Jack Smith’s possible future actions are sparking a lot of discussion, particularly given the current political climate. The core of this buzz revolves around whether the charges against Donald Trump, which were previously dismissed, could be revisited and brought again. This question hangs heavily in the air, stirring both anticipation and a sense of “it’s about time” amongst many observers.
The sentiment is strong that these charges *should* be pursued, and the reasons cited are numerous and varied. The feeling is that Trump’s actions over the past few decades, spanning political, economic, and social arenas, have warranted serious legal consequences. The sheer volume of potential offenses, the argument goes, is almost unfathomable.… Continue reading
Jack Smith tells Congress Trump was guilty ‘beyond a reasonable doubt,’ and frankly, it feels like stating the obvious. The sheer volume of evidence, the testimonies, the actions witnessed by the entire nation – it all points in one undeniable direction. The January 6th Congressional Hearings laid it all out for everyone to see. The depth of the alleged crimes, the blatant disregard for the law, and the impact on the foundations of democracy are all alarming.
The fact that there’s a debate over Trump’s guilt feels absurd. We saw the footage, we heard the words, and we witnessed the aftermath.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith asserted that Donald Trump engaged in criminal activity. Smith’s investigation revealed that Trump was not seeking truthful information regarding the 2020 election results, and Smith’s office did not engage in any spying activities. Legal experts analyzed Smith’s testimony and his ongoing cases against Trump, with many noting Smith’s composed demeanor. Discussions surrounding Trump’s potential use of military force were also addressed, specifically concerning Greenland.
Read More
In his first public testimony before the House Judiciary Committee, former Special Counsel Jack Smith defended his decision to bring criminal charges against Donald Trump. Smith stated that he stood by his decisions, asserting that the investigation revealed proof beyond a reasonable doubt of Trump’s criminal activity. He elaborated on the charges, mentioning Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and the illegal retention of classified documents, including sensitive national security information stored in insecure locations. Smith emphasized his commitment to the rule of law, indicating that he would prosecute a former president based on the same facts today and that no one should be above the law.
Read More
President Trump is seeking a court order to block the Justice Department from releasing the second volume of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concerning the 2020 election and classified documents. The motion argues that the release would expose sensitive grand jury materials and privileged information. The first volume focused on election obstruction, while the unreleased second volume focuses on the handling of classified documents. Trump’s motion cites previous rulings that dismissed charges against him, and claims Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional.
Read More
Several reports highlight growing concerns about Donald Trump’s actions and their consequences. There are criticisms of Trump’s foreign policy, questioning the trustworthiness of the United States by its allies. Domestically, there is scrutiny of his immigration policies and Justice Department, with allegations of prioritizing loyalty over competence. Furthermore, the article references fact-checking of Trump’s inauguration pledges, suggesting broken promises.
Read More
“The Illegal News” provides weekly analysis where law intersects with politics. Hosted by Bulwark publisher Sarah Longwell, the show features legal experts who break down Trump-era court proceedings. The podcast aims to simplify complex legal matters, offering context for significant developments and highlighting less-publicized legal actions. While George Conway is pursuing other ventures, Longwell continues to provide coverage.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith is set to testify publicly before the House Judiciary Committee next week, following a closed-door deposition in December regarding his investigations into Donald Trump. This public hearing was requested by Smith before the initial deposition, which focused on Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election and the mishandling of classified documents. During the closed-door deposition, Smith stated he could prove Trump’s “criminal scheme” beyond a reasonable doubt and that Trump was “the most culpable” in the election interference case. The upcoming hearing marks a significant development in the ongoing legal scrutiny of the former president.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith, overseeing investigations into Donald Trump, testified in a closed-door hearing, maintaining his decision to prosecute Trump regardless of political affiliation. Next week’s public hearing anticipates Republican attempts to discredit Smith, accusing him of bias. Democrats are expected to focus on the evidence gathered against Trump. Smith has expressed a desire to publicly share the election investigation’s findings but is currently restricted by the Department of Justice.
Read More
The timeline provided by the website omits critical details of the January 6th Capitol attack, including the discovery of bombs and the initial breach by supporters. It neglects to mention that the events led to a lockdown and chants for violence against lawmakers. While Trump did tweet a call for peace, the White House’s account fails to acknowledge that this was after the Capitol was already breached and after Trump criticized Vice President Pence for not overturning the election results.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker