Every day, I wake up and read the latest about the ongoing trial between Jack Smith and The Federalist Society via Cannon. The more I delve into the details, the more apparent it becomes that something is gravely amiss with the handling of this case. The idea that a judge, particularly one appointed by a figure as divisive as Donald Trump, could be allowing personal biases to interfere with the due process of the law is both appalling and infuriating.
It’s no secret that the judiciary in recent years has been tainted by the influence of partisan politics. The judges selected by Trump and Mitch McConnell have raised serious concerns about the integrity and impartiality of the legal system.… Continue reading
I am absolutely appalled by the recent actions of Mar-a-Lago judge Aileen Cannon in scolding Jack Smith and promptly shutting down Trump’s gag demand, while threatening sanctions. It is alarming to witness a judge who appears to prioritize protecting Trump over upholding the law. The level of bias and favoritism demonstrated is truly disgraceful.
Cannon’s swift response to the situation reeks of corruption and manipulation. It is deeply troubling to see a judge who should be impartial and fair showing such blatant disregard for justice. The way she dismisses federal prosecutors and sides with Trump without hesitation raises serious concerns about her integrity and professionalism.… Continue reading
Jack Smith has had enough. He is fed up with Judge Cannon and her blatant enabling of Donald Trump’s delay tactics. It’s clear as day that she is playing a dangerous game, choosing to delay the legal process for Trump rather than doing her job and ensuring justice is served. The fact that she got defensive when Smith asked her to explain her flawed jury instructions speaks volumes about her intentions.
It’s frustrating to see a judge who is supposed to be impartial and uphold the law show such blatant bias. Cannon’s actions are not only unethical but damaging to the integrity of the legal system.… Continue reading
Jack Smith is not holding back in his criticism of Judge Aileen Cannon’s recent ruling, and it’s hard to blame him. In a filing to Cannon, Smith expressed his concerns about publicly docketing unredacted discovery material, as it could potentially expose witnesses to threats and harassment. Smith argues that revealing the identities of witnesses in a case involving Trump, who has a history of intimidating individuals, would put their safety at risk. He points to previous cases involving classified evidence, such as United States v. Moussaoui in 2001, where restrictions were placed on access to classified information to protect national security.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker