The White House is conducting a review of the Smithsonian Museum’s exhibits related to the United States’ 250th anniversary. This review, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, seeks to ensure the exhibits align with the administration’s interpretation of American history, encompassing exhibition text, online content, and curatorial processes. This initiative follows an executive order mandating exhibits be “accurate, patriotic, and enlightening.” Previously, the Smithsonian removed and then re-added references to Donald Trump’s impeachments, with modifications to the descriptions of events surrounding his second impeachment.
Read More
US to rewrite its past national climate reports: Well, this is a real kick in the teeth, isn’t it? The idea of the US rewriting its past national climate reports… it’s a thought that just hangs in the air, heavy with implications. It feels like a direct challenge to everything we understand about science, historical accuracy, and, frankly, the future. The core concern seems to be about the integrity of information itself, the fear that factual data is being twisted to serve a specific agenda. This isn’t just about numbers and graphs; it’s about trust, about the very foundation upon which we build our understanding of the world and, more importantly, how we plan to preserve it.… Continue reading
The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History quietly removed mentions of Donald Trump’s two impeachments from its “American Presidency” exhibit, reverting to its pre-2008 version. This decision, which now only references impeachments of Andrew Johnson, Richard Nixon, and Bill Clinton, allegedly came after pressure from the Trump White House. Critics online and in the media quickly condemned the move, calling it “Orwellian” and accusing the museum of bowing to political influence. The Smithsonian cited a need to update the section, but the omission, combined with Trump’s recent actions reshaping national organizations, fueled accusations of historical revisionism.
Read More
The Smithsonian’s National Museum of American History removed references to Donald Trump’s impeachments from an exhibit display in July, citing a content review following pressure from the White House. A temporary label, added in September 2021 and including information about Trump’s impeachments, was removed and the display was returned to its 2008 appearance. This change aligns with broader concerns about political interference at the Smithsonian and efforts by the Trump administration to control its work. The Smithsonian stated a future exhibit will include all impeachments and that updating the current display would take time and funding.
Read More
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs Spokesperson Heorhii Tykhyi refuted Russian justifications for the war in Ukraine, highlighting that the claims of NATO expansion being a threat contradict President Putin’s own statements from 2004. At that time, Putin welcomed NATO enlargement and expressed hope it would strengthen trust. Tykhyi accuses Putin of rewriting history to justify his aggression. He emphasized that NATO expansion has never threatened Russia; instead, it has denied Moscow the ability to conquer sovereign European nations.
Read More
A new Trump administration policy, aiming to eliminate “negative” portrayals of American history in national parks, has been met with widespread criticism. Instead of reporting such information, visitors overwhelmingly opposed the initiative, praising park staff and urging the preservation of truthful historical accounts. The policy, stemming from a March executive order, seeks to present a more positive, unified narrative of American history. Early responses to the policy’s implementation reveal near-universal rejection of its intentions.
Read More
On June 19, 2025, a memorial service commemorated the 80th anniversary of devastating U.S. air raids on Fukuoka, which killed or left missing over 1,000 people. The raids, involving at least 1,300 metric tons of incendiary bombs, caused catastrophic damage, particularly at the Jugo Ginko bank where a power outage trapped and killed 63 people sheltering in its basement. Yoshitaka Mizobe, a survivor who lost his father in the war, attended the service, underscoring the need to remember this tragedy and prevent future conflicts. He continues to share his wartime experiences with younger generations to ensure this history is not forgotten.
Read More
During a recent podcast appearance, Vice President JD Vance controversially defended Confederate soldiers, arguing against the notion that all Confederate fighters were evil. This statement drew significant backlash online, with critics accusing Vance of historical revisionism and minimizing the Confederacy’s pro-slavery agenda. Many pointed out the Confederacy’s explicit goal of preserving slavery and its treasonous actions against the United States. Vance’s comments were further criticized for their perceived irony, given the established historical understanding of the Confederacy’s aims.
Read More
National parks, places meant to preserve and illuminate our nation’s history, are now facing a directive to essentially police their own narratives. This isn’t about accurate historical representation; it’s about a concerted effort to sanitize the past, to eliminate any aspect that might cause discomfort, particularly for a certain segment of the population. The idea that history should be comfortable is fundamentally misguided. History, by its very nature, is complex, messy, and often uncomfortable. It’s filled with both triumphs and tragedies, moments of pride and periods of profound shame. Ignoring or downplaying the less palatable parts doesn’t erase them; it merely prevents us from learning from them.… Continue reading
Despite a congressional mandate and bipartisan funding, a commemorative plaque honoring Capitol Police officers injured during the January 6th riot remains unplaced, languishing in a Capitol basement. House Republicans, allegedly at the behest of Donald Trump, are obstructing its installation, effectively attempting to downplay the events of that day. Democrats, meanwhile, are advocating for the plaque’s immediate placement, emphasizing the need to honor the officers’ sacrifices. This inaction stands in stark contrast to the legal requirement and the overwhelming public support for recognizing the officers’ bravery.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood