait seems to be worth it as Judge Tanya Chutkan has given the green light for the Justice Department to reveal information not yet known to the public.
The significant court filing set to be presented on Thursday holds the potential to shed light on Trump’s interactions with then-Vice President Mike Pence and other crucial moments in late 2020 and early 2021.… Continue reading
Jack Smith is about to drop a bomb in the Trump case, legal experts say. A statement that has become all too familiar in the never-ending saga of Trump’s legal battles. The anticipation of powerful evidence being presented that could finally hold the former president accountable for his actions is both intriguing and frustrating. As someone who has followed these developments closely, I can’t help but feel a sense of deja vu with each new headline promising a bombshell revelation.
The Mueller report, which was touted as the ultimate expose on Trump’s wrongdoings, ultimately fell short of delivering the knockout blow many were hoping for.… Continue reading
The courtroom drama surrounding the federal election interference case against former President Donald Trump has taken a mysterious turn as Special Counsel Jack Smith has filed a sealed document hidden from public view and Trump’s legal team. This document, titled “Government’s Classified, Ex Parte, In Camera, and Under Seal Notice Regarding Classified Discovery,” signifies that the Department of Justice has submitted a confidential document containing classified information in this high-stakes case.
The classification of this document is so sensitive that it is restricted from public access due to security reasons. The term “Ex Parte” implies that only Judge Tanya Chutkan has been informed about the contents of this filing, with the defense left in the dark.… Continue reading
It’s undeniable that Jack Smith’s unwavering dedication to upholding the law and pursuing justice in the face of adversity is truly commendable. In a time when it seems like the privileged and powerful can evade accountability, individuals like Smith give hope that no one is above the law. His relentless pursuit of truth and justice, especially in the context of Trump’s legal entanglements, is a breath of fresh air in a climate where integrity seems to be in short supply.
The new indictment against Trump concerning the events of January 6th is a significant development, shedding light on potential crimes that have yet to be fully disclosed.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood