International Condemnation

Russia’s “Ceasefire” Lie: 70 Missiles, 2,200 Drones Attack Ukraine

In the month following Ukraine’s unconditional acceptance of a US-proposed ceasefire on March 11th, Russia launched a relentless assault, firing nearly 70 missiles, over 2,200 Shahed drones, and more than 6,000 guided aerial bombs. This escalation, rejecting peace proposals, underscores Russia’s continued commitment to war and its disregard for civilian lives. International condemnation, including from French President Macron and former US President Trump, followed the attacks, highlighting Russia’s obstruction of peace efforts. The Ukrainian government urges increased international pressure on Russia to compel a genuine commitment to peace.

Read More

Israel’s Gaza Ground Invasion: Limited War, Unlimited Condemnation

Israel launched a limited ground operation in Gaza, re-occupying the Netzarim corridor and escalating the conflict following a January ceasefire. This action coincided with a deadly UN guesthouse strike that killed a Bulgarian worker and injured several others, including a British citizen; Israel denies responsibility. The ongoing offensive has resulted in over 436 Palestinian deaths, a figure disputed by Israel. International condemnation of the renewed Israeli assault is mounting, with concerns raised about the lack of a clear strategy and potential for further escalation.

Read More

Macron Condemns Trump’s Gaza “Real Estate” Plan as Ethnic Cleansing

French President Emmanuel Macron strongly criticized Donald Trump’s proposal to relocate Gazans, calling it a “real estate operation” rather than a political solution and emphasizing the importance of respecting Palestinians’ right to remain in their homeland. Macron’s rejection follows similar condemnations from the international community, including the UN, which warned against ethnic cleansing. While supporting Israel’s right to self-defense, France has publicly condemned Israeli policies in Gaza and suspended arms exports to the IDF. The Trump plan, also supported by Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu, has drawn widespread international criticism, with only a few far-right voices expressing support.

Read More

Trump’s Gaza Plan: Ethnic Cleansing and Personal Profit?

President Trump’s plan to “take over” Gaza involves no right of return for Palestinians, who he suggests should be resettled in new communities in Egypt and Jordan, despite both countries’ rejection of this proposal. He envisions Gaza as a real estate development project, a plan met with outrage and condemnation internationally, including accusations of ethnic cleansing by UN investigators. This initiative, welcomed by Israel’s far-right, lacks any serious logistical or legal planning within the US government.

Read More

Israeli Minister Suggests Relocating Gaza Residents to Europe, Sparking Outrage

Following President Trump’s proposal to resettle Gazans and transform Gaza into the “Riviera of the Middle East,” Israeli Defence Minister Katz suggested that countries critical of Israel’s actions in Gaza, including Ireland, should accept these refugees. This plan, involving land, sea, and air departures, has drawn immediate international condemnation, with Russia, China, Germany, and Saudi Arabia among those rejecting the proposal. Ireland’s Tánaiste Simon Harris’s spokesperson countered that focusing on resettlement is a distraction from the immediate priorities of a sustainable ceasefire, hostage release, humanitarian aid, and a two-state solution. While some US officials clarified the resettlement as temporary, inconsistencies remain regarding the plan’s permanence and the potential deployment of US troops.

Read More

Trump’s Gaza ‘Riviera’ Plan Sparks International Outrage

Trump’s audacious proposal to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” has sparked a firestorm of international condemnation, leaving many questioning his motives and the potential consequences of such a plan. The sheer audacity of the idea, suggesting a lavish resort development in a region ravaged by conflict and poverty, is striking. It seems to completely disregard the existing realities on the ground, the deep-seated grievances of the Palestinian population, and the fragile geopolitical balance in the region.

The timing of the announcement itself is suspect, raising questions about whether this is a genuine policy proposal or a deliberate distraction tactic.… Continue reading