Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on his investigation into Donald Trump, pending a decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. This decision, which followed a request by Trump co-defendants, prevents the Justice Department from releasing the report, except for limited information shared with Congressional committees. Legal experts criticized Cannon’s order, arguing she lacks jurisdiction and her actions demonstrate bias, while Trump’s allies praised the decision. The Justice Department plans to release portions of the report concerning election interference only after the Eleventh Circuit rules on the matter.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith submitted his final report on the Trump investigations to Attorney General Merrick Garland. Garland intends to publicly release volume one, concerning Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, pending the Eleventh Circuit’s decision on a temporary injunction. Volume two, related to the classified documents case, will remain confidential to protect ongoing co-defendant cases, though limited access will be granted to Congressional leadership. The Justice Department is seeking to vacate the injunction, allowing for immediate release of volume one if the appeals court rules in their favor.
Read More
Judge Aileen Cannon blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, halting a process that would typically involve Attorney General Merrick Garland’s oversight. This action follows Trump’s legal victories, including a ruling deeming Smith’s appointment unconstitutional and a Supreme Court decision granting broad presidential immunity. Trump’s former co-defendants, Nauta and De Oliveira, successfully argued that the report’s release would prejudice their ongoing cases, prompting the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals to review Cannon’s order. The report’s public release is now delayed pending the appeals court’s decision.
Read More
Donald Trump’s lawyers reviewed a draft of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report and threaten legal action if it’s released, arguing Smith lacks the authority to do so due to a prior court ruling deeming his appointment unlawful. Co-defendants Nauta and De Oliveira, citing potential prejudice to their ongoing cases, joined the legal challenge, requesting Judge Cannon block the report’s release. The defense claims the draft presents a biased narrative, and insufficient redactions would further harm their ability to receive a fair trial. While the Justice Department plans to share a redacted version with Congress, Trump’s legal team seeks pre-release notification to pursue legal action.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s prosecutions of Donald Trump for election interference and classified document mishandling were ultimately unsuccessful, resulting in a significant victory for the president-elect. The federal cases were shelved due to Justice Department policy prohibiting the indictment or prosecution of sitting presidents, a decision that effectively exonerated Trump despite the gravity of the accusations. This outcome reinforces Trump’s belief in unchecked authority and carries profound implications for his upcoming term and future presidencies. The failure to hold Trump accountable represents a setback for the rule of law, potentially emboldening future presidents to engage in similar actions.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith moved to dismiss all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump concerning classified document mishandling and election interference. These dismissals stem from the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy prohibiting the indictment of a sitting president, a policy invoked previously during Trump’s first term and now applicable due to his re-election. While the government maintained the merits of its cases, the policy’s application necessitated the dismissal. This decision, following Supreme Court rulings bolstering presidential immunity, marks a significant moment, leaving the pursuit of accountability for these alleged actions to Congress via impeachment.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith dropped all federal charges against President-elect Donald Trump regarding mishandling classified documents and attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This decision, citing the Department of Justice’s longstanding policy against indicting a sitting president, comes despite the gravity of the alleged crimes. Conservative judicial rulings, including a Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity, significantly impacted the case’s dismissal. The DOJ’s policy, established during Watergate, prioritizes a president’s ability to perform their duties unimpeded by legal proceedings, ultimately preventing further prosecution. Smith’s team plans to resign before Trump’s inauguration.
Read More
President-elect Trump plans to dismiss attorneys who worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith’s investigations into his handling of classified documents and the January 6th Capitol riot, many of whom are career professionals typically protected from such actions. Simultaneously, he intends to form teams to investigate alleged 2020 election fraud, despite a lack of evidence. Trump justifies these actions by claiming the Department of Justice was weaponized against him, and intends to reinstate executive order Schedule F to facilitate the removal of government employees. Legal experts, however, note that reinstating Schedule F could face significant legal challenges.
Read More
Special counsel Jack Smith is expected to conclude his investigations into President-elect Trump’s criminal cases before Trump’s inauguration. Smith may issue a comprehensive report detailing the evidence gathered, potentially circumventing the inability to prosecute a sitting president. This report could be released even if the cases are dismissed, as Attorney General Garland has indicated he would release any such report. The possibility of self-pardons and the legal implications are still unresolved.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith is concluding his investigations into Donald Trump, facing a tight deadline before Trump’s potential inauguration. Two cases are involved: one concerning Trump’s actions related to the January 6th insurrection and another regarding classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Smith must submit a final report to Attorney General Garland, who will then decide on public release, though Trump’s potential retribution looms large. The reports’ contents, including classified information and grand jury materials, will be closely watched, especially considering Trump’s threats and the uncertain future of the investigations.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker