The Trump administration plans to terminate approximately $100 million in federal funding to Harvard University. This action follows ongoing legal battles between the university and the White House, stemming from the administration’s blocking of funding and restrictions on international student enrollment. The administration alleges Harvard fails to address anti-semitism and promotes a liberal bias. Federal agencies will be instructed to find alternative vendors for the affected contracts.
Read More
President Trump threatened to revoke $3 billion in federal grants from Harvard University, diverting the funds to trade schools. This action escalates ongoing conflict stemming from the administration’s accusations of Harvard’s insufficient response to demands regarding student protests, diversity policies, and information disclosure about international students. Harvard has rejected these demands, citing constitutional concerns and filed lawsuits. Trump’s actions are part of his broader “rebuilding America” campaign message and focus on vocational education, while Harvard, possessing substantial financial resources, is prepared to contest these measures legally.
Read More
Trump’s fixation on Harvard appears to stem from a potent cocktail of factors, none of which are mutually exclusive. A primary element seems to be the rejection of his son, Barron, from the prestigious university. This perceived slight, coupled with the acceptance of Malia Obama, likely fueled a deep-seated resentment and desire for retribution.
The rejection of Barron could be interpreted as a personal affront, amplifying Trump’s existing insecurities regarding intelligence and academic achievement. His own potential rejection from Harvard, or a perceived lack of academic success compared to the Obamas, might further exacerbate this feeling. This isn’t simply about Barron; it’s about Trump’s own ego and the perceived humiliation of his son’s application not being successful.… Continue reading
Following a federal judge’s blocking of an administration effort to bar Harvard from enrolling international students, Donald Trump demanded the names and countries of origin of all international students enrolled at the university. This request, made via Truth Social, follows a Homeland Security letter threatening to terminate Harvard’s participation in the Student and Exchange Visitor Program. Harvard subsequently sued the administration, citing First and Fourteenth Amendment violations, a suit which a judge temporarily ruled in favor of the university. Trump’s actions are part of a broader pattern of targeting elite universities, particularly regarding their endowments and diversity initiatives.
Read More
While speculation arose regarding Barron Trump’s application to Harvard following a legal dispute between the university and the Trump administration, no confirmation exists that he applied, or was rejected. Instead, Barron chose New York University’s Stern School of Business, deviating from the family’s pattern of attending University of Pennsylvania or Georgetown University. His father, Donald Trump, is a Wharton School alumnus, while his siblings attended either Wharton or Georgetown. The rumors linking Barron’s purported rejection to the legal conflict remain unsubstantiated.
Read More
Donald Trump, citing Harvard’s high percentage of international students (27.2%), demanded the university disclose their identities and home countries, questioning why those nations don’t contribute financially to their education. This follows the Trump administration’s attempts to block Harvard from enrolling foreign students and revoke its federal funding, actions a federal court temporarily halted. The administration’s actions stem from a broader effort to review universities’ federal funds and have been criticized as a politically motivated attack on higher education. Harvard has countered these accusations, emphasizing the significant contributions international students make to the university and the nation.
Read More
The Wall Street Journal editorial board condemned the Trump administration’s attempt to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll international students, deeming the action detrimental to America’s global standing and competitiveness. The administration’s actions, including withholding funds from Columbia University and terminating grants for Harvard, stem from accusations of antisemitism on campuses and demands to reform DEI programs. The Journal argued that this approach harms America’s ability to attract top international talent, contrasting it with the administration’s other protectionist policies. Harvard subsequently obtained a court order allowing continued enrollment of international students while the case proceeds.
Read More
A federal judge’s recent decision to block the Trump administration’s attempt to revoke the enrollment of foreign students at Harvard University highlights a significant clash between executive power and judicial oversight. The administration, seemingly anticipating this legal challenge, likely hoped to create a chilling effect, deterring international students from applying to American universities. This strategy, while potentially successful in reducing international enrollment numbers, directly contradicts the core principles of the American legal system.
The administration’s argument, suggesting that unelected judges lack the authority to impede their immigration and national security policies, fundamentally misrepresents the balance of power enshrined in the U.S.… Continue reading
Princess Elisabeth of Belgium, heir to the Belgian throne, is currently pursuing a master’s degree in public policy at Harvard University. A recent Trump administration decision revoking Harvard’s ability to enroll international students threatens her continued studies. The Belgian royal palace is currently assessing the situation and its potential impact on the Princess’s education. The administration’s action, deemed illegal by Harvard, affects thousands of international students and could force them to leave the United States.
Read More
Following the Trump administration’s revocation of Harvard University’s ability to enroll international students, the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HKUST) offered unconditional admission to affected students. This action, prompted by the U.S. government’s crackdown on elite universities, aims to ensure a smooth transition for students facing deportation. The move comes amidst escalating tensions between the U.S. government and Harvard, involving lawsuits and funding cuts. HKUST’s offer highlights potential shifts in global higher education and underscores the significant financial and reputational costs of the U.S. government’s actions.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood