The United States’ interest in Greenland, spurred by President Trump’s statements about national security, has sparked concern among Greenlanders and Inuit advocacy groups. They strongly oppose American influence, citing past experiences with colonization and a desire for self-determination. These groups fear potential U.S. actions, including annexation, and the impact on their safety and sovereignty, especially given Greenland’s small population. Despite these concerns, Greenlandic leaders are open to diplomatic discussions with the U.S. to ensure their self-determination is respected, while the Chinese and Russians reject the claim that they pose a threat to Greenland.
Read More
Following US President Donald Trump’s expressed interest in acquiring Greenland, large-scale protests are planned for Saturday across Denmark and Greenland. Organized by Greenlandic associations, the demonstrations aim to send a unified message of respect for Greenland’s democracy and human rights. Protests are scheduled to take place in several cities, including Nuuk and Copenhagen, with demonstrators planning to march and carry Greenlandic flags. The rallies are meant to coincide with a visit from a bipartisan delegation of US lawmakers, and organizers demand respect for Greenland’s self-determination and international law.
Read More
Protests erupted in Copenhagen and Nuuk on Saturday, January 17, 2026, in response to U.S. President Donald Trump’s efforts to acquire Greenland. Demonstrators, including Greenland’s prime minister, voiced opposition to Trump’s plans and expressed support for Greenland’s self-determination. The protests were organized by Greenlandic associations and coincided with a visit from a bipartisan U.S. Congressional delegation that also opposed Trump’s actions. The demonstrations highlighted concerns about respecting Greenland’s autonomy, international law, and human rights amidst the ongoing situation.
Read More
Greenland’s party leaders rejected President Trump’s repeated calls for the U.S. to take control of the island, asserting that Greenland’s future must be determined by its people. The leaders emphasized their desire for the U.S. to cease its “contempt” for their country, stating that no other nation can interfere in their self-determination. Despite President Trump’s threat of using force, the statement reiterated that the decision-making process will occur with the Greenlandic people’s involvement and within the framework of international law. Most Greenlanders oppose a U.S. takeover, and the Danish Prime Minister warned that such an action would end NATO.
Read More
During a White House event, Trump stated a determination to acquire Greenland, fearing its takeover by Russia or China. He expressed a preference for a deal but indicated a willingness to act forcefully if necessary. Greenlandic leaders, however, reaffirmed their desire for self-determination and called for respectful diplomatic engagement. Amidst the rising tensions, Greenland’s parliament will hold a meeting, while European leaders expressed their support for Greenland’s autonomy, cautioning against any unilateral actions.
Read More
Sir Keir Starmer has stated that only Greenland and Denmark should determine Greenland’s future, directly responding to President Trump’s suggestions of the US annexing the territory. This stance contrasts with his response to the US military action in Venezuela, where he has been less definitive about its legality, despite criticisms from some Labour MPs and other parties. While acknowledging the removal of Venezuela’s president, Starmer has called for a peaceful transition to democracy and has expressed a commitment to international law. The UK is involved in the UN Security Council’s discussion on the US operation, with its representative calling for a legitimate government in Venezuela.
Read More
Pope Leo calls for Venezuela to remain an independent country. It seems like the core message here is that the Pope wants Venezuela to retain its sovereignty. This isn’t about annexing the country or changing its borders; it’s about ensuring Venezuela remains in control of its own destiny. The Pope, in his statement, is emphasizing the importance of “overcoming violence and embarking on paths of justice and peace” while safeguarding Venezuela’s independence. This resonates with the idea of self-determination, which means the right of a people to choose their own form of government and control their own affairs without outside interference.… Continue reading
We will not be anyone’s colony: Venezuela’s government seeks to reassert control. This statement, echoing through the current political climate, speaks volumes about Venezuela’s determination to maintain its sovereignty. It’s a sentiment that resonates deeply, particularly given the backdrop of decades of internal struggles and, as some would argue, the interference of external forces. The recent events, specifically the removal of Maduro, have brought this assertion of control into sharp focus.
The situation is undoubtedly complex. Venezuela, for years, has grappled with chronic mismanagement, a reality that cannot be ignored. However, many believe that the influence of the United States has often exacerbated these issues, rather than offering solutions.… Continue reading
Zelenskyy says only Ukrainians can decide Ukraine’s fate, a bold statement that immediately brings up the fundamental question of self-determination in the face of conflict. His declaration, coupled with the potential for a referendum on sensitive peace terms, throws a spotlight on the complexities of navigating a war.
The idea of a referendum is a significant move, especially considering the deeply personal nature of any potential peace agreement. However, the practicalities are immediately apparent: a genuine referendum requires a degree of safety, stability, and fairness. Zelenskyy himself acknowledges this, pointing out the need for a sustained ceasefire of at least sixty days to allow for a proper vote.… Continue reading
Ukraine’s future cannot be decided without Ukrainians, France’s Macron says, and that sentiment is crucial. It’s a simple statement, really, but it carries a weight that speaks to the very core of self-determination and sovereignty. We often hear this phrase, and it’s easy to nod along, but what does it *truly* mean in the context of the current situation? It means that any decisions about Ukraine’s fate, its borders, its governance, its very existence as a nation, should be made with the active participation and consent of the Ukrainian people. It’s about respecting their agency and their right to shape their own destiny, not allowing powerful nations to redraw maps or make deals over their heads.… Continue reading
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood