While the Trump administration touted the U.S. airstrikes on Iran as a major blow to its nuclear program, new intelligence suggests the impact was far less significant. Operation Midnight Hammer, involving B-2 bombers and “bunker buster” bombs, targeted Iranian facilities in an effort to halt nuclear weapons development. However, according to sources briefed on the operation, the strikes likely only delayed Iran’s progress by a matter of months, with key components like enriched uranium stockpiles and centrifuges largely intact. The White House has disputed this assessment, calling the report inaccurate and criticizing the anonymous sources.
Read More
A preliminary US intelligence assessment, produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency, indicates that the recent US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities likely only set back Iran’s nuclear program by a few months, rather than “obliterating” it as claimed by President Trump. The assessment, based on a battle damage assessment, suggests that key components such as enriched uranium and centrifuges remained largely intact. This assessment contrasts with the White House’s stance and Trump’s assertions of complete destruction, which have been disputed by the US military. Further assessments are ongoing, and both House and Senate briefings on the operation have been postponed or delayed.
Read More
Tehran will restore its nuclear program, Iranian atomic chief vows, and frankly, did anyone really think otherwise? It’s almost as if we’re stuck in a loop, aren’t we? They’ll be quiet for a bit, quietly rebuilding, gathering strength, and then, boom, we’re right back where we started. Groundhog Day, indeed. It’s a cycle that’s become all too familiar.
The big question, as always, is who’s going to foot the bill this time around? This isn’t a particularly new problem, and this is the third time we are having to address the same issue in the same manner. The world’s current state has shown that nuclear weapons are a deterrent.… Continue reading
Trump says both Israel and Iran violated ceasefire, and that Iran’s nuclear capabilities are gone, which immediately sparks a whole lot of questions, doesn’t it? It’s like the news cycle has been doing the equivalent of a record scratch, because if you’re keeping score, this isn’t the first, second, or even third time a ceasefire supposedly orchestrated by him has, shall we say, not panned out as advertised. The core of the matter seems to be this: a supposed agreement was trumpeted, yet almost immediately, both sides were accused of breaking it. And if that weren’t enough, we’re being told Iran’s nuclear ambitions are a thing of the past.… Continue reading
The recent airstrikes on Iran, despite their tactical impressiveness, may have fallen short of their strategic goals, particularly concerning the destruction of Iran’s nuclear program. Uncertainty surrounds the effectiveness of the attacks, with doubts arising on whether the bunker-busting bombs successfully destroyed Iran’s enriched uranium. Iran’s response, including missile strikes on a U.S. air base, has raised the stakes and increased the likelihood of further U.S. involvement. The ambiguous location of Iran’s uranium stockpile following the attack has intensified the uncertainty surrounding the conflict and its potential escalation.
Read More
Following the US air strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer called for restraint, warning of a risk of escalation beyond the region. The UK, while informed of the strikes, was not involved, and Starmer stated that all necessary measures were taken to protect British interests and personnel. The Prime Minister, alongside Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz, urged Iran not to take further destabilizing actions and called for negotiations regarding its nuclear program. In response to the strikes, British Airways cancelled flights to the United Arab Emirates and Qatar.
Read More
Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, Vice President JD Vance has expressed concerns that Tehran may have moved its near-bomb-grade uranium before the attacks. Israeli sources indicated that Iran had possibly relocated a significant amount of enriched uranium from a secure plant in Isfahan. Despite the President’s claims of complete destruction of nuclear sites, and the Press Secretary’s confidence in the success of the bombings, Vance’s statements suggest otherwise. The speculation around the bombings suggests that Trump’s social media threats may have tipped off the Iranians, giving them time to protect their uranium.
Read More
Following U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, Iran’s military issued a strongly worded warning to President Trump, labeling him a “gambler” and vowing retaliatory action with “heavy, regretful, and unpredictable consequences.” Tehran accused the U.S. of violating its sovereignty and acting as an accomplice to Israel, broadening the scope of potential Iranian targets. In response to the strikes, Iran launched ballistic missiles at Israel and threatened to close the Strait of Hormuz, escalating regional tensions and potentially destabilizing global markets. International efforts to de-escalate the situation are underway amid rising concerns of a wider conflict.
Read More
Foreign Minister Winston Peters stated that New Zealand’s condemnation of Iran’s actions did not automatically equate to support for the US airstrikes. He emphasized that such military action would only be justifiable if Iran possessed a significant nuclear weapons capability. This conditional support highlights a nuanced position on the conflict. The level of Iran’s nuclear preparedness, therefore, becomes the key determinant of New Zealand’s stance on the US response.
Read More
Following President Trump’s announcement of U.S. airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear sites, Vice President Vance clarified that the U.S. is not at war with Iran, but rather its nuclear program. While he expressed confidence in significantly delaying Iran’s nuclear capabilities, Vance avoided definitively stating the complete destruction of the sites. Conflicting reports emerged regarding the extent of the damage, with Iranian officials disputing the claims of total obliteration. The attacks prompted retaliatory strikes by Iran against Israel and raised concerns about potential escalation.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood