Military struck drug boat in Caribbean 4 times in Sept. 2 attack, says US official: Let’s break this down. The news that the military targeted a boat in the Caribbean and hit it not once, but four times, immediately raises a lot of questions. It’s the kind of headline that grabs your attention and makes you want to dig deeper. The initial reaction is a mix of shock and disbelief. Did they really need to hit it four times? What was on the boat? And why so many strikes?
The use of four strikes suggests more than just an attempt to disable a vessel.… Continue reading
Top Russian banker says the EU faces 50 years of litigation if it takes Russia’s frozen assets, huh? Well, isn’t that precious? This whole situation has a distinct air of “pot calling the kettle black.” Russia, a country that seems to have a tenuous grasp on the concept of international law, is now threatening legal action? It’s like a toddler throwing a tantrum because you took away their toy – a toy, by the way, that they stole from someone else. The sheer audacity is almost impressive.
It’s truly mind-boggling how Russia can even attempt to frame this as an issue of legality when they’ve blatantly disregarded international law, committed war crimes, and invaded a sovereign nation.… Continue reading
Lawmakers warn Hegseth may have committed war crimes following second-strike report, and honestly, the implications are chilling. The core of the issue seems to revolve around the allegation that Hegseth, and by extension, possibly others in the chain of command, authorized actions that constitute war crimes. The gravity of such accusations cannot be overstated, especially when the reports suggest potential violations of international law, specifically the Geneva Conventions. It’s not just about a single event; the narrative emerging paints a picture of systemic issues and potentially reckless disregard for the rules of engagement.
The crux of the matter appears to be the targeting of individuals and locations, particularly when the details suggest a disproportionate response.… Continue reading
In response to the US government’s increased pressure, including Donald Trump’s declaration that Venezuelan airspace is closed, the Venezuelan government issued a statement condemning the move as a “colonialist threat” and a violation of international law. The government demanded respect for its sovereignty and suspended all migrant deportation flights in response to Trump’s announcement. Trump’s actions follow a series of escalations, including US strikes against alleged drug boats, a military buildup in the region, and authorized covert CIA operations, as well as accusations against Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of involvement in drug trafficking, which he denies. The US Federal Aviation Administration also warned major airlines of a hazardous situation, leading Venezuela to revoke operating rights for several international airlines that had suspended flights.
Read More
Reports indicate that U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth may face a war crimes prosecution for allegedly ordering a second strike on a boat in the Caribbean to kill survivors of a U.S. missile attack. According to sources, Hegseth issued an order to kill everyone on board the boat, which was suspected of carrying drug smugglers. Following the initial strike, a second missile attack was reportedly ordered to eliminate any survivors, a decision that could constitute a war crime. While the Pentagon denies the allegations, the incident is under scrutiny as it potentially violates the laws of armed conflict by killing individuals unable to fight.
Read More
The US is facing scrutiny from G7 foreign ministers regarding recent military strikes in the Caribbean, targeting vessels suspected of carrying drugs. French Foreign Minister Jean-Noël Barrot criticized the operations, citing potential instability in the region where France has overseas territories and concerns of unlawfulness, marking a rare rebuke of US actions. These strikes, which have resulted in at least 75 reported deaths, have led to questions about legal justification, with the US arguing self-defense while international experts raise concerns of war crimes. The G7 meeting, chaired by Canada, also focused on support for Ukraine and addressed the conflict in Sudan, but the Caribbean strikes were a central talking point.
Read More
French foreign minister says US military operations in Caribbean violate international law, and this has stirred up quite a debate. It’s a bold statement, and it’s certainly not something we hear every day, especially from a major ally. It makes you think about the complexities of international law, the exercise of power, and, of course, the ever-shifting landscape of global politics. The core of the issue seems to be the methods the US is using, with some describing them as extrajudicial executions, carried out without trials, and seemingly outside the bounds of established legal frameworks.
This brings up a fundamental question: When is a country’s right to act in its own defense, or in the name of fighting illegal activities like drug trafficking, justified?… Continue reading
The UK has reportedly ceased sharing some intelligence with the US regarding suspected drug trafficking vessels in the Caribbean due to concerns over American strikes against these boats. The US has conducted numerous strikes, resulting in a significant number of fatalities, which have raised questions about potential breaches of international law. The UK, which possesses intelligence assets in the Caribbean and previously assisted the US in identifying vessels, is withholding information to avoid being complicit in actions that may be illegal. This move follows the UN human rights chief’s assessment that the strikes constitute extrajudicial killings, adding further scrutiny to the situation.
Read More
Following the direction of President Trump, US forces conducted lethal strikes on two vessels off the coast of South America, resulting in the deaths of six individuals allegedly involved in drug trafficking. The strikes, which began in early September, have targeted vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, resulting in over 70 deaths to date. These actions have drawn criticism, with the UN human rights chief condemning them as a violation of international law, and Venezuela denouncing them as illegal and aggressive. Despite the attacks, the US has not made public any concrete evidence of the targets’ activities.
Read More
Exclusive: US intel found Israeli military lawyers warned there was evidence of Gaza war crimes, former US officials say, is a headline that sets the stage for a story many might have suspected, yet few could definitively confirm. The core takeaway, according to former US officials, is that American intelligence intercepted information suggesting internal Israeli military legal counsel had serious reservations. They were apparently concerned that some of Israel’s military actions in Gaza could potentially be construed as war crimes. This revelation, described as startling by those who were privy to it, paints a picture of doubt and internal conflict within the Israeli military apparatus itself.… Continue reading
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker