India says it will never restore the Indus Waters Treaty with Pakistan. This declaration signifies a significant shift in the long-standing agreement, one that has profound implications for both nations. The treaty, crucial to Pakistan’s agricultural sector and thus its very existence, is now jeopardized. Its termination would leave Pakistan acutely vulnerable, dependent on India’s goodwill for the water flow crucial to feeding its vast population.
India’s decision stems from a long history of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. The argument is that providing a lifeline to a country that actively fosters and supports groups dedicated to India’s destruction is simply untenable.… Continue reading
Following a recent escalation of tensions, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General warned India against weaponizing water, emphasizing that such an action would have devastating and long-lasting consequences for millions. This warning comes after India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and cross-border strikes, which Pakistan claims to have responded to proportionally, resulting in the loss of six Indian aircraft. Despite a US-brokered ceasefire, the ISPR director general highlighted the continued threat of conflict unless the Kashmir issue is addressed, asserting that Pakistan prioritizes peace but will defend its sovereignty. He also accused India of rejecting a neutral investigation into recent events and of supporting terrorism within Pakistan.
Read More
Following the Pahalgam terror attack and India’s subsequent suspension of the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan formally requested that India reconsider its decision. Pakistan’s letter to India’s Jal Shakti Ministry deemed the suspension “unilateral and illegal,” highlighting the treaty’s importance to Pakistan’s population and economy. However, India, citing the principle that “blood and water cannot flow together,” remained unmoved, asserting that Pakistan’s support for terrorism violated the treaty’s foundational principles of goodwill. The resulting irregular water flow is currently impacting Pakistani farmers.
Read More
Following a recent terrorist attack, India suspended the 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, prompting Pakistan to seek World Bank intervention. World Bank President Ajay Banga clarified the institution’s role is solely that of a facilitator in this bilateral dispute, rejecting speculation of direct intervention. India maintains that Pakistan has repeatedly violated the treaty, necessitating the suspension. The treaty, signed in 1960, governs the distribution of Indus River waters between the two nations.
Read More
Prime Minister Modi announced that India will prioritize its own water usage, effectively curbing water flow to Pakistan. This decision follows India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, a 1960 agreement allocating river water between the two nations, in response to a recent terror attack. Modi’s statement reflects a broader policy shift prioritizing national interests over international concerns, a change he credits with significant economic reforms, including strengthening the banking sector. This new focus, he argues, has led to India’s progress over the last decade.
Read More
India’s reduction of the Chenab River’s flow by 90 percent, due to maintenance at the Baglihar dam and planned work at the Kishanganga dam, has heightened tensions with Pakistan. This action follows India’s suspension of the Indus Water Treaty and other retaliatory measures in response to recent attacks and border clashes. Pakistan views any water diversion as an act of war, issuing strong warnings and conducting missile tests. The situation reflects the long-standing conflict over Kashmir and threatens further escalation.
Read More
Following a deadly terror attack in Pahalgam, Pakistan initiated cross-border firing along both the Line of Control and, exceptionally, the International Border in Jammu and Kashmir’s Pargawal sector. This escalation, marking the sixth consecutive day of ceasefire violations, comes amid plummeting India-Pakistan relations. India has retaliated to the attacks, and the situation is further complicated by India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty and other bilateral agreements. The UN Secretary-General has condemned the attack and urged both nations to avoid further escalation.
Read More
Following India’s countermeasures against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack, including the suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, Pakistan Minister Hanif Abbasi issued a nuclear threat. Abbasi warned of full-scale war should India halt Pakistan’s water supply, emphasizing the country’s hidden nuclear arsenal’s readiness for retaliation. He also mocked India’s economic sanctions, highlighting the disruption caused by Pakistan’s airspace closure. These statements follow similar provocative claims by Pakistan’s Defence Minister, Khawaja Asif, who admitted to past support of terror groups while accusing India of staging the attack.
Read More
Following a deadly attack on tourists in Kashmir, which killed 26, India and Pakistan engaged in a second day of cross-border gunfire along the heavily militarized ceasefire line. India accused Pakistani soldiers of initiating the unprovoked fire, while Pakistan offered to cooperate in a neutral investigation. The escalating tensions led to reciprocal expulsions of diplomats, visa cancellations, and the suspension of key agreements, including the Indus Waters Treaty, with both sides issuing strong warnings against further escalation. While India’s suspension of the water treaty is largely symbolic, the situation remains volatile and poses a significant risk to regional stability.
Read More
Following India’s suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty in response to a terrorist attack, PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari issued a strong warning to India, asserting Pakistan’s claim to the Indus River’s waters. He accused India of using the attack to mask internal security failures. This escalation follows India’s broader diplomatic and economic actions against Pakistan. The 1960 Indus Waters Treaty, a landmark agreement for water sharing, has no provision for unilateral withdrawal, raising serious concerns about the implications of India’s actions.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker