Donald Trump’s announced plans for mass deportations during a second term will severely harm nearly 20 million US-born children with immigrant parents. These policies, which aim to create a climate of fear within immigrant communities, will inflict significant psychological damage on these children, echoing the trauma caused by previous administrations’ family separation policies. Unlike prior administrations, however, Trump’s actions appear intentionally designed to cause this harm as a means of deterring immigration. The long-term effects will include increased stress, limited access to essential services, and potential family separation, forcing children to leave the US alongside deported parents.
Read More
Tom Homan, the incoming border czar, threatened to jail Denver Mayor Mike Johnston for refusing to comply with potential deportation plans. Johnston, who has publicly stated his willingness to be arrested, supports limited deportations for serious criminals but opposes mass deportations. CNN host Kasie Hunt reacted with visible shock to Homan’s statement, describing the rhetoric as more extreme than during the Trump campaign. A former Trump official argued that such strong language is an effective deterrent to illegal immigration.
Read More
Following the election, several major cities—including Los Angeles, Chicago, and Philadelphia—declared themselves “sanctuary cities,” vowing to protect unauthorized residents from mass deportations. These actions, while not legally preventing deportations, aim to hinder enforcement through legal challenges and resource limitations. The Los Angeles Unified School District also declared itself a sanctuary, mirroring similar commitments from other cities and states. Despite potential legal challenges and threats of federal funding cuts, these jurisdictions are committed to resisting the anticipated large-scale deportation efforts.
Read More
The recent pronouncements by Tom Homan, regarding the potential jailing of Denver’s mayor, Mike Johnston, have ignited a firestorm of controversy. Homan’s willingness to imprison Johnston stems from the mayor’s stated intention to actively oppose mass deportations, even to the point of accepting incarceration. This stark clash of wills highlights a deep divide over immigration policy and the role of local officials in challenging federal actions.
The situation is further complicated by the inherent power imbalance. Homan’s position, however defined, carries the weight of a Trump administration appointee, while Johnston is an elected official representing a specific city. The question of jurisdiction and authority immediately arises; can a federal appointee legitimately threaten imprisonment of a locally elected official based solely on their opposition to federal policy?… Continue reading
Homan’s declaration that he “guarantees” federal funds will be cut from states uncooperative with deportation efforts is a bold statement, brimming with potential consequences. The immediate reaction centers on the inherent irony: many of the states most likely to resist these policies are also the largest contributors to the federal treasury. This suggests a potential scenario where the federal government, by punishing these states financially, could be shooting itself in the foot economically.
This threat of financial punishment raises significant questions about the federal government’s relationship with individual states. The idea of “states’ rights,” often championed by the same political factions proposing these cuts, seems to be conveniently forgotten when it suits their agenda.… Continue reading
US farm groups are appealing to Donald Trump to exempt their workforce from deportation, a request that highlights the complex and often contradictory nature of political alliances. This situation underscores a critical point: the consequences of political choices often extend far beyond the ballot box, impacting not just individuals, but entire industries.
The predicament faced by these farm groups serves as a stark reminder of the importance of careful consideration before casting a vote. The consequences of supporting a candidate with a clearly stated policy on immigration, such as mass deportation, can have immediate and devastating consequences for those who rely on undocumented workers.… Continue reading
Donald Trump’s proposed immigration policies, including mass deportations and the potential violation of birthright citizenship, represent a grave threat to the American legal and economic system. These plans, if enacted, would severely impact California’s economy, particularly agriculture and construction, and cause widespread social disruption. California Attorney General Rob Bonta has stated that the state is prepared to take legal action against any unlawful actions taken by the federal government. This preparedness includes preemptive legal strategies and collaboration with other states and advocacy groups to protect residents and challenge federal overreach.
Read More
President-elect Trump’s proposed mass deportation of undocumented immigrants has sparked widespread panic within the agricultural and restaurant sectors, which heavily rely on this workforce. The American Business Immigration Coalition estimates that this policy could result in a $30-$60 billion loss in agricultural output, with potentially devastating consequences for the dairy industry and beyond. Experts warn of significant economic repercussions, including widespread business closures and a massive increase in government spending on deportations. Business leaders are urging policymakers to consider the far-reaching consequences of such a drastic measure and adopt a more balanced approach.
Read More
Stephen Miller’s appointment as a senior advisor, a role he previously held under Trump, is unsurprising given his longstanding influence on the administration’s “America First” immigration policies. Known for his extreme anti-immigrant stance, Miller advocates for measures such as mass deportations and militarizing the border. His ideology aligns closely with white nationalist views, evidenced by leaked emails promoting such material, and he has significantly shaped Trump’s rhetoric and policy on immigration, including the first Muslim travel ban and family separations. Miller’s lack of prior policy expertise hasn’t hindered his considerable impact.
Read More
Facing criticism for policies contributing to housing shortages, inflation, and strained public services, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau acknowledged mistakes in his government’s immigration approach. The government’s rapid increase in immigration, intended to address labor shortages, inadvertently allowed exploitation by “bad actors” such as fake colleges and corporations. To rectify this, Canada will significantly reduce both permanent and temporary immigration over the next three years, prioritizing skilled workers in crucial sectors. This temporary reduction aims to alleviate pressure on housing and infrastructure while the country works towards expanding its capacity.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood