The Trump administration is set to withdraw from a number of international organizations, including the U.N.’s population agency and the U.N. treaty for climate negotiations. This move follows a review of U.S. participation and funding for international organizations, with many of the targeted entities focusing on climate, labor, and migration. The administration views these institutions as “redundant” and detrimental to U.S. interests. This decision continues a pattern of the U.S. exiting global agencies and shifting its approach to multilateralism, prioritizing cooperation on its own terms.
Read More
The Trump administration has announced its withdrawal from numerous international organizations, including the UN’s population agency and the UN climate treaty, reflecting a broader shift away from global cooperation. This decision, stemming from a review of US involvement in and funding for international bodies, targets agencies focused on climate, labor, and diversity initiatives, which the administration deems redundant or contrary to US interests. The US has previously suspended support for various UN agencies, adopting a selective approach to funding based on alignment with its agenda. This strategy marks a departure from past administrations and has prompted the UN to respond with staffing and program cuts, while also hindering global efforts to address the climate crisis.
Read More
Israel’s recent notification to the United Nations, asserting that the 1967 agreement recognizing the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) is void, reverberates deeply within the context of the ongoing Israel-Palestine conflict. Personally, I find this move emblematic of broader frustrations with an organization that, despite its lofty ideals, has drifted from its original purpose. The UN appears mired in a quagmire of bureaucratic malaise, undermined by its apparent inability to enforce its own resolutions.
What is most startling is that Israel’s position reflects a larger reality that many nations are beginning to recognize: an international institution tasked with upholding peace and securing human rights can no longer afford to be perceived as anything but impartial.… Continue reading
It is truly shocking to discover that an individual identified by Israel as the leader of Hamas in Lebanon was actually a United Nations employee who, according to UNWRA, had joined Hamas. This revelation sheds light on the complex web of connections between international organizations and terrorist groups, particularly in conflict zones like the Middle East.
The fact that Fateh Al Sharif, who was killed in an Israeli strike, was not only a UN employee but held influential roles within the organization is deeply troubling. To think that someone entrusted with educating and supporting refugees could also be involved in activities that directly harm civilians and perpetuate violence is concerning, to say the least.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood