Trump’s decision to pause all student visa vetting interviews is a move that has sparked widespread debate and concern. The immediate impact is a halt to the processing of student and exchange visitor visas (F, M, and J categories), effectively freezing the intake of international students at American universities.
This pause, ostensibly implemented to allow for the expansion of social media screening and vetting procedures, is perceived by many as a needless and overly burdensome bureaucratic hurdle. The concern isn’t just about the immediate halt; it’s about the chilling effect this action will have on prospective students worldwide. The uncertainty created by this abrupt pause will likely deter many from even applying to American universities, regardless of how long the pause lasts.… Continue reading
The US State Department has temporarily halted new student visa appointments globally to implement expanded social media vetting for all applicants. This action, stemming from a cable issued by Secretary Rubio, follows recent visa revocations and attempts to restrict foreign student enrollment. The pause is expected to create a significant backlog and potentially severely impact fall enrollment, particularly given the timing of the announcement. The expanded vetting process, while described as a review of existing procedures, raises concerns about its impact on international student admissions to US universities.
Read More
The White House has temporarily halted new student visa appointments at U.S. embassies to implement expanded social media screenings for applicants. This pause, affecting all student visa applicants, is due to the “significant implications” the expanded vetting will have on embassy operations. The State Department will issue further guidance in the coming days. This action is the latest in a series of administration policies restricting international students, some of which have faced legal challenges.
Read More
Harvard University filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration after the Department of Homeland Security revoked the university’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, effectively barring international students. This action, deemed unlawful and unwarranted by Harvard President Alan Garber, jeopardizes the futures of thousands of students and represents a significant escalation in the conflict between the university and the administration. The lawsuit alleges a retaliatory campaign against Harvard, highlighting the potential destabilization of the university’s operations by restricting international student enrollment. Harvard’s swift legal response underscores the critical role international students play in its academic community.
Read More
The Trump administration revoked Harvard University’s Student and Exchange Visitor Program certification, barring the enrollment of future international students and requiring current ones to transfer or face deportation. The Department of Homeland Security cited Harvard’s alleged failure to address claims of anti-American activity and violence on campus, despite Harvard’s denial of these accusations and assertion that the action is unlawful. This decision followed earlier threats and the freezing of federal grants, impacting over 27% of Harvard’s student body. A federal injunction, however, may prevent the immediate deportation of currently enrolled international students.
Read More
Priya Saxena, an Indian national studying in South Dakota, was granted a preliminary injunction preventing her deportation after her student visa was revoked due to a minor traffic infraction from four years prior. Despite this, Saxena successfully completed her master’s and doctorate degrees. The government’s action, part of a broader initiative targeting 1.3 million foreign-born students based on incomplete NCIC data, was deemed unlawful by the court. Saxena’s case highlights concerns regarding the accuracy and fairness of the government’s mass review of student records.
Read More
Following numerous court challenges, the U.S. government reversed the termination of legal status for over 1,200 international students nationwide. ICE is restoring student status in the SEVIS database for those whose records were recently terminated, though a new policy is being developed to address future SEVIS record terminations. While student status is being reinstated, the government maintains it has not reversed any visa revocations, leaving some uncertainty about the full scope of restoration efforts. Ongoing legal battles may still seek broader protections for affected students beyond the reactivation of their student records.
Read More
The Trump administration revoked over 1,500 student visas, citing national security concerns related to political activities like pro-Palestinian protests. Subsequently, many universities disenrolled affected students based on terminated SEVIS records. However, a Michigan court ruling and DHS court filings confirmed that SEVIS termination does not automatically revoke legal immigration status. This revelation exposes the universities’ actions as potentially unlawful, as the basis for disenrollment was faulty. Despite this, the DHS website still incorrectly implies that SEVIS termination ends legal status, leaving many students and institutions in uncertainty.
Read More
Across Pennsylvania, numerous universities, including Carnegie Mellon, Pitt, and Penn State, are reporting the unexplained revocation of international student visas. One affected CMU student, Jayson Ma, faces deportation despite his impending graduation and his mother’s terminal illness. Universities are offering support to affected students, but the reasons for the revocations remain unclear, with some speculation linking them to past legal issues, even if expunged. Students are advised to carry necessary documentation and prepare for potential deportation.
Read More
Visa records of CMU international students being terminated without notice is deeply concerning. The lack of transparency and due process involved raises serious questions about the fairness and legality of these actions. The sheer scale of the issue, potentially affecting thousands of students at various universities across the country, highlights a systemic problem impacting not only individual students but also the broader academic landscape.
The financial implications for both students and institutions are staggering. Students are investing significant sums of money – upwards of $68,000 annually for tuition and living expenses – only to have their educational journeys abruptly and unfairly cut short.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker