Fears grow inside military over illegal orders after Hegseth authorized follow-up boat strike. It’s becoming increasingly clear that the authorization of a follow-up boat strike by Hegseth has cast a long shadow over the military, sparking deep concerns about the potential for illegal orders and the consequences of blindly following them. The discussions surrounding this situation highlight a serious erosion of trust and a growing sense of unease within the ranks.
The core of the problem seems to be the very nature of the actions themselves. Striking against unarmed boats, regardless of suspicions of drug smuggling, is, at its face, problematic.… Continue reading
President Trump has stated that Pete Hegseth denied issuing the order to kill the crew of a boat. Furthermore, the president indicated he would not have authorized a second strike on the vessel after the initial attack, even though two survivors remained. This statement comes after reports surfaced detailing the incident. The President’s comments were released on November 30, 2025 at 8:33 p.m. EST.
Read More
The Pentagon’s investigation into Senator Mark Kelly, a retired Navy fighter pilot, over a video concerning “illegal orders” has sparked debate among legal experts. Some argue the Pentagon is misinterpreting military law, while others claim a sitting member of Congress cannot be prosecuted. Despite the investigation, Kelly maintains his actions as a senator are protected, and that he will not be deterred from his duties. Military law experts suggest the case could be dismissed, and question if military law can be applied in this situation. Furthermore, constitutional protections, rooted in the separation of powers, may shield Kelly from this investigation.
Read More
User feedback regarding video advertisements revealed several common problems. Respondents frequently reported slow loading times for both the ads themselves and the subsequent video content. Issues also included frozen or incomplete ad playback, as well as instances where the intended video failed to start after the ad concluded. Additionally, complaints about excessively loud audio levels in the ads were prevalent.
Read More
Senator Mark Kelly responded to accusations from the Pentagon regarding a video advising military personnel to refuse illegal orders, asserting his statement was “non-controversial.” The Pentagon launched an investigation and hinted at recalling Kelly to active duty, citing a federal law that prohibits interference with the armed forces. Trump reacted strongly, accusing the senators of “seditious behavior,” which could carry a death penalty for active military. The controversy highlights the use of “sedition” and comes amid allegations from Democrats of the Pentagon issuing illegal orders, including sending personnel to the US-Mexico border and strikes on alleged drug-carrying boats.
Read More
According to the AP News, the FBI has contacted Democratic lawmakers featured in a social media video urging U.S. troops to defy “illegal orders,” signaling potential inquiry into the matter. This follows the Pentagon’s review of Sen. Mark Kelly for potential military law violations and President Trump’s accusations of sedition against the lawmakers. The lawmakers involved in the video, all of whom have military or intelligence backgrounds, have received requests from the FBI for interviews, though the exact basis of the inquiry remains unclear. The video encouraged troops to reject illegal orders, a message which has ignited the current federal investigation.
Read More
In response to perceived intimidation, Kelly recounted his military and NASA service, highlighting his dedication to the country. He emphasized his commitment to his job and the Constitution, expressing that he would not be silenced by those prioritizing power. This comes amid illegal orders from the Trump administration, including a recent ruling against the deployment of the National Guard. Kelly’s statement directly challenges the administration’s actions and perceived threats.
Read More
Kelly to Hegseth: Pentagon investigation over ‘illegal orders’ video won’t ‘intimidate me’ is a situation that’s really got people talking, and for good reason. It all started with a video from Senator Mark Kelly, where he essentially reminded service members of their duty to uphold the law and not follow illegal orders. That’s a pretty straightforward message, right? But the reaction from some corners, particularly the Trump administration, has been anything but.
The response from the administration, with calls for Kelly’s arrest and even suggestions of execution, is what’s truly alarming. It’s like they’re trying to punish someone for simply stating the obvious – that soldiers aren’t supposed to obey orders that break the law.… Continue reading
The Pentagon has initiated an investigation into Democratic Senator Mark Kelly for potential violations of military law after he participated in a video urging U.S. troops to reject unlawful orders. The Pentagon cited a federal law allowing for the recall of retired service members, like Kelly, for possible court-martial or other actions, indicating his statements may have interfered with military order and discipline. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth stated Kelly was the only lawmaker targeted because he is the only one who formally retired from the military, placing him under the Pentagon’s jurisdiction. The video, released last Tuesday, also prompted criticism from President Donald Trump who accused the lawmakers of sedition, although reactions from troops online have been minimal.
Read More
The Democrats’ video serves as an act of patriotism, signaling to government officials that some lawmakers are upholding the law and monitoring potential dangers arising from Trump’s orders. This action is especially relevant regarding the military, where Congress maintains regulatory authority. Democrats are attempting oversight in the absence of Republican cooperation, aiming to spark a necessary public debate on whether Trump’s actions constitute illegal orders. Therefore, any criticism of this intervention is misplaced, as the debate is crucial, and the Democrats intend to pursue it regardless.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker