In a recent spending bill, a provision allows GOP senators to sue the federal government over the lawful search of their phone records as part of the January 6th investigation, potentially costing taxpayers up to $500,000 per senator. Trump’s recent pardons, which are seen as a precursor for future election denialism, have also sparked controversy, as well as the ongoing preferential treatment of the politically connected and corrupt. Additionally, the Trump administration faces legal challenges and is under scrutiny for its actions on deportation, military actions, and diplomatic decisions.
Read More
In a recent Truth Social post, former President Donald Trump called for the prosecution of several Biden administration officials, including Jack Smith, Merrick Garland, Christopher Wray, and Lisa Monaco, over their alleged involvement in the investigation into the 2020 election. Trump claimed these officials were involved in an operation that spied on members of Congress and rigged the election, though the documents he referenced are unclear. This call for prosecution comes after the Senate Judiciary Committee released documents revealing the FBI’s analysis of phone records of Republican members of Congress during the investigation into the January 6th Capitol attack. Trump has previously expressed animosity towards Smith, and other GOP members have requested the Department of Justice investigate him.
Read More
In a recent Truth Social post, former President Trump called for the prosecution of several Biden-era Justice Department officials, including Merrick Garland and Christopher Wray. Trump’s accusations stem from an FBI probe known as Arctic Frost, which involved the scrutiny of Republican lawmakers’ phone records related to the 2020 election fallout. The former president claimed these officials engaged in illegal and unethical behavior without specifying the exact crimes committed. This follows a pattern of Trump urging prosecution against individuals he views as political adversaries, amid ongoing investigations into his actions and legal challenges against him.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested the opportunity to testify publicly before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees in response to accusations of politically motivated prosecutions from House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan. Smith’s legal team stated his willingness to address allegations surrounding his investigations into former President Trump, contingent on Justice Department guidance to avoid violating grand jury secrecy. This request comes as Jordan demanded a closed-door interview with Smith, claiming the special counsel aimed to silence Trump. Notably, Smith recently defended his team’s apolitical nature and commitment to public service in an interview with former prosecutor Andrew Weissmann.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith is seeking to testify publicly before Congress about the investigations leading to criminal charges against Donald Trump. Smith believes public hearings are necessary due to “mischaracterizations” surrounding his work and wants to defend the integrity of his investigations. However, Smith requires assurances from the Justice Department that he won’t face repercussions for revealing information still under seal or protected by grand jury secrecy. Furthermore, Smith is requesting access to files created during his tenure as special counsel to ensure full and accurate answers.
Read More
In 2023, a 40-count felony indictment was brought against Trump concerning the handling of classified documents after his presidency. Despite the government’s attempts to retrieve the documents before initiating a criminal investigation, and even after the investigation began, Trump allegedly refused to return them and attempted to obstruct the investigation. This case was ultimately dismissed when Trump won the election in 2024. Consequently, it is unlikely Trump will face repercussions for his actions, as he continues to attack those who investigated him.
Read More
Former special counsel Jack Smith expressed deep concern regarding the current state of the rule of law, stating it is “under attack” like never before. Smith highlighted instances of the Justice Department’s diminished credibility, citing the dismissal of career public servants and the perceived erosion of nonpartisan enforcement. He noted that political opponents and perceived enemies are targeted for investigation, while those close to the president face no such scrutiny. Smith’s remarks emphasized the critical importance of equal application and enforcement of the law for all citizens.
Read More
Office of Special Counsel says it’s opened Hatch Act probe of Jack Smith, and the immediate reaction is a mixture of disbelief and a bit of dark humor. It’s hard to ignore the irony, isn’t it? The same folks who arguably turned the Hatch Act into a punchline during the Trump administration are now turning their attention to a special counsel investigating the former president. It’s like a scene straight out of a political satire.
The core issue, of course, is the Hatch Act itself. This law is designed to keep federal employees from using their positions to influence elections. It’s about maintaining a sense of impartiality and preventing the government from being overtly partisan.… Continue reading
Former special counsel Jack Smith is now under investigation by the Office of Special Counsel for alleged violations of the Hatch Act, following requests from Senator Tom Cotton. The investigation stems from accusations that Smith attempted to influence the 2024 presidential election by accelerating proceedings in Trump’s election interference case. Cotton alleges Smith, a registered independent voter, was acting on behalf of Democrats. Smith’s indictment against Trump for actions related to the 2020 election results spurred the investigation, though Smith ultimately dismissed the case after Trump won the 2024 election.
Read More
The U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) is investigating former special counsel Jack Smith following allegations by former President Donald Trump and other Republicans that Smith engaged in illegal political activity during his investigations. The OSC is examining potential violations of the Hatch Act, though specific evidence of wrongdoing hasn’t been provided by Trump and his allies. The OSC, an independent agency, can recommend disciplinary actions like removal from federal service or refer findings to the Department of Justice but cannot bring criminal charges. Senator Tom Cotton requested the investigation, citing “unprecedented interference in the 2024 election.”
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood