The court found that the lawsuit’s aim was to legitimize an agreement granting immunity to individuals and entities connected to the President and to divert taxpayer funds for undefined grievances. Consequently, any party involved in the settlement, including the Treasury Department and the IRS, is barred from referencing the arrangement in official capacities. Furthermore, the president’s attorney was referred to the Florida bar for potential disciplinary action, and the court observed that the legal action was initiated only after the president returned to office.
Read More
It’s quite something to consider the situation where a former President, Donald Trump, not only sued his own government but subsequently reached a settlement involving nearly $2 billion and, perhaps most astonishingly, a supposed “forever” ban on the IRS auditing his family or businesses. This entire scenario raises a cascade of questions and concerns about accountability, the rule of law, and the integrity of our financial and governmental systems.
The core of this issue revolves around a substantial fund, reportedly around $1.8 billion, designated as an “anti-weaponization” fund. What makes this particularly jarring is the alleged intention for some of these funds to be directed towards political allies, and even, as Trump himself has reportedly indicated, potentially to those involved in the January 6th events.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood