President Trump announced plans to initiate land strikes in Venezuela “very soon,” expanding the ongoing military operations that currently include attacks on boats suspected of drug trafficking in international waters. This expansion of military action comes after weeks of attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and Eastern Pacific, and amid a U.S. military buildup near Venezuela, including the deployment of significant naval and troop presence. While escalating military pressure, Trump also signaled openness to potential diplomatic engagement with Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro. This decision follows the designation of the Cartel de los Soles as a foreign terrorist organization.
Read More
As the U.S. builds up its largest military presence in Latin America in decades, recent polling indicates significant public opposition to military action in Venezuela. The CBS/YouGov poll revealed that 70% of Americans oppose U.S. military strikes in Venezuela, with 76% believing the administration has not clearly explained its position. Despite these concerns, the administration has been escalating its campaign, with the possibility of implementing strikes, potentially aiming for regime change. Furthermore, the poll found that three-quarters of Americans believe that congressional approval is needed for such actions.
Read More
House Democrats Press for Vote to Bar Military Action in Venezuela is a pressing issue that has captured the attention of many, and for good reason. The proposal, introduced by a group of House Democrats, seeks to restrain President Trump’s military campaign against alleged drug cartels in Venezuela, demanding explicit Congressional approval before any further military escalation. This move highlights a fundamental tenet of American governance: the crucial role of Congress in overseeing the power to declare war, a principle often referred to as the War Powers.
The measure itself is facing an uphill battle, especially in a Republican-controlled House, where procedural maneuvers could easily obstruct its progress.… Continue reading
Amid escalating tensions in the Caribbean, a Democratic Party critic warned that the release of newly surfaced documents detailing the president’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein could lead to military action in Venezuela as a distraction. The released emails included Epstein’s claims of spending time with the president and possessing sensitive information. This development followed the president’s threats against Venezuela and military strikes in the Caribbean. Furthermore, the administration has claimed the strikes are to stop drug trafficking out of Venezuela, while also signaling that the US could attack Venezuela directly, prompting Maduro to prepare the country’s military.
Read More
NATO allies are reportedly considering a tougher stance against Russia, discussing measures such as easing restrictions on pilots to allow them to shoot down Russian aircraft and deploying armed drones. These discussions, initiated by frontline NATO members and supported by France and Britain, come amid escalating tensions due to alleged airspace violations, drone activity, and sabotage plots. Concerns over the cost of intercepting drones and a perceived need for stronger deterrence are driving the discussions. Russia has warned that shooting down its aircraft would escalate the situation, while the EU is also preparing its own responses to the ongoing provocations.
Read More
President Trump announced the U.S. military again targeted a boat from Venezuela allegedly carrying drugs, resulting in the death of three individuals, and hinted at expanding military targeting of cartels. The administration justified the actions, citing the threat to U.S. security, while also suggesting potential strikes against cartels operating on land. This follows a previous military strike with deadly results, which raised questions of legality from various senators and human rights organizations. Meanwhile, Venezuelan President Maduro accused the U.S. of using drug trafficking accusations as a pretext for actions aimed at regime change.
Read More
Venezuela says the U.S. intercepted and boarded a Venezuelan tuna vessel in a “hostile” manner, and it’s got a lot of folks talking. It seems a U.S. destroyer, according to Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, intercepted, boarded, and essentially occupied a Venezuelan fishing vessel within Venezuela’s Special Economic Zone. Now, the Venezuelans are calling the whole thing illegal and hostile, adding that the crew consisted of “humble” fishermen and that the vessel posed no threat.
The immediate reaction here is a mix of skepticism and concern. A lot of the discussion immediately goes to the question of legality. Did the U.S. have any right to be doing this in Venezuelan waters?… Continue reading
President Trump will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. will take military action against Iran, a decision influenced by the possibility of upcoming negotiations. This announcement follows escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, including Iranian missile strikes on Israeli civilian targets, resulting in casualties and widespread damage. Israel has retaliated with intensified strikes on Iranian facilities, while Iran denies targeting civilians. International concern is rising, with some nations urging restraint and a return to diplomacy.
Read More
President Trump is reportedly considering military action against Iran, having privately approved attack plans but delaying a final order to see if Tehran abandons its nuclear program. This decision follows pressure from Israeli officials and Republican hawks, and the U.S. military is already deploying forces to the Middle East. While Iranian officials reject negotiations under duress, anti-war members of Congress are working to prevent unauthorized U.S. intervention, facing challenges in garnering support despite public opposition to war. Top Democrats express concerns about the lack of strategy and potential risks, but some remain hesitant to publicly oppose the administration.
Read More
Following India’s “Operation Sindoor,” Prime Minister Modi visited Adampur Air Base in Punjab, a site Pakistan claimed to have damaged in retaliatory strikes. His visit served to underscore India’s rejection of these claims, supported by satellite imagery confirming no significant damage to the airbase. The Prime Minister expressed gratitude to the armed forces for their actions during the operation, which resulted in the reported deaths of over 100 terrorists. This visit occurred days after a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood