The Supreme Court Justices on Wednesday, expressed considerable skepticism regarding the legality of the aggressive tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. Justices questioned the administration’s justification for enacting the tariffs, with both conservative and liberal justices scrutinizing the process. The core of the legal challenge centers on whether the tariffs, levied under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, overstepped the President’s authority and infringed on Congress’s power to tax, as lower courts have ruled. If allowed to stand, the tariffs could generate trillions in revenue, highlighting the potential fiscal impact.
Read More
A recent report revealed that Trump’s election integrity official suggested invoking a “national emergency” to justify a federal takeover of state-run election processes for the 2026 election. This proposal comes amidst concerns from voting rights advocates, particularly given the elevation of election deniers within the administration. These individuals, who have pushed false claims of voter fraud, are reportedly aiming to influence election rules and potentially exert more control over the electoral process. The goal is to undermine the independence of state-run elections and potentially shift election outcomes.
Read More
Former President Trump has threatened to declare a national emergency in Washington, D.C., due to Mayor Muriel Bowser’s decision to end cooperation between the Metropolitan Police Department and ICE. Trump, in a Truth Social post, claimed his actions had dramatically reduced crime in the city and criticized Bowser for bowing to pressure from the “Radical Left Democrats.” He stated that he would call a national emergency and federalize the city if necessary to prevent crime from “roaring back.” Bowser has stated that immigration enforcement is not within the MPD’s purview, and she created an Emergency Operations Center to address the issues Trump highlighted.
Read More
A federal appeals court ruled that most of President Trump’s global tariffs were illegal, significantly impacting his trade policies. The court determined that the law Trump invoked to impose the tariffs, including his “reciprocal” tariffs, did not grant him the necessary power. The ruling pauses its effect until October 14th, giving the Trump administration time to appeal to the Supreme Court. The case originated from lawsuits challenging Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, and the court found that the tariffs’ scope exceeded the president’s authority.
Read More
Following a federal court ruling partially invalidating President Trump’s tariffs, former Vice President Pence reiterated his stance that the president lacks the constitutional authority to unilaterally impose tariffs. Pence cited Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution, which grants Congress the power to levy taxes and duties. A federal court agreed, stating that the president’s invocation of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to justify tariffs exceeded his authority. The administration has appealed the decision, keeping the tariffs temporarily in effect pending the appeal’s outcome.
Read More
A federal appeals court temporarily stayed a lower court ruling that invalidated most of President Trump’s tariffs, granting the administration’s request for a pause. This stay allows the administration time to argue against the lower court’s decision, which found the president lacked the authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose the tariffs. Plaintiffs, including state attorneys general and businesses, have a week to respond before the appeals court makes a final decision. The White House strongly criticized the lower court’s ruling, while plaintiffs expressed confidence in a reversal.
Read More
California is suing the Trump administration, arguing the President’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs on Mexico, Canada, and China is illegal. The lawsuit claims these tariffs, justified by the administration as boosting manufacturing and stemming fentanyl flow, are unlawfully implemented without congressional approval. California contends the tariffs inflict billions of dollars in economic damage on the state, citing inflated costs and jeopardized jobs. The state seeks an immediate court order halting the tariffs, highlighting significant trade relationships with Canada and Mexico as particularly affected.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker