House Spending Bill

GOP Budget Rule Sparks Outcry: Bond Requirement Could Silence Legal Challenges to Trump

A recently passed House spending bill includes a provision requiring financial bonds for injunctions against the Trump administration, effectively limiting legal challenges to the wealthy. This measure, buried within the bill, has drawn criticism for potentially shielding the administration from accountability by making legal action financially prohibitive for most Americans. Experts like Erwin Chemerinsky deem the provision unprecedented and harmful, arguing it’s designed to limit judicial power and prevent court orders from being enforced. Human Rights Watch similarly warns of the provision’s autocratic implications, hindering challenges to the administration’s actions.

Read More

Musk’s Political Failure: Capitol Hill Humiliation as Spending Deal Fails

A House spending bill, initially negotiated with Democrats, was rejected after Elon Musk and President-elect Trump opposed it, leading to its failure with a vote of 235 to 174. Musk and Trump blamed House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries for the bill’s defeat, while Jeffries countered that the bill was a result of the GOP’s wealthy donors. The rejection leaves the US government facing a shutdown, with Speaker Johnson needing to find a bipartisan solution before the deadline. Despite the blame shifting, 38 Republicans also voted against the bill, highlighting the deep divisions within the party.

Read More