Former Senate counsels are adamant: thorough FBI vetting of any Trump Cabinet picks is absolutely essential. This isn’t merely a procedural formality; it’s a critical safeguard against potential risks to national security and the integrity of the government.
The consequences of neglecting this process are potentially severe. A lack of rigorous vetting could allow individuals with troubling backgrounds – histories of sexual assault, significant financial entanglements, or even connections to foreign adversaries – to gain access to sensitive information and positions of power.
The likelihood of such individuals being appointed is, unfortunately, quite real. The pool of people willing to serve in a Trump administration, and simultaneously pass a comprehensive background check, is likely quite small.… Continue reading
Russia’s ongoing campaign of sabotage across Europe is alarmingly reckless, a blatant disregard for international norms and stability. This brazen behavior, coupled with escalating nuclear threats, is intended to intimidate nations supporting Ukraine and undermine the international effort to counter Russian aggression. The scale of these actions is significant, affecting crucial infrastructure and national security, and highlights a pattern of escalating hostility.
The implications of Russia’s actions extend far beyond the immediate targets of sabotage. A successful subjugation of Ukraine would embolden Russia’s allies, like China and North Korea, and embolden further acts of aggression by adversaries such as Iran. Ignoring this threat would have devastatingly higher consequences than supporting Ukraine’s fight for its sovereignty.… Continue reading
Reports indicate that President-elect Trump’s transition team is drafting an executive order to medically discharge approximately 15,000 transgender service members. This action, if implemented, would create significant logistical challenges for the military, potentially disrupting readiness and exacerbating existing recruiting difficulties. The proposed mass discharge contrasts sharply with current policy and could face legal hurdles, mirroring previous attempts to ban transgender service members. Experts warn of the severe consequences of such a drastic and disruptive measure, particularly given the experience level and contributions of transgender service members.
Read More
President-elect Trump nominated John Phelan, a Republican megadonor and finance executive with no military experience, as the next Secretary of the Navy. Phelan’s fundraising efforts for the Trump campaign appear to be his primary qualification for the position. Criticism has arisen regarding Phelan’s lack of relevant experience, prompting concerns about the increasing politicization of cabinet appointments. This nomination follows other controversial selections, including a Defense Secretary pick facing sexual assault allegations.
Read More
A former National Intelligence Chairman has deemed Tulsi Gabbard unfit and dangerous for a position of power, particularly within the intelligence community. The concerns are deeply rooted in Gabbard’s perceived close ties to Russia and a history of promoting narratives aligning with Russian interests. This raises serious questions about her suitability for handling highly sensitive national security information.
The potential implications of placing someone with such alleged affiliations in a position of authority are alarming. Access to classified intelligence could be exploited, potentially compromising national security and furthering foreign agendas. The sheer risk involved demands a thorough examination of these allegations and a careful consideration of the potential consequences.… Continue reading
Former Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard, Donald Trump’s nominee for Director of National Intelligence, was briefly placed on a TSA watchlist due to an algorithm flagging her travel history and foreign connections. Although quickly removed after Gabbard publicized the matter, the incident raises questions about vetting processes for such sensitive positions, particularly given the unusual nature of a nominee being flagged for additional screening. While sources dispute her claims of political targeting, the episode highlights concerns about the interplay between foreign engagement, political rhetoric, and national security protocols. Gabbard’s past comments, including those related to Russia and Syria, further complicate her nomination.
Read More
Approximately 60 British troops, including counter-drone specialists, have been deployed to three US Air Force bases in the UK following a series of unusual drone sightings. These deployments aim to protect the bases and identify the drone operators, amid concerns of a coordinated operation. Civilian and Ministry of Defence police are investigating the incidents, which involved multiple drones observed over several nights. While the drones haven’t been deemed hostile, the US Air Force and RAF continue to monitor airspace and maintain a robust security posture.
Read More
Donald Trump’s recent appointments, including Tulsi Gabbard for Director of National Intelligence, Pete Hegseth for Secretary of Defense, and Matt Gaetz for Attorney General, represent a significant shift towards controversial figures. Gabbard, a former congresswoman with a history of promoting conspiracy theories and aligning with Russian propaganda, is particularly concerning given her new role overseeing intelligence agencies. Her past actions, including downplaying Assad’s chemical weapons attacks and spreading misinformation about US-funded biolabs in Ukraine, raise serious questions about her suitability for the position. This unconventional approach to staffing key national security positions reflects a clear preference by Trump for candidates who challenge established norms.
Read More
A top NATO official’s recent call for businesses to prepare for a “wartime scenario” has sparked a wave of discussion and anxiety. The warning is a stark reminder that the current geopolitical climate is fraught with tension, and that the consequences of escalating conflicts could significantly impact the global economy. This isn’t about predicting imminent war, but rather about acknowledging the possibility and urging preparedness.
The official’s message emphasizes the interconnectedness of commercial decisions and national security. Businesses, particularly those with significant international operations, need to understand that their supply chains and global reach are inherently vulnerable in times of conflict.… Continue reading
Tulsi Gabbard’s nomination as Director of National Intelligence is highly controversial due to her history of promoting Russian propaganda and supporting authoritarian regimes. Her past actions, including questioning the source of Syrian airstrikes that injured children and defending Assad’s regime, demonstrate a troubling lack of objectivity and empathy. Experts express concerns about her susceptibility to disinformation and her potential to undermine US intelligence credibility with allies. These concerns, coupled with questions about her meeting the required “extensive national security expertise” for the DNI position, raise serious doubts about her suitability for the role.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker