Psychiatry organizations are calling for the removal of Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., citing concerns over his actions increasing stigma, instilling fear, and hindering access to mental health and addiction care. These groups, including the Southern California Psychiatry Society and the Committee to Protect Public Mental Health, are alarmed by the Health Secretary’s attacks on psychiatric medications and his efforts to dismantle the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Administrations (SAMHSA). Experts worry that these actions, along with potential cuts to Medicaid, will compromise access to critical mental health services, ultimately leading to a “rolling crisis.” The organizations are urging lawmakers to replace Kennedy with a leader with expertise in public health and evidence-based care.
Read More
More than 1,000 HHS staff call on RFK Jr. to resign, and this is a significant development, to say the least. It speaks volumes about the level of dissatisfaction and concern within the Department of Health and Human Services regarding the current leadership. The sheer number of employees involved suggests that the issues go beyond simple disagreements; there’s a deep-seated worry about the direction the department is taking. It’s hard to ignore that kind of unified dissent.
The core of the discontent seems to be centered around the spread of misinformation and the perceived undermining of public health initiatives. If a large group of professionals, dedicated to safeguarding the health of the population, believes that their leader is actively working against that mission, it’s a serious problem.… Continue reading
Over 1,000 current and former US Department of Health and Human Services employees have written a letter to Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., urging his resignation due to actions they claim have put American health at risk. The letter specifically cites the facilitation of Dr. Susan Monarez’s firing, the appointment of “political ideologues” to vaccine policy roles, and the rescinding of emergency use authorizations for COVID-19 vaccines without providing supporting data. This follows the ousting of Monarez and the resignations of several senior CDC officials, sparking calls for Kennedy’s removal from both members of Congress and public health groups. Kennedy has defended his actions, claiming to be restoring public trust in the CDC and eliminating conflicts of interest within the agency.
Read More
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has initiated a process to eliminate collective bargaining rights for numerous federal health agency employees, a move deemed illegal by the involved unions. HHS is also ending recognition of these unions and reclaiming office space and equipment previously allocated for union activities. This follows a pattern set by the Trump administration, which has previously targeted agencies like the Department of Veterans Affairs and the Environmental Protection Agency. Unions, such as the American Federation of Government Employees, argue that these contracts support a stable workforce and are critical for responding to public health emergencies, including advocating for improved safety measures after recent events at the CDC.
Read More
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will be canceling contracts and pulling funding from 22 mRNA vaccine projects, totaling $500 million, to combat respiratory viruses. This decision, led by the health secretary, is based on the belief that safer and broader vaccine strategies, such as whole-virus vaccines, are better. Infectious disease experts have criticized the decision, citing the safety and efficacy of mRNA technology, which was critical in slowing the 2020 coronavirus pandemic, and its potential for future pandemic response. HHS maintains that this signals a shift in priorities and will focus on developing a “universal vaccine” that mimics “natural immunity.”
Read More
Rep. Stephen Lynch’s letter to HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. demands answers regarding the “Make America Healthy Again” report, citing concerns about fabricated citations, misrepresented studies, and potential use of AI to generate false conclusions. News outlets, including NOTUS and The Washington Post, revealed evidence suggesting the report’s citations were manipulated, with some initially linking to nonexistent studies and others exhibiting hallmarks of AI-generated content. Lynch’s letter emphasizes the report’s apparent attempt to cover up these errors after their initial exposure, raising serious questions about the Trump administration’s commitment to scientific integrity. The letter formally requests information on the report’s drafting, review, publication, and subsequent amendments by June 16th.
Read More
A planned $50 million autism research study, utilizing a large database of autistic individuals, has sparked significant controversy. While the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) denies creating a registry, the planned “real-world data platform” raises concerns regarding data misuse, privacy violations, and potential stigmatization of autistic individuals. A petition garnering tens of thousands of signatures prompted HHS to seemingly backtrack, yet critical questions remain unanswered about data security and opt-out options. Experts warn that the project’s aggressive timeline and lack of robust ethical safeguards could jeopardize future autism research and harm the autistic community.
Read More
Twenty-three states and Washington, D.C., are suing the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. over the unlawful rescission of $12 billion in public health funding. The lawsuit seeks a temporary restraining order to halt the cuts, which will reportedly eliminate crucial public health services and cost thousands of healthcare jobs. The states argue that the funds, while initially allocated during the COVID-19 pandemic, supported long-term public health infrastructure and were not solely for pandemic response. The plaintiffs contend that HHS lacks the authority to unilaterally rescind congressionally appropriated funds, thereby undermining the legislative branch’s power.
Read More
Following a government-wide email demanding weekly work reports, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) advised employees not to respond, citing the risk of exposure to malign foreign actors. HHS emphasized that non-response would have no employment consequences, but cautioned that responses should be generic to protect sensitive data. This warning followed similar guidance from other agencies, while the Department of Transportation instructed its employees to respond. The email request, initiated by Elon Musk, has sparked controversy, with President Trump voicing support, while concerns remain about national security risks and the potential use of AI to evaluate employee necessity.
Read More
The HHS is engaged in a costly and inefficient search of its websites and documents for terms like “gay,” “trans,” and “diversity,” purportedly to comply with Trump-era executive orders targeting DEI initiatives. This “witch hunt,” as an anonymous source describes it, diverts engineers from their regular duties to scan thousands of pages and PDFs, including those linking to external documents. The effort, contrary to claims of efficiency, represents a significant waste of taxpayer money and is fueled by an apparent desire to purge content deemed objectionable. This action is occurring across multiple federal agencies.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood