The United Nations Security Council convened an emergency meeting following the US’s actions in Venezuela, which were widely condemned as a “crime of aggression.” Multiple countries, including Brazil, China, and Russia, denounced the US’s military strikes and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro, viewing it as a violation of Venezuela’s sovereignty and a dangerous precedent. While the US defended its actions as a law enforcement operation, experts questioned the legality, citing a lack of UN authorization and Venezuelan consent. Despite the widespread condemnation, the Security Council remained divided, and a collective response was unlikely due to the US’s veto power.
Read More
UN Says US Raid on Venezuela Violated International Law – The pronouncements of the United Nations, particularly when they declare a violation of international law, often carry a weight that’s quickly assessed in terms of real-world impact. In this instance, the UN has stated that a US raid on Venezuela violated international law. It’s a statement that, while significant on paper, immediately prompts the question: what comes next? The harsh reality is that international law’s effectiveness hinges on enforcement. If a powerful nation, like the US, doesn’t recognize or adhere to the ruling, the UN’s influence is significantly curtailed. It’s a bit like a judge handing down a sentence without the authority to make sure it’s carried out.… Continue reading
Former Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro entered a New York federal court on Monday and pleaded not guilty to charges of narco-terrorism and drug trafficking. The charges include conspiracy, cocaine importation, and weapons offenses, alleging that Maduro worked with drug cartels. If convicted, he could face life in prison. Maduro’s legal team is expected to challenge the legality of his arrest, arguing immunity. This dramatic U.S. intervention, which the U.S. defends as a law enforcement action, has triggered global condemnation, an emergency U.N. Security Council meeting, and diverse responses from the Venezuelan government and international actors, with implications for the country’s oil reserves and political future.
Read More
The United States, under President Trump, has illegally overthrown the Venezuelan government, violating international law and the U.S. Constitution by kidnapping President Maduro and bringing him to the U.S. on criminal charges. This act sets a dangerous precedent, asserting the U.S.’s right to launch coups against any government it deems to have violated U.S. law, effectively undermining national sovereignty. Despite transparent motives regarding Venezuela’s oil reserves, many U.S. officials and media outlets have offered support or muted criticism of the coup, while other countries have condemned it. The author emphasizes the need for a strong condemnation of Trump’s actions, and highlights the risk of further aggression towards other nations.
Read More
Despite campaigning on an “America First” platform that rejected foreign intervention, Donald Trump has announced the United States will run Venezuela indefinitely. This decision marks a complete reversal of his prior stance against global policing, with the US potentially deploying troops and allowing American oil companies to profit from Venezuelan resources. Trump provided little detail about the operation’s legality or the long-term plan, aside from stating that American courts would be the proper forum for accountability. This abrupt shift in policy has alarmed global leaders, as it undermines international law and signals unpredictable US foreign policy, potentially leading to significant backlash and consequences for the US.
Read More
The EU has emphasized the importance of a peaceful transition in Venezuela, reiterating that Nicolás Maduro lacks legitimacy and calling for restraint. Following reports of Maduro’s alleged arrest by U.S. personnel on criminal charges, EU officials, including Kallas, have conferred with counterparts like U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Statements from U.S. officials alluded to charges against Maduro and his wife, while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy reacted with a provocative comment and European Parliament President Roberta Metsola applauded the removal.
Read More
Following alleged U.S. air strikes in Venezuela, Colombian President Gustavo Petro has called for emergency meetings with the UN and OAS. Petro condemned the unilateral military action, emphasizing Colombia’s commitment to respecting sovereignty and peaceful conflict resolution. The Colombian government aims to preserve regional peace and de-escalate the situation, prioritizing dialogue while addressing potential humanitarian and migration needs on the border. These actions come after Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro called for solidarity against what he deemed “imperial aggression,” following reported U.S. air strikes related to alleged drug trafficking.
Read More
France Condemns US Operation To Capture Maduro: France has vocally condemned the US operation that led to the capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, a stance that has ignited a complex debate on international law, sovereignty, and the true motivations behind the US action. The French government, echoing the sentiment of many nations, has emphasized that while Maduro’s regime may have committed human rights violations, the manner of his removal by the US constitutes a violation of international norms. Specifically, the operation is seen as contradicting the principle of non-use of force, a cornerstone of international law that underpins global stability.… Continue reading
The reported capture of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by US forces has sparked global concern, as it is seen as an illegal and destabilizing act that undermines international norms and potentially creates chaos. This aggressive assertion of US power, mirroring threats against Iran, is driven by Trump’s personal animosity and a desire to revive the Monroe Doctrine. Regional leaders and authoritarian regimes alike are alarmed, fearing they could be next, while Trump’s actions are setting dangerous precedents for other global powers. This reckless behavior and disregard for the consequences could lead to civil war, further escalate existing conflicts, and solidify Trump’s image as a global warmaker rather than a peacemaker.
Read More
The recent US military action in Venezuela, including the alleged abduction of the president, has triggered widespread condemnation from Latin American and global leaders. Many view the assault as a continuation of US interventionism in the region, with some leaders labeling it an act of state terrorism and a violation of Venezuelan sovereignty. While some leaders have called for de-escalation, others, such as the presidents of Chile, Mexico, and others are calling for respect for international law. The events have also led to concerns about regional stability and the potential for a refugee crisis.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood