The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency request to prevent the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election. However, a temporary injunction remains in place for three days, and further legal challenges are anticipated. While the election interference portion of the report is targeted for release, the section concerning classified documents at Mar-a-Lago will remain sealed due to ongoing prosecutions of co-defendants. Trump’s spokesperson condemned the report as politically motivated, while the Justice Department has followed precedent by making such reports public in the past.
Read More
Following a federal appeals court decision, the Justice Department urgently requested the immediate release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election. This request counters a judge’s ruling delaying release until at least Sunday, a delay the Justice Department deemed erroneous. While the report’s release is currently pending, Trump’s potential Supreme Court appeal could further postpone its publication. The report details evidence supporting the charges against Trump, which were dropped following his election victory but which the Attorney General stated are in the public interest to disclose.
Read More
The Justice Department secured permission to release Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report detailing President-elect Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, though a three-day delay remains pending potential Supreme Court intervention. This ruling comes as the Supreme Court also allowed Trump’s New York hush-money case sentencing to proceed. Trump faces multiple indictments related to election interference, including conspiracy to defraud the United States. While Attorney General Garland intends to release the election interference section of the report, volume two concerning classified documents will remain unreleased pending related cases.
Read More
Garland’s intention to release a portion of Jack Smith’s report concerning the January 6th probe has sparked considerable outrage and skepticism. The timing, three years after the events in question, is viewed by many as far too late, fueling accusations of deliberate inaction and a lack of commitment to accountability. This delayed release reinforces a sense of profound disappointment in the Attorney General, with some questioning his overall effectiveness and suggesting his actions are too little, too late.
The decision to release only a portion of the report, specifically Volume 1 covering the DC case on Trump’s attempts to overturn the election, is met with significant criticism.… Continue reading
Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, temporarily blocked the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report investigating President-elect Trump, prompting immediate criticism. This action follows Cannon’s earlier dismissal of the classified documents case against Trump. Legal analyst Lisa Rubin argued Cannon lacks jurisdiction to issue such a stay, given her prior ruling. The stay remains in effect until three days after the appeals court rules on the matter, a timeline raising questions about its potential duration beyond Trump’s inauguration. The report’s release is opposed by Trump and his co-defendants.
Read More
The Justice Department intends to release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election, but will withhold the section concerning classified documents at Mar-a-Lago while charges against Trump co-defendants remain pending. This decision follows a judge’s temporary block on the report’s release. The department argues the release of the election interference portion is justified and will be shared with congressional leaders, while the classified documents section will remain confidential to protect the co-defendants’ interests. The Justice Department is appealing the judge’s order, seeking to release the election interference findings completely.
Read More
Garland prepares to release Jack Smith’s report on the 2020 election subversion case against Trump, a development that has generated a wide spectrum of reactions, ranging from impatient anticipation to cynical skepticism. Many express frustration over the perceived delay, questioning why the release isn’t happening sooner, with some believing the report’s impact will be diminished by the timing. The protracted timeline fuels concerns about the effectiveness of the Department of Justice and leads to accusations of foot-dragging.
Garland’s perceived slow pace in releasing the report has prompted intense criticism. Some observers satirically detail the Attorney General’s imagined slow movements, emphasizing the drawn-out process and suggesting deliberate delay tactics.… Continue reading
A federal judge temporarily halted the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on investigations into Donald Trump, pending an appeals court decision. This action, prompted by an emergency request from Trump’s defense team citing potential prejudice, follows a pattern of rulings favorable to Trump by the Trump-appointed judge. The report details charging decisions in two cases—the Mar-a-Lago documents case and the 2020 election interference case—both of which were impacted by legal challenges and the Justice Department’s policy against prosecuting sitting presidents. The Justice Department’s next steps remain unclear following the judge’s order.
Read More
Trump urges Attorney General Merrick Garland to block the release of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report, a move that has ignited intense debate. The former president’s request is seen by many as a blatant attempt to suppress potentially damaging information, highlighting a deep-seated distrust in the justice system’s ability to hold powerful individuals accountable.
This request underscores a pattern of behavior where Trump repeatedly attempts to obstruct investigations into his actions. The sheer audacity of the request is remarkable, revealing a profound disregard for transparency and the principles of accountability that should govern public officials. It fuels existing suspicions about a potential cover-up and further erodes public trust.… Continue reading
Readers are encouraged to submit news tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is straightforward and confidential, allowing for the sharing of important information. All tips will be reviewed by the editorial team. This ensures a reliable and responsive platform for sharing news leads.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood