President Trump ordered the suspension of security clearances for Covington & Burling lawyers who provided pro bono legal services to Special Counsel Jack Smith. This action, part of Trump’s broader campaign of retribution against those involved in investigating him, targets the firm despite their assertion that they only represented Smith personally. The memo, directed at Attorney General Pam Bondi, cites concerns about the “weaponization of the judicial process,” echoing Republican claims of partisan bias within the Justice Department. This follows previous attempts by Trump to revoke clearances from perceived political opponents.
Read More
Trump’s recent executive action targeting Covington and Burling LLP, the law firm representing former Special Counsel Jack Smith, is a blatant escalation of his attacks against perceived political enemies. The sheer transparency of this action is shocking; there’s no pretense of adhering to established norms or legal processes. The firm, which represents Smith in a personal capacity, vehemently denies any involvement in Smith’s investigations of Trump.
This memo, signed by Trump, directs the Office of Management and Budget to scrutinize all government contracts held by the firm. Beyond that, the action goes even further; it strips Smith’s attorney, along with any other firm attorneys who assisted Smith during his investigations, of their security clearances.… Continue reading
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report, released Tuesday, details irrefutable evidence of a criminal scheme by Donald Trump to overturn the 2020 election. The report, based on extensive witness testimony and investigation, reveals Trump’s awareness of the falsity of his fraud claims and his efforts to obstruct justice through witness intimidation and executive privilege. Rep. Jamie Raskin highlighted the report’s findings, emphasizing Trump’s months-long plot to subvert election results and the House Republicans’ role in hindering accountability. Despite the Justice Department’s decision to drop the case, the report underscores the gravity of Trump’s actions.
Read More
Readers are encouraged to submit tips to The Daily Beast. The submission process is streamlined for ease of use. Contributions may lead to impactful investigative journalism. All tips are treated with confidentiality. Contact information is readily available on the website.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s election interference has been released, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for a conviction had Trump not been president. The report details Trump’s alleged attempts to subvert the election results after lawful challenges failed. Trump vehemently denied the report’s findings, issuing a series of false and misleading statements online. Despite having access to a draft report for over a week, Trump’s response consisted of unsubstantiated accusations and claims of a politically motivated prosecution. A separate report regarding classified documents remains pending.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s final report details the investigation into President-elect Trump’s alleged attempts to overturn the 2020 election, concluding that sufficient evidence existed for conviction. However, Trump’s subsequent election rendered prosecution impossible due to Department of Justice policy against indicting sitting presidents. The report also reveals consideration of more serious charges under the Insurrection Act, ultimately forgone. Despite Trump’s legal challenges and claims of a politically motivated investigation, the report was released, detailing threats against witnesses and officials stemming from Trump’s public statements.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that Donald Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election constituted criminal efforts to retain power, including attempts to induce state officials to falsify vote counts and pressure the Vice President. Had Trump not won the 2024 election, the report asserts sufficient evidence existed for a conviction. Trump vehemently denies the findings, attacking Smith’s integrity and alleging the House Select Committee illegally destroyed evidence. Smith, having resigned, defended his investigation’s impartiality and adherence to the law.
Read More
Special Counsel Jack Smith’s report concludes that sufficient evidence existed to convict President-elect Donald Trump for attempting to overturn the 2020 election results, had he not been re-elected in 2024. The Department of Justice report details Trump’s alleged efforts, including spreading false claims of election fraud and inciting violence. Smith’s investigation faced significant challenges, including Trump’s use of social media to influence witnesses and legal proceedings. However, the DOJ’s policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president precluded further action.
Read More
A judge has ruled that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can release Jack Smith’s final report on his January 6th case against Donald Trump. This decision comes after a period of legal wrangling, and it represents a significant development in the ongoing saga surrounding the former president and the events leading up to and during the Capitol riot.
The ruling clears the path for the public to finally access the details of Smith’s investigation into Trump’s alleged actions in the lead-up to and during the January 6th insurrection. This has been a highly anticipated event, with many eagerly awaiting the release of the report to understand the full scope of the findings.… Continue reading
Judge Aileen Cannon will allow the release of special counsel Jack Smith’s report on Donald Trump’s attempts to overturn the 2020 election, but temporarily blocked disclosure of the classified documents section pending a hearing. This decision follows Trump’s legal challenges delaying the report’s publication, despite the Justice Department’s historical practice of releasing such reports. While the election interference volume may be released soon, the classified documents portion remains under court-ordered restriction, potentially jeopardizing congressional and public access to these investigations. Trump and his team have yet to indicate whether they will appeal the ruling.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood