Congress erupts at Trump’s shutdown mass firings: “This is a disaster”
Let’s be frank: the news coming out of Washington is, well, a mess. The recent reports of mass firings of federal workers orchestrated during the government shutdown have predictably ignited a firestorm of outrage on Capitol Hill. The sentiment seems to be a mixture of disbelief, anger, and a hefty dose of “we told you so.” This isn’t just a policy disagreement; it’s a full-blown crisis, according to many. The firings, reportedly happening en masse, have been widely condemned as a blatant power grab and a devastating blow to the stability of the federal workforce.… Continue reading
The White House budget office issued a memo instructing federal agencies to prepare for potential mass firings in the event of a government shutdown, escalating the funding dispute. This move reveals the Trump administration’s internal operational planning, which had previously been kept secret. The memo aligns with the administration’s long-term goals of workforce reduction and places pressure on Democrats to concede on funding demands. While some Republicans express concerns, Democrats are unlikely to budge, viewing the memo as a scare tactic.
Read More
White House asks for mass firing plans ahead of possible government shutdown, and the situation feels…well, let’s just say it feels like a movie we’ve seen before. It’s a bit like a script where the bad guys are threatening to hurt people unless they get their way. The core issue here is the looming possibility of a government shutdown, and the apparent plan involves requesting agencies to prepare for mass layoffs. Think of it as a contingency plan, but one that raises serious questions about the administration’s priorities and the potential impact on the American people.
The immediate impression is one of, let’s call it, “calculated chaos.”… Continue reading
A federal judge in Washington D.C. swiftly blocked a mass firing of approximately 1,400-1,500 Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) employees, deeming the action a violation of a previous court injunction. The judge, Amy Berman Jackson, found the government’s claim of complying with the injunction unconvincing, citing the speed and scope of the firings. The injunction, partially upheld on appeal, prohibits broad work stoppages and mandates individualized assessments before terminating employees. The judge paused the firings and the immediate shutdown of employee systems access, ordering a full investigation into the government’s justification.
Read More
Late Friday, approximately 300 employees of the US Institute of Peace were terminated via email, following President Trump’s executive order to close the organization. The firings, overseen by Elon Musk’s “department of government efficiency,” were executed after a legal battle resulting in a judge’s rebuke of Doge representatives’ actions but not the reinstatement of the institute’s leadership. Employees were given until April 7th to vacate their offices, and are now exploring individual legal recourse. The White House cited the institute’s alleged failure to deliver on its mission as justification for its closure.
Read More
The mass firing of federal employees under the Trump-Musk administration creates a significant national security risk. Thousands of individuals with access to sensitive information are now vulnerable to recruitment by foreign adversaries like Russia and China. This unprecedented situation presents a substantial counterespionage challenge for the U.S., as the number of potential targets vastly surpasses typical annual turnover. Experts warn that even a single compromised former employee could cause a national security crisis, highlighting the increased risk posed by this widespread job displacement.
Read More
The Social Security Administration (SSA), under its current acting commissioner, is undergoing a major restructuring involving significant workforce reductions, potentially up to 50%. Employees are being offered various options, including early retirement and severance packages, to leave the agency by March 14th. This action, coupled with office closures, is raising concerns about significant delays and disruptions to benefit payments. Critics argue this dismantlement aims to privatize Social Security, jeopardizing the timely and accurate delivery of benefits to millions of Americans.
Read More
The Trump administration abruptly fired hundreds of probationary employees at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), impacting approximately 10% of its workforce. These cuts disproportionately affected long-term employees recently promoted or transferred, resulting in the loss of significant institutional knowledge and expertise. Critics, including former NOAA officials and members of Congress, decried the firings as shortsighted and dangerous, arguing they will compromise NOAA’s ability to provide vital weather forecasting, climate data, and other critical services. The firings have been condemned as reckless and potentially life-threatening.
Read More
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard terminated over 100 intelligence officers across 15 agencies for inappropriate discussions on a government chat platform, including topics like polyamory, gender transition, and politics. This action, following reports from conservative commentator Christopher Rufo, was justified as an “egregious violation of trust” and a breach of professional standards. The terminations are part of a broader effort to reform the intelligence community and restore public trust, as stated by Gabbard. Simultaneously, Gabbard’s office faces a legal challenge regarding the planned dismissal of dozens of officers involved in diversity programs.
Read More
The Office of Special Counsel (OSC) ruled that the mass firings of probationary federal employees were likely illegal, citing violations of laws governing probationary terminations and reductions in force. The decision, concerning six workers but impacting potentially 200,000, found that the dismissals lacked individualized cause and circumvented proper reduction-in-force procedures. OSC head Hampton Dellinger requested stays on the six firings and is exploring broader remedies. This action directly challenges President Trump and Elon Musk’s efforts to drastically shrink the federal workforce. The ruling is a significant setback for their administration’s personnel policies.
Read More
Matt Underwood 
John Q. Hosedrinker