Venezuela says the U.S. intercepted and boarded a Venezuelan tuna vessel in a “hostile” manner, and it’s got a lot of folks talking. It seems a U.S. destroyer, according to Venezuela’s Foreign Minister, intercepted, boarded, and essentially occupied a Venezuelan fishing vessel within Venezuela’s Special Economic Zone. Now, the Venezuelans are calling the whole thing illegal and hostile, adding that the crew consisted of “humble” fishermen and that the vessel posed no threat.
The immediate reaction here is a mix of skepticism and concern. A lot of the discussion immediately goes to the question of legality. Did the U.S. have any right to be doing this in Venezuelan waters?… Continue reading
President Trump will decide within two weeks whether the U.S. will take military action against Iran, a decision influenced by the possibility of upcoming negotiations. This announcement follows escalating conflict between Israel and Iran, including Iranian missile strikes on Israeli civilian targets, resulting in casualties and widespread damage. Israel has retaliated with intensified strikes on Iranian facilities, while Iran denies targeting civilians. International concern is rising, with some nations urging restraint and a return to diplomacy.
Read More
President Trump is reportedly considering military action against Iran, having privately approved attack plans but delaying a final order to see if Tehran abandons its nuclear program. This decision follows pressure from Israeli officials and Republican hawks, and the U.S. military is already deploying forces to the Middle East. While Iranian officials reject negotiations under duress, anti-war members of Congress are working to prevent unauthorized U.S. intervention, facing challenges in garnering support despite public opposition to war. Top Democrats express concerns about the lack of strategy and potential risks, but some remain hesitant to publicly oppose the administration.
Read More
Following India’s “Operation Sindoor,” Prime Minister Modi visited Adampur Air Base in Punjab, a site Pakistan claimed to have damaged in retaliatory strikes. His visit served to underscore India’s rejection of these claims, supported by satellite imagery confirming no significant damage to the airbase. The Prime Minister expressed gratitude to the armed forces for their actions during the operation, which resulted in the reported deaths of over 100 terrorists. This visit occurred days after a ceasefire agreement between India and Pakistan.
Read More
India has mobilized 14 Territorial Army (TA) infantry battalions, totaling roughly 10,500 personnel, for deployment nationwide until February 2028. This augmentation of forces, enabled by invoking Rule 33 of the Territorial Army Rule 1948, supports the regular army in various roles, freeing up regular troops for heightened operational preparedness along the border with Pakistan. The mobilization also includes recalling disembodied TA personnel and curtailing leave for active-duty personnel. This action reflects escalating tensions between India and Pakistan.
Read More
Following Indian missile strikes targeting nine Pakistani terror camps, Pakistan reported a series of subsequent drone attacks across multiple locations, including Karachi and Lahore, resulting in injuries to four troops near Lahore. The Pakistani military attributed these attacks to Indian-launched Israeli Harop drones, claiming ongoing operations and significant retaliatory actions by Indian forces against Pakistani military and air defense targets. These actions, in response to a prior terror attack, further escalated tensions between India and Pakistan. The Indian defense ministry confirmed its response involved neutralizing Pakistani air defenses.
Read More
Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar announced credible intelligence suggesting imminent Indian military action, allegedly based on false accusations regarding a Pahalgam terrorist incident. Tarar warned India of severe consequences, emphasizing Pakistan’s consistent condemnation of terrorism and its proposal for a neutral investigation into the incident, which India reportedly rejected. Pakistan urged international awareness of the situation and declared India solely responsible for any resulting escalation. The purported timeframe for the anticipated Indian attack is 24 to 36 hours. Pakistan vowed a decisive response to any aggression.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker