The Trump administration is intensifying intelligence gathering on Greenland, focusing on its independence movement and resource extraction, as the president persists in his pursuit of annexation. This includes identifying pro-annexation individuals in Greenland and Denmark to prioritize resource allocation for intelligence efforts. While the White House avoids commenting on intelligence matters, Trump has openly expressed concerns about Greenland’s security and the Arctic region, even hinting at potential military action. The administration is actively exploring the financial implications of annexation, including replacing Danish subsidies with potential payments to Greenland’s residents, despite widespread opposition from the Greenlandic population.
Read More
The Trump administration is pursuing a plan to annex Greenland, offering each resident approximately $10,000 annually in lieu of Danish subsidies. This initiative, involving multiple cabinet departments and the National Security Council, prioritizes persuasion over coercion, though military action remains unofficially considered. The plan’s financial feasibility is under review, exploring potential revenue from Greenland’s natural resources to offset annexation costs. Despite Greenland’s rejection and Danish criticism, the U.S. continues its pursuit, evidenced by Vice President Vance’s recent controversial visit.
Read More
The Trump administration is actively pursuing the annexation of Greenland, a plan involving a potential $10,000 annual payment to each resident to replace Danish subsidies. This initiative, involving multiple cabinet departments and the National Security Council, prioritizes diplomatic persuasion over military action, though force remains unruled out. Cost-benefit analyses are underway, exploring the potential revenue from Greenland’s natural resources against the expense of administering the territory. Despite strong Greenlandic opposition and Danish criticism, the U.S. continues its pursuit, recently evidenced by Vice President Vance’s visit to a U.S. military base on the island.
Read More
Less than 1 in 5 Americans favor annexing Canada and Greenland, according to a recent survey, a statistic that reveals a concerning undercurrent of support for a deeply problematic idea. Nearly half of those surveyed, a significant 49 percent, outright rejected the notion. This leaves a considerable portion of the population, 32 percent, expressing uncertainty about the prospect. The sheer number of individuals who are unsure about the implications of invading and annexing sovereign nations is alarming in itself, highlighting a potential lack of understanding of international relations and the gravity of such actions.
The fact that a substantial 17-20 percent expressed support for this aggressive action is deeply troubling.… Continue reading
During a White House meeting, President Trump reiterated his desire to annex Greenland, a proposal opposed by Greenland, Denmark, and many Americans. NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte diplomatically deflected the issue, stating he wouldn’t involve NATO in the matter. Despite Rutte’s rejection, Trump continued to discuss increased military presence in Greenland. The recent Greenlandic election resulted in a decisive victory for a party staunchly against annexation, further highlighting the unlikelihood of Trump’s plan.
Read More
Amidst Greenland’s legislative elections, President Trump asserted his belief in the eventual annexation of Greenland by the United States, citing reasons of international security. This statement, made during a White House meeting with NATO Secretary General Rutte, was met with Rutte’s immediate distancing of NATO from the discussion. Trump’s vision for such annexation was presented as likely, prompting a subsequent discussion between the two leaders. The issue’s unexpected emergence during a NATO meeting highlights the geopolitical complexities surrounding Greenland’s status.
Read More
John Q. Hosedrinker 
Matt Underwood