The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History quietly removed mentions of Donald Trump’s two impeachments from its “American Presidency” exhibit, reverting to its pre-2008 version. This decision, which now only references impeachments of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton, allegedly came after pressure from the Trump White House. Critics online and in the media quickly condemned the move, calling it “Orwellian” and accusing the museum of bowing to political influence. The Smithsonian cited a need to update the section, but the omission, combined with Trump’s recent actions reshaping national organizations, fueled accusations of historical revisionism.
Read More
The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History removed references to Donald Trump’s impeachments from an exhibit display in July, citing a content review following pressure from the White House. A temporary label, added in September 2021 and including information about Trump’s impeachments, was removed and the display was returned to its 2008 appearance. This change aligns with broader concerns about political interference at the Smithsonian and efforts by the Trump administration to control its work. The Smithsonian stated a future exhibit will include all impeachments and that updating the current display would take time and funding.
Read More
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi refuted Russian justifications for the war in Ukraine, highlighting that the claims of NATO expansion being a threat contradict President Putin’s own statements from 2004. At that time, Putin welcomed NATO enlargement and expressed hope it would strengthen trust. Tykhyi accuses Putin of rewriting history to justify his aggression. He emphasized that NATO expansion has never threatened Russia; instead, it has denied Moscow the ability to conquer sovereign European nations.
Read More
A new Trump administration policy, aiming to eliminate “negative” portrayals of American history in national parks, has been met with widespread criticism. Instead of reporting such information, visitors overwhelmingly opposed the initiative, praising park staff and urging the preservation of truthful historical accounts. The policy, stemming from a March executive order, seeks to present a more positive, unified narrative of American history. Early responses to the policy’s implementation reveal near-universal rejection of its intentions.
Read More
On June 19, 2025, a memorial service commemorated the 80th anniversary of devastating U.S. air raids on Fukuoka, which killed or left missing over 1,000 people. The raids, involving at least 1,300 metric tons of incendiary bombs, caused catastrophic damage, particularly at the Jugo Ginko bank where a power outage trapped and killed 63 people sheltering in its basement. Yoshitaka Mizobe, a survivor who lost his father in the war, attended the service, underscoring the need to remember this tragedy and prevent future conflicts. He continues to share his wartime experiences with younger generations to ensure this history is not forgotten.
Read More
During a recent podcast appearance, Vice President JD Vance controversially defended Confederate soldiers, arguing against the notion that all Confederate fighters were evil. This statement drew significant backlash online, with critics accusing Vance of historical revisionism and minimizing the Confederacy’s pro-slavery agenda. Many pointed out the Confederacy’s explicit goal of preserving slavery and its treasonous actions against the United States. Vance’s comments were further criticized for their perceived irony, given the established historical understanding of the Confederacy’s aims.
Read More
National parks, places meant to preserve and illuminate our nation’s history, are now facing a directive to essentially police their own narratives. This isn’t about accurate historical representation; it’s about a concerted effort to sanitize the past, to eliminate any aspect that might cause discomfort, particularly for a certain segment of the population. The idea that history should be comfortable is fundamentally misguided. History, by its very nature, is complex, messy, and often uncomfortable. It’s filled with both triumphs and tragedies, moments of pride and periods of profound shame. Ignoring or downplaying the less palatable parts doesn’t erase them; it merely prevents us from learning from them.… Continue reading
Despite a congressional mandate and bipartisan funding, a commemorative plaque honoring Capitol Police officers injured during the January 6th riot remains unplaced, languishing in a Capitol basement. House Republicans, allegedly at the behest of Donald Trump, are obstructing its installation, effectively attempting to downplay the events of that day. Democrats, meanwhile, are advocating for the plaque’s immediate placement, emphasizing the need to honor the officers’ sacrifices. This inaction stands in stark contrast to the legal requirement and the overwhelming public support for recognizing the officers’ bravery.
Read More
Following Russia’s first direct talks with Ukraine in three years, Kremlin negotiator Vladimir Medinsky expressed satisfaction with the discussions and a commitment to continued negotiations. He invoked the 21-year Great Northern War as a historical precedent for Russia’s willingness to sustain its military campaign in Ukraine indefinitely. Medinsky reportedly conveyed Russia’s preparedness for a prolonged conflict, emphasizing their resolve even at the cost of further casualties. This stance suggests a hardened negotiating position and a commitment to achieving their objectives regardless of the duration required.
Read More
Ukraine’s staunch opposition to Russia’s upcoming WWII Victory Day parade underscores a deep historical and political chasm. The Ukrainian government’s call for a boycott isn’t simply a matter of diplomatic posturing; it’s a powerful statement rooted in a complex and often painful re-evaluation of the past. The assertion that the Soviet Union’s role in the defeat of Nazi Germany shouldn’t be celebrated as “liberation” reflects a perspective that views Soviet actions not as acts of altruism but as a replacement of one oppressive regime with another.
This perspective highlights the immense human cost of Soviet rule in Eastern Europe, a cost often overlooked amidst celebrations of victory over the Nazis.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood