President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter, was not an act of nepotism, but rather a necessary measure to prevent the weaponization of the justice system against the Biden family. Hunter’s prosecution, based on relatively minor gun and tax charges, was excessively harsh and politically motivated, exceeding what would typically be brought in similar circumstances. Republicans actively interfered in the initial plea deal, leading to more severe charges. The pardon aims to safeguard against future politically driven prosecutions under a potential Trump administration.
Read More
Criticism of President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter, is unfounded. These critiques wrongly assume that Democrats should adhere to different standards than Republicans, ignoring the latter’s consistent disregard for norms. The article argues that President Biden’s pardon is justifiable, contrasting it with President Trump’s pardons of convicted co-conspirators and allies. Ultimately, the author advocates for abolishing the pardon power entirely due to its inherent potential for abuse.
Read More
On *The Daily Show*, Jon Stewart criticized President Biden’s pardon of Hunter Biden, not for the pardon itself, but for the Democrats’ prior use of Biden’s promise *not* to pardon his son as a cornerstone of their “law and order” platform. Stewart argued this created a perception of hypocrisy and undermined public trust in the system. He urged Democrats to utilize legal loopholes and strategies, but to do so for the benefit of all citizens, not just those connected to powerful individuals. This inconsistency, Stewart contended, fuels the belief that the system is rigged.
Read More
The pardon of Hunter Biden has ignited a firestorm of criticism, yet the consensus among legal experts seems to be that overturning the pardon is simply not feasible. This isn’t a novel situation; presidential pardons have been a source of contention throughout history, but the current political climate has amplified the outrage.
The intensity of the backlash is perceived by some as hypocritical, pointing to the relative silence surrounding similar actions by previous administrations. The argument is raised that the same individuals now decrying the pardon were largely unconcerned by previous instances of presidential pardons deemed controversial or politically motivated.
The argument that the pardon represents a gross miscarriage of justice often clashes with the legal reality that a presidential pardon is, within the bounds of its constitutional authority, unchallengeable.… Continue reading
Congressman Cohen’s statement highlights the lack of checks on presidential clemency power, citing President Biden’s pardon of his son as a case in point. He argues that Hunter Biden’s prosecution was politically motivated and that the pardon, while understandable given the father-son relationship, raises concerns about potential abuse. To address this, Congressman Cohen advocates for a constitutional amendment restricting presidential pardons for family members, administration officials, and those acting on the President’s behalf to prevent conflicts of interest and corrupt practices. The amendment would also invalidate pardons issued for corrupt purposes.
Read More
Meghan McCain criticized President Biden’s pardon of his son, Hunter Biden, on social media, arguing it demonstrated that the president’s family is above the law. This sparked a backlash from commenters who pointed out McCain’s own career benefited from her father’s political prominence. Hunter Biden’s pardon covers tax and drug charges, with President Biden citing political bias in the prosecution. The pardon, issued days before sentencing, has drawn widespread Republican criticism.
Read More
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, who faced felony charges including tax evasion and gun-related offenses, citing Republican political pressure influencing the legal process. This action drew immediate condemnation from Republicans, who accused the president of abusing his power and undermining justice. In response, Rep. Jasmine Crockett defended the pardon, highlighting the hypocrisy given President-elect Trump’s own history of controversial pardons and numerous ongoing legal battles. Crockett argued that the pardon pales in comparison to Trump’s actions and that Republicans’ outrage is disingenuous. No evidence linking President Biden to Hunter’s alleged crimes has been found.
Read More
Crockett’s challenge to Republicans criticizing Hunter Biden’s pardon – “Take a look in the mirror” – cuts to the heart of the matter. It highlights the glaring hypocrisy embedded in the GOP’s outrage, particularly given the sheer volume of controversial pardons issued during the Trump administration.
The sheer number of pardons granted by Trump for individuals convicted of serious crimes, including those involving violence and potential war crimes, stands in stark contrast to the comparatively less egregious nature of Hunter Biden’s offenses. This disparity fuels the argument that the Republican criticisms are less about justice and more about partisan politics.
The argument implicitly points out the double standard at play; a lack of consistent outrage across administrations creates the impression of selective morality.… Continue reading
The White House’s assertion that Donald Trump wouldn’t “let go” of Hunter Biden in the context of a potential pardon highlights a deeply partisan and intensely personal conflict playing out on the national stage. This isn’t simply about legal proceedings; it’s about the weaponization of the justice system for political gain.
The pardon itself is viewed by many as a necessary preemptive measure. The relentless pursuit of Hunter Biden by Republican-led investigations was seen not as a genuine quest for justice, but as a calculated attempt to damage Joe Biden politically. The intensity and the seemingly disproportionate penalties pursued against Hunter for relatively minor offenses underscored this perception.… Continue reading
President Biden pardoned his son, Hunter, citing politically motivated charges and selective prosecution. This action drew swift condemnation from Republicans, who accused the president of hypocrisy and avoiding accountability. Simultaneously, the president-elect, Trump, is reportedly installing loyalists into key positions, including nominating Charles Kushner as Ambassador to France and potentially replacing FBI Director Wray with Kash Patel. These appointments, along with the pardon, demonstrate a pattern of prioritizing personal loyalty and retribution over democratic norms and institutional integrity. The overall narrative highlights a deeply partisan environment characterized by mutual animosity and disregard for established procedures.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood