In a recent video, six Democratic lawmakers with military or intelligence backgrounds reminded active-duty personnel they can refuse illegal orders, citing concerns about threats to the Constitution. This triggered an extreme response from the right, including former President Trump, who suggested the lawmakers’ actions were punishable by death. The lawmakers were simply reiterating service members’ oath to defend the Constitution and the right to refuse unlawful orders. Trump’s reaction is particularly concerning given his past actions and willingness to politicize the military, making the lawmakers’ warning a necessary one.
Read More
A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order blocking the Trump administration from deploying any National Guard units to Oregon. This decision came after the president attempted to circumvent a prior ruling against deploying Oregon’s National Guard by mobilizing troops from California and potentially Texas. The judge, appointed by Trump, questioned the federal government’s actions as a circumvention of her initial order. Both Oregon and California officials have expressed their disapproval of the president’s actions, with the Governor vowing to resist further attempts to deploy troops.
Read More
As the specter of fascism looms, some U.S. military members grapple with whether to defy potentially illegal orders. Calls to the GI Rights Hotline and the Center on Conscience & War have surged, indicating growing concerns about the military being used as a tool for authoritarianism. Service members fear being forced to participate in actions that violate their principles, particularly concerning anti-immigrant policies and the erosion of democratic norms. These concerns extend to military families who worry about the blurring lines between military, law enforcement, and immigration enforcement, and potential damage to community relationships. While service members have the right to refuse illegal orders, the consequences of dissent can be severe, leading to loss of benefits, rank, and even imprisonment.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker