Former special counsel Jack Smith expressed deep concern regarding the current state of the rule of law, stating it is “under attack” like never before. Smith highlighted instances of the Justice Department’s diminished credibility, citing the dismissal of career public servants and the perceived erosion of nonpartisan enforcement. He noted that political opponents and perceived enemies are targeted for investigation, while those close to the president face no such scrutiny. Smith’s remarks emphasized the critical importance of equal application and enforcement of the law for all citizens.
Read More
Office of Special Counsel says it’s opened Hatch Act probe of Jack Smith, and the immediate reaction is a mixture of disbelief and a bit of dark humor. It’s hard to ignore the irony, isn’t it? The same folks who arguably turned the Hatch Act into a punchline during the Trump administration are now turning their attention to a special counsel investigating the former president. It’s like a scene straight out of a political satire.
The core issue, of course, is the Hatch Act itself. This law is designed to keep federal employees from using their positions to influence elections. It’s about maintaining a sense of impartiality and preventing the government from being overtly partisan.… Continue reading
Former special counsel Jack Smith is now under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel for alleged violations of the Hatch Act, following requests from Senator Tom Cotton. The investigation stems from accusations that Smith attempted to influence the 2024 presidential election by accelerating proceedings in Trump’s election interference case. Cotton alleges Smith, a registered independent voter, was acting on behalf of Democrats. Smith’s indictment against Trump for actions related to the 2020 election results spurred the investigation, though Smith ultimately dismissed the case after Trump won the 2024 election.
Read More
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is investigating former special counsel Jack Smith following allegations by former President Donald Trump and other Republicans that Smith engaged in illegal political activity during his investigations. The OSC is examining potential violations of the Hatch Act, though specific evidence of wrongdoing hasn’t been provided by Trump and his allies. The OSC, an independent agency, can recommend disciplinary actions like removal from federal service or refer findings to the Department of Justice but cannot bring criminal charges. Senator Tom Cotton requested the investigation, citing “unprecedented interference in the 2024 election.”
Read More
President Trump ordered the suspension of security clearances for Covington & Burling lawyers who provided pro bono legal services to Special Counsel Jack Smith. This action, part of Trump’s broader campaign of retribution against those involved in investigating him, targets the firm despite their assertion that they only represented Smith personally. The memo, directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, cites concerns about the “weaponization of the judicial process,” echoing Republican claims of partisan bias within the Justice Department. This follows previous attempts by Trump to revoke clearances from perceived political opponents.
Read More
Trump’s recent executive action targeting Covington and Burling LLP, the law firm representing former Special Counsel Jack Smith, is a blatant escalation of his attacks against perceived political enemies. The sheer transparency of this action is shocking; there’s no pretense of adhering to established norms or legal processes. The firm, which represents Smith in a personal capacity, vehemently denies any involvement in Smith’s investigations of Trump.
This memo, signed by Trump, directs the Office of Management and Budget to scrutinize all government contracts held by the firm. Beyond that, the action goes even further; it strips Smith’s attorney, along with any other firm attorneys who assisted Smith during his investigations, of their security clearances.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report, released Tuesday, details irrefutable evidence of a criminal scheme by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 election. The report, based on extensive witness testimony and investigation, reveals Trump’s awareness of the falsity of his fraud claims and his efforts to obstruct justice through witness intimidation and executive privilege. Rep. Jamie Raskin highlighted the report’s findings, emphasizing Trump’s months-long plot to subvert election results and the House Republicans’ role in hindering accountability. Despite the Justice Department’s decision to drop the case, the report underscores the gravity of Trump’s actions.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. Contributions may lead to impactful investigative journalism. All tips are treated with confidentiality. Contact information is readily available on the website.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s election interference has been released, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for a conviction had Trump not been president. The report details Trump’s alleged attempts to subvert the election results after lawful challenges failed. Trump vehemently denied the report’s findings, issuing a series of false and misleading statements online. Despite having access to a draft report for over a week, Trump’s response consisted of unsubstantiated accusations and claims of a politically motivated prosecution. A separate report regarding classified documents remains pending.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report details the investigation into President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for conviction. However, Trump’s subsequent election rendered prosecution impossible due to Department of Justice policy against indicting sitting presidents. The report also reveals consideration of more serious charges under the Insurrection Act, ultimately forgone. Despite Trump’s legal challenges and claims of a politically motivated investigation, the report was released, detailing threats against witnesses and officials stemming from Trump’s public statements.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood