This report on shopping trends is presented by an independent team and is separate from CTV News journalism. The team may receive commission from purchases made through affiliate links included within this content. Full transparency regarding the team’s operations can be found via a link to an “About Us” page.
President Trump speculated that China’s increased economic engagement with Vietnam is a strategy to undermine the United States, citing potential losses in trade deals under the Biden administration. He expressed no ill will towards either China or Vietnam, framing their cooperation as a calculated effort to disadvantage the US. Conversely, the Chinese embassy spokesperson emphasized the importance of regional cooperation and unity, asserting that such partnerships benefit all involved nations. This contrasts sharply with Trump’s accusation, highlighting differing perspectives on the Sino-Vietnamese economic relationship.
The yuan’s recent fall to its weakest point since 2007 is directly linked to the escalating US-China trade war. The imposition of substantial new US tariffs on Chinese goods, reaching as high as 104%, has significantly impacted the trade relationship. This has created a ripple effect, putting immense pressure on the Chinese currency.
The Chinese government is actively intervening to manage this decline. Their efforts involve directing banks to reduce their purchases of US dollars and instead sell them, attempting to control the speed of the yuan’s devaluation. This balancing act is crucial, as a weaker yuan offers advantages but also carries significant risks.… Continue reading
The recent shift in Trump’s tariff policies highlights the significant advantages of European unity, a point emphasized by the German chancellor-designate. This isn’t to say that the outcome was entirely a result of coordinated EU action; rather, the unified response from the EU members created a strong enough counterweight to pressure Trump into reconsidering his strategy.
The initial imposition of tariffs was met with a collective response from the EU, a marked difference from past instances where individual member states might have reacted independently, leaving them vulnerable to individual pressure. This time, however, the unified front presented a formidable obstacle to Trump’s unilateral actions.… Continue reading
In response to U.S. tariffs on steel and aluminum, the European Union approved retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, effective April 15th and May 15th. These countermeasures target a range of products including poultry, grains, clothing, and metals, aiming to protect European businesses and consumers from the economic harm caused by the U.S. actions. The EU emphasized its preference for a negotiated solution with the U.S., stating that the retaliatory tariffs could be suspended if a fair agreement is reached. This action comes after President Trump imposed tariffs on a wide range of EU imports.
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker solidified economic ties by signing a trade agreement with the United Kingdom, focusing on climate-conscious manufacturing and equitable economic opportunities. This follows a similar agreement with the State of Mexico, furthering Illinois’ global trade partnerships. The UK agreement aims to boost trade between the two entities, with Illinois exporting over $2.6 billion in goods to the UK in 2024. These initiatives counter the impact of recent U.S. tariffs on foreign imports.
US auto tariffs, implemented via complex tariff codes, unexpectedly impacted computer imports. Tariff code 8471, encompassing all computers and related hardware, resulted in a 25% customs duty on affected products, specifically those intended for automotive use. While the current surcharge is limited to 25%, the situation remains fluid, with potential for further increases due to separate semiconductor tariffs. This ambiguity highlights the complexity and potential for unintended consequences within the tariff structure.
Contrary to former President Trump’s assertions, a trade deficit does not represent an economic loss; it signifies that a nation imports more than it exports. Economists largely agree that trade deficits are not inherently negative, as a country cannot and should not produce all goods domestically. Trump’s focus on eliminating the U.S. trade deficit with China, particularly the $295.4 billion deficit in 2024, stemmed from a misunderstanding of basic economics and was driven by protectionist sentiments. His demands for China to resolve the surplus before tariff negotiations highlighted this flawed perspective.
Global stock markets experienced a sharp downturn Monday, fueled by President Trump’s tariffs. Frankfurt’s market saw the most dramatic decline, falling as much as 10 percent. Other major European indices, including Paris, London, Amsterdam, Oslo, and Milan, also suffered significant losses, ranging from 3 to over 6 percent. This widespread sell-off reflects intensifying global market volatility.
President Trump imposed a 34 percent tariff on Chinese goods, prompting China to retaliate with its own tariffs and import suspensions. Trump, on Truth Social, criticized China’s actions, blaming past U.S. leaders for allowing decades of unfair trade practices. This escalation has caused significant global market turmoil, with major stock indexes experiencing sharp declines and warnings of potential recession. Economists express concerns about the wider economic ramifications of this trade war, particularly for smaller, trade-dependent nations.
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood