Trump says the US has “just about” ended the pause on intelligence sharing with Ukraine. This announcement follows a period where the flow of crucial information was halted, a decision now being framed as a temporary measure. The “just about” phrasing itself is intriguing, hinting at a less-than-complete reversal and suggesting the process isn’t fully back to its pre-pause state. It leaves room for questions about the extent of the reinstated intelligence sharing and the timeline for a full restoration.
This seemingly abrupt change in policy raises questions about the initial reasons for the pause. It seems the decision wasn’t based on any strategic assessment but rather on a knee-jerk reaction driven by emotions, potentially stemming from personal grievances or short-sighted political calculations.… Continue reading
The US recently halted intelligence sharing with Ukraine, impacting its ability to conduct deep strikes and defend against incoming missiles. While the UK and France will continue providing intelligence, their capabilities are more limited and cannot fully replace the US contribution. This intelligence freeze raises concerns about Ukraine’s ability to detect and counter Russian offensives, potentially jeopardizing civilian safety. However, Ukraine maintains its own intelligence gathering and the impact on front-line operations remains debated. The US decision, described by some as a political maneuver to pressure Ukraine into negotiations, has led to a significant shift in the conflict’s dynamics.
Read More
Concerns are rising among U.S. allies, including members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, regarding the Trump administration’s warming relationship with Russia. These allies are considering scaling back intelligence sharing due to fears of jeopardizing the safety and identities of foreign assets. This review encompasses broader concerns about the reliability of the U.S. as an ally across various aspects of cooperation, including diplomacy and military matters. While some allies publicly deny any intention to reduce cooperation, the potential impact on decades-long intelligence partnerships is substantial and raises serious national security implications. The situation is further complicated by the administration’s recent actions regarding cybersecurity and Ukraine.
Read More
Growing ties between the U.S. and Russia are prompting concern among key American allies, including members of the Five Eyes intelligence alliance and nations like Israel and Saudi Arabia. These allies fear that increased cooperation with Russia could inadvertently expose the identities of their intelligence sources. Consequently, discussions are underway regarding potential adjustments to intelligence-sharing protocols to mitigate this risk. This broader reassessment of U.S. relationships encompasses diplomatic, trade, military, and intelligence collaborations.
Read More
Concerns are rising among U.S. allies regarding the Trump administration’s warming relationship with Russia, prompting discussions about scaling back intelligence sharing. This potential reduction stems from fears of jeopardizing the safety and identities of foreign assets, a sacrosanct commitment for intelligence agencies. While no decisions have been made, allies, including members of the Five Eyes alliance, are reviewing intelligence-sharing protocols to account for this shift. Publicly, allies downplayed the issue, but underlying anxieties remain regarding the administration’s approach to Russia and the potential for reduced cooperation on cybersecurity. This review is part of a broader reassessment of the entire spectrum of relations with Washington.
Read More
The United States abruptly halted a crucial intelligence feed to Ukraine at 2 PM Kyiv time, including real-time targeting data for HIMARS systems and long-range strike information. This action, reportedly linked to a Trump administration decision to suspend military aid, effectively froze key intelligence channels between Washington and Kyiv. The UK was also barred from sharing US intelligence with Ukraine. Sources expressed outrage, connecting the intelligence cutoff to a perceived lack of gratitude from the Ukrainian government.
Read More
The United States has halted military aid and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, significantly impacting its defense capabilities. This decision, following a dispute between Presidents Trump and Zelensky, prevents the UK from sharing US-derived intelligence with Ukraine, affecting key agencies like GCHQ. Ukrainian officials warn of a critical shortage of weapons within two to three months, potentially leading to territorial losses. The move has drawn criticism from European allies, who fear it will embolden Russia and prolong the conflict.
Read More
Amidst growing concerns over the U.S.’s shifting foreign policy, particularly regarding Ukraine, Canada’s Foreign Affairs Minister Mélanie Joly is advocating for increased intelligence sharing with European partners. This shift is driven by concerns about the politicization of U.S. intelligence under the Trump administration, including controversial appointments and potential threats to intelligence-sharing agreements. Experts warn of a need for Canada to bolster its independent intelligence capabilities and forge new alliances to mitigate its reliance on the U.S. This includes proactively engaging with countries outside traditional alliances and deploying intelligence personnel internationally.
Read More
Former U.S. Attorney Barbara McQuade warns that if Donald Trump’s classified documents case is dropped and he returns to the presidency, key American allies may cease sharing sensitive intelligence. This stems from concerns that Trump’s past handling of classified information, much of it originating from foreign governments, demonstrates a lack of trustworthiness. The potential loss of this crucial intelligence sharing would severely compromise national security. Co-hosts of the #SistersInLaw podcast concur, emphasizing the international ramifications of a potential Trump second term and the impact on foreign intelligence cooperation.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker