Internet Explorer 11 is no longer supported on the website. Users attempting to access the site via IE11 will experience a degraded or non-functional experience. To ensure the best possible user experience, visitors are strongly encouraged to use a different, modern web browser. This will allow for optimal performance and access to all features available on the site.
Nintendo has reportedly begun lobbying the Japanese government to address concerns surrounding generative AI and its impact on creators’ rights, as revealed by a member of Japan’s House of Representatives. This action aligns with the company’s history of rigorously protecting its intellectual property, especially in light of growing legal battles involving AI’s unauthorized use of copyrighted content. Furthermore, the Japanese government has started considering measures, with companies like Nintendo opting to avoid generative AI to safeguard their assets. The outcome of Nintendo’s lobbying efforts will hinge on how the government balances AI innovation with the protection of rights holders.
Disney and NBCUniversal filed a lawsuit against Midjourney, alleging copyright infringement by its AI image generator. The suit claims Midjourney’s service creates unauthorized copies of copyrighted characters like Darth Vader and Minions, functioning as a “virtual vending machine” for pirated images. The studios seek unspecified damages, an accounting of profits, and an injunction to stop the infringement, arguing that Midjourney’s actions constitute blatant copyright infringement and that readily available technological solutions could prevent this. This is a significant legal challenge to an AI company’s practices, highlighting the ongoing debate about the use of copyrighted material in AI training and image generation.
McDonald’s has applied to Russia’s Federal Service for Intellectual Property to register its trademark, a move mirroring Coca-Cola’s similar action in 2024. The application, filed in December 2024 and now accepted, covers fast food, beverages, restaurant services, and delivery. This action is reportedly to safeguard the company’s intellectual property rights within the Russian market.
As news broke that Beyoncé was issuing a cease-and-desist over the Trump campaign’s unauthorized use of her song, ‘Freedom,’ my first instinct was one of admiration for her swift and assertive action. In a world where artists often struggle to protect their intellectual property, it is refreshing to see someone of her caliber taking a stand against such blatant misuse.
The issue of artists having their work misappropriated for political gain is not a new phenomenon. However, the audacity of the Trump campaign to use Beyoncé’s music without permission is particularly egregious. It speaks to a larger issue of disrespect for individual rights and the assumption that powerful figures can simply disregard the wishes of those they seek to exploit.… Continue reading
Taylor Swift can absolutely sue Trump over the fake endorsement images he reposted. It’s a clear misuse of her likeness and intellectual property rights, especially with the enactment of the ELVIS Act in her home state of Tennessee, protecting artists from AI-generated content. The law is on her side, and she has the financial resources to outgun Trump in any legal battle. It’s not about winning the lawsuit; it’s about holding him accountable for his deceitful actions.
She should go for it, even if the chances of collecting any monetary damages from Trump are slim. The real victory would be in proving that he’s a lying hypocrite, and every Swiftie already knows that.… Continue reading
As someone who has seen the rise and fall of various trends and controversies, the recent news of Prime being sued in a trademark case by the US Olympic Committee caught my attention. The use of trademarked phrases like “OLYMPIC,” “OLYMPIAN,” “TEAM USA,” and “GOING FOR GOLD” on Prime Hydration’s product packaging and online advertisements has sparked a legal battle that may have broader implications than one might initially think.
The Olympic committee’s action against Prime brings into focus the delicate balance between protecting intellectual property rights and stifling creative expression. While it is essential to safeguard trademarks to prevent unauthorized use and maintain the integrity of iconic brands like the Olympics, one must also consider the implications of such legal battles on innovation and competition in the marketplace.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker