The US has requested Lebanon return an undetonated GBU-39 bomb, a Boeing-manufactured glide bomb capable of traveling up to 110 km, due to concerns it could fall into the hands of Russia or China. This request follows the discovery of the unexploded bomb. The US fears the technology could be reverse-engineered by rival nations.
The United States is focusing on Lebanon to diminish Iranian funding to Hezbollah and encourage the group’s disarmament. Despite Western sanctions, Iran has funneled approximately $1 billion to Hezbollah this year, according to the US Treasury Department’s top sanctions official, John Hurley. The US aims to eliminate Iranian influence through financial pressure, as evidenced by sanctions on individuals involved in funding Hezbollah. This strategy is part of a broader “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran’s regional influence.
Hannibal Gadhafi, son of the late Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi, was released from Lebanese custody on Monday after paying a $900,000 bail. This release followed a reduction in bail and the lifting of a travel ban, stemming from his 2015 detention related to the disappearance of Lebanese cleric Moussa al-Sadr. The bail was reportedly paid by a Libyan delegation, and Gadhafi’s defense team withdrew a case against the Lebanese state. Gadhafi had been held in Lebanon for ten years, accused of withholding information about al-Sadr, who disappeared in Libya in 1978.
According to AP News, conflicting reports have emerged regarding an incident involving an Israeli drone in southern Lebanon. The Israeli army stated the drone, conducting routine reconnaissance, was downed near UNIFIL peacekeepers, adding that a hand grenade was thrown by Israeli forces after the drone was shot down. Conversely, UNIFIL reported the drone flew over a patrol “in an aggressive manner”, prompting defensive measures, followed by a dropped grenade and tank fire from Israel. This event occurred as tensions escalate amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hezbollah.
During an interview with TIME magazine, former President Trump claimed involvement in the 2024 pager attacks in Lebanon, which were orchestrated by Israeli operatives and resulted in numerous casualties. While initially attributing his comments to a misunderstanding, the White House later confirmed Trump’s support for the attacks, which targeted Hezbollah and caused widespread devastation. This admission, however, was quickly followed by criticism from the White House regarding the attack on Qatar last month. The former president’s statement has raised questions about his cognitive abilities, especially following other recent instances of confusion in his public appearances.
An Israeli drone strike in southern Lebanon resulted in the deaths of five people, including three children and their father, who were US citizens. The Israeli military claimed the target was a Hezbollah terrorist operating among civilians, acknowledging civilian casualties and stating a review of the incident would be conducted. Lebanese officials, including President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, condemned the attack, with Aoun calling on international pressure to halt Israeli actions, and Salam stating the attack was meant to intimidate people returning to their villages. This incident comes amidst a complex situation where the US-brokered ceasefire has not been fully effective, with Israel still occupying some Lebanese territory, and Hezbollah claiming that ongoing strikes justify their refusal to disarm.
Lebanon says it is beginning disarmament of Palestinian factions in refugee camps. This is the crux of the matter, and it’s a complex situation with a long history behind it. The fact that the Lebanese government is even *attempting* this is significant, and it speaks volumes about the shifting power dynamics in the region. For years, these refugee camps have essentially been extra-territorial zones, operating largely outside the control of the Lebanese state. The Lebanese security forces would maintain checkpoints at the entrances, but the camps themselves were governed by Palestinian factions.
Now, the Lebanese government is stepping in to change that, which includes attempting to disarm these factions within the camps.… Continue reading
Hezbollah’s leader issued a stark warning to Lebanon, stating there would be “no life” if the government confronted the group. This follows President Joseph Aoun’s statement to an Iranian official that no Lebanese group is allowed to possess weapons or depend on foreign support. The warning suggests a firm stance against any attempts to disarm or limit Hezbollah’s influence in the country. The group’s leader’s remarks highlight the ongoing tension regarding Hezbollah’s role in Lebanon.
Hezbollah has strongly criticized the Lebanese government’s decision to task the army with establishing a state monopoly on arms, viewing it as a “grave sin” and a move that serves Israel’s interests. The group, backed by Iran, claims the decision is the result of US pressure and undermines Lebanon’s sovereignty. Hezbollah has declared it will treat the decision as if it doesn’t exist, with Shiite ministers reportedly walking out of the cabinet session in protest. Despite the conflict, the group says it remains open to discussing a broader national security strategy.
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun has intensified calls for Hezbollah to disarm, emphasizing the need for the Lebanese government to have exclusive control over weapons. This stance comes after Hezbollah’s secretary-general declared the group would not relinquish its arms, deeming them crucial for Lebanon’s defense. The United States has reportedly linked Hezbollah’s disarmament to international aid and Israel’s withdrawal from southern Lebanon, with a deadline set for November 2025. Meanwhile, France has also pressured Lebanon to consider Hezbollah’s disarmament, as the country also struggles to deal with internal conflict and international pressure.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood