In a recent interview, President Donald Trump declared that Iran’s leadership has been “neutered” and expressed a desire for a new leader who will be favorable to the United States and Israel, regardless of whether the state is democratic. He drew a parallel to the situation in Venezuela, predicting a similarly successful leadership change in Iran. Trump also indicated that Cuba would “fall pretty soon,” and emphasized the critical importance of voter ID legislation, suggesting it would heavily influence his Texas Senate endorsement.
Read More
The assertion from Senate Republicans that the United States cannot “fix” Iran, particularly in the wake of significant geopolitical events, reflects a broader skepticism about America’s capacity to engineer regime change or impose its will on complex foreign nations. This perspective suggests that the onus of transformation rests not with external powers, but with the Iranian people themselves. The argument posits that any lasting change within Iran will likely emerge from internal forces, whether those involve elements within the existing regime seeking a new direction or an entirely new political structure arising from within the country. The United States, in this view, can at best create conditions that are conducive to such internal change, but cannot dictate the outcome.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood